General Category > Introduce Yourself
American Hindu friend
Lisa:
--- Quote ---I agree that we should stop Iran's nuclear program by force. But what about the Pakistanis who helped them get that nuclear technology (I have no doubt in my mind that the biggest contribution to Iranian nuclear ambitions was made by the Pakis), what do you think we should do about them? See, I agree with the neoconservatives that we need to prevent Islamic nations from getting nukes, but yet I never hear a word about stopping Pakistan from proliferating...why is that? As a supporter of the US/Israel/India alliance, I want to see ALL terrorist Islamic nations give up their nuclear ambitions, and the one Islamic nation that does have nukes is the greatest threat to allowing these nations to get nukes. Don't you agree?
Vikram
--- End quote ---
I agree.
angryChineseKahanist:
Welcome, and death to Islam.
Zelhar:
--- Quote from: vikram on July 22, 2008, 08:56:25 PM ---
--- Quote from: Zelhar on July 22, 2008, 04:52:37 PM ---Vikram you seem to have a very similar standing as JTF.
We must find alternative to petroleum and natural gas, and when we would, the Arabs are really screwed. The most urgent task though is to stop Iran nuclear program, and this can only be done by force.
--- End quote ---
I agree that we should stop Iran's nuclear program by force. But what about the Pakistanis who helped them get that nuclear technology (I have no doubt in my mind that the biggest contribution to Iranian nuclear ambitions was made by the Pakis), what do you think we should do about them? See, I agree with the neoconservatives that we need to prevent Islamic nations from getting nukes, but yet I never hear a word about stopping Pakistan from proliferating...why is that? As a supporter of the US/Israel/India alliance, I want to see ALL terrorist Islamic nations give up their nuclear ambitions, and the one Islamic nation that does have nukes is the greatest threat to allowing these nations to get nukes. Don't you agree?
Vikram
--- End quote ---
You're right, Porkistan too must be disarmed, it should have been prevented from getting its nukes, now its much harder to turn things back.
However a nuclear Iran is a much bigger threat than a nuclear Porkistan, I think Iran is much more likely to use nukes.
syyuge:
The complex turn of events perhaps indicate that obliteration of Pak666 may follow soon after the obliteration of Iran and before that of Arab.
Pak666 is very deceptive and is a turncoat soaked in wet soap, so it has always managed itself to slip out of hands. In June'2002 it silently slipped away, but it may be impossible for it to run away now or next time, I mean whichever comes first.
With Regards... :)
Hail Columbia:
Welcome to JTF.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version