DWI one of the threads you posted, Tzvi criticised Lubab.. But
The beliefs of Meshachist Lubavitchers are considered by almost all other orthodox Jews to be outside the realm of Judaism. Meshachist Lubavitchers would probably say their rabbi never died. Under those circumstances, sending a letter to a dead person or their dead rabbi's grave, which is what Lubab suggested, is problematic. The person that posted for help/advice in that thread , did not come from a religious background and would not have known about the issue within Lubavitch, that some Lubavitch are Meshachist, and Lubab is. Lubab is infact part of an even more radical branch of Lubavitch, more than the Meshocists, they would use a kabbalistic metaphorical expression that a Lubavitcher Rebbe is G-d clothed in a body.
It is very controversial..
I think he should keep those views to himself, and to -religious- -knowledgeable- Jews that are aware of the issues, and just ask him personally for elaboration . It is dangerous to allow ignorant Jews to buy into it..
Lubab has largely kept it to himself unless asked. And fortunately there were Jews in that thread who picked him up on it.
You would have to quote specifically what Tzvi said that is the problem..
Saying Lubavitch have a huge issue. That is fine. They do. There is argument over the extent of it. One (unreliable dishonest manipulative) person I chatted to once, said he witnessed that the Lubavitcher Rebbe himself , was not just silent, but encouraged people to call him Mashiach, in 770. I have seen a website with videos showing the extent of the Meshachist problem, I can't find the link right now.
The Lubavitch rabbis , are either not Meshachist, or are hiding it. And so it really doesn't affect anybody else. I don't really criticise Lubavitch..
Lubab is unusual in that he is a Meshachist, or even more than that, a Boreinu type. And he admits it.
But Tzvi was right to criticise that post of Lulab's, and fine to argue with him over theological points.
If Tzvi said Lubavitch have a huge issue, that's possibly true. They certainly have a huge issue of people thinking they have a huge issue!
If Tzvi said Lubavitch ARE a huge issue, then given the fact that he can't even spell "huge".. I wouldn't take any one of his posts too seriously. And even if when asked, it turns out that he does mean that. Then it could be that he doesn't know.
But he does know a lot more about Judaism than gentiles here, and a lot more than many secular Jews here. Gentiles commenting on something involving Lubavitch are way out of their depth. They are almost certainly not familiar with them, or the issues surrounding their place in the orthodox Jewish world.
note- I do use askmoses quite a lot(there are one or two great scholars) and some of my favourite rabbis are Lubavitch - from that site... I like the Lubavitchers on askmoses!
You should quote exactly what Tzvi said.. Because that was a long thread.
Regarding Tzvi's silence about Tina Greco posting the picture on StørmFrønt.
Maybe point to the thread and let him defend himself.
I remember a thread where he made some mad prayer for Jews posting pornography anywhere to be destroyed. Which was really a moral equivalence he was doing..
Not that he would know what that means. So I think you are being too harsh on him..
And the porno condemnation may have consumed used his thoughts so much in that thread he forgot to condemn Tina Greco for the StørmFrønt issue. or he thought the latter was obvious . If he was silent when asked, then that's a big deal. I don't see evidence of that
I haven't seen him post for a while.. I know he had some exams. Wait for him to respond to defend himself. He probably has not noticed this thread.