OBAMA COULD NEVER BE VICE PRES. HERE'S WHY

[Cyberella]

 

Let’s face it, if Barak Obama wasn’t heading the Democratic ticket, he wouldn’t make the ticket.  That’s because the Vice Presidential nominee goes through an exhaustive “vetting”process that examines the person’s life in depth.  But, an exhaustive examination of Obama’s life would have eliminated him from consideration.  Here’ why:

Past associations:  One of the first things that gets examined in the VP process is the candidate’s prior associations.  In Obama’s case, he would have to overcome numerous problems.  For example, former unrepentant Weatherman member and federal office building bomber William Ayers held fundraisers for Obama early in his career.

Then there is Obama’s spiritual mentor of twenty years, Reverend Wright.  His race baiting, bigoted black separatist preaching was so extreme that when it made national news, it rocked the country.

Add into the mix, the Jack Abramoff of Illinois politics, Tony Rezko.  Less than two years ago, Obama was doing questionable business deals with the convicted felon.  True, Rezko had not been convicted at the time, but he was under investigation for political corruption.  A fact that Obama knew at the time that he was engaging in the questionable dealings.  Obama called the deals, “A bonehead move”.

Obama also has ties to an avowed communist, Saul Alinsky.  And these are just the better known associations. No candidate would have risked these ties in their VP nominee.

Experience:  This might have been Obama’s biggest weakness as a running mate.  He simply has no qualifications to be Vice- President on any level.  He’s never governed, or run a business.  His Senate experience is paper thin.  He did chair a Senate committee, but never held a hearing.  Obama began his run for President after just one year on the job as a United States Senator.  He simply would not have brought anything to the table for another candidate in this category.

Ideology:  Barak Obama is an extreme liberal.  His Senate voting record made him the most liberal member of that body.  His over arching economic theme is European style socialism that is being rejected even in Europe.  Obama is so outside the mainstream, that he would not have brought balance to any other candidate.

Abortion:  On this topic, Obama is so extreme that he would have off scared any potential running mate.  Obama actually blocked bills in the Illinois Senate on three occasions that would have protected the lives of children who had survived an abortion and were outside the mother’s womb.  Even the most extreme abortion proponent in the U.S. Senate, Barbara Boxer voted in favor of bills that afforded that much protection to the lives of innocent children. Abortion is a hot button topic for Catholics and Evangelicals.  Obama’s stance will alienate that voting block.

Electoral help:  Some VP picks are made because the nominee can help the head of the ticket carry an important state or states.  Here Obama would have been no help what so ever.  Illinois is going to vote Democratic.  Obama would not have helped carry any other state.

Integrity:  Obama has none.  From lying about his abortion record, to flip flopping on virtually every topic, Barak Obama is a man whose word cannot be trusted.  There is nothing in this category that Obama could have brought to improve a ticket.

Arrogance: Obama's sense of self worth is so out of proportion to his actual accomplishments, that no one would have wanted him on their ticket.  They would have been concerned about him upstaging the main guy. There would have been concern as well that Obama would have been using his office to promote himself at their expense.  Meglomaniacs don't make good running mates.  Maureen Dowd mentioned that Obama was aloof and distant with the air of a Prince of Privilege.  Not exactly the qualities of a team player.

Stature:  Also referred to as “gravitas”, which alludes to an individual’s respect on the national political scene, or Fortune 500 business community.  This category is closely tied to the Experience category, but is not synonymous.  This is an area where someone who is wise or seasoned can help a ticket.  Think Lloyd Bentsen.  Even Al Gore had stature for Bill Clinton.  Obama would add nothing to a ticket on this count.

All of which raises the question:  If Obama isn’t good enough to be VP, how could he be good enough to be President?
 


http://www.conservativeedge.com/readarticle.aspx?AID=4795





.

[RanterMaximus]

Obama doesn't even qualify for dog catcher.

[GoIsraelGo!]

Obama doesn't even qualify for dog catcher.

You are correct, and dog catchers loves dogs anyway, unlike Muslims. Obama was placed as the dem nominee by the Likes of George Soros and many other Evil Radicals with money and connections. The Radical Libs have been trying to get their radicals into the White House for the last 40 years. I hope they just give it up. If Radical Libs hate this Country so much, they should leave, but then that would ruin their goal of destroying this Country.

                                                                          Shalom from Dox

[RanterMaximus]

It still perplexes me how Hillary Clinton was thrown under the bus by the press and so many Democrats in favor of this sorry sack.  Not that I am defending her.

[Cyberella]

"The Radical Libs have been trying to get their radicals into the White House for the last 40 years. I hope they just give it up. If Radical Libs hate this Country so much, they should leave, but then that would ruin their goal of destroying this Country. "



I tend to go with this theory:
                                                                         
OBAMA THE JIHAD CANDIDATE
.
How long did it take Islam and their oil money to find a candidate for President of the United States ? 
 
As long as it took them to place a Senator from Illinois and Minnesota ?
 
The same amount of time to create a large Muslim enclave in Detroit ? 
 
The time it took them to build over 2,000 mosques in America ? 
 
The same amount of time required to place radical wahabbist clerics in our military and prisons as ‘chaplains’? 

Find a candidate who can get away with lying about their father being a ‘freedom fighter’ when he was actually part of the most corrupt and violent government in Kenya ’s history.
 
Find a candidate with close ties to The Nation of Islam and the violent Muslim overthrow in Africa , a candidate who is educated among white infidel Americans but hides his bitterness and anger behind a superficial toothy smile.
 
Find a candidate who changes his American name of Barry to the Muslim name of Barak Hussein Obama, and dares anyone to question his true ties under the banner of ‘racism’. 
Nurture this candidate in an atmosphere of anti-white American teaching and surround him with Islamic teachers. Provide him with a bitter, racist, anti-white, anti-American wife, and supply him with Muslim middle east connections and Islamic monies. 
Allow him to be clever enough to get away with his anti-white rhetoric and proclaim he will give $834 billion taxpayer dollars to the Muslim controlled United Nations for use in Africa .
 
Install your candidate in an atmosphere of deception because questioning him on any issue involving Africa or Islam would be seen as ‘bigoted racism’; two words too powerful to allow the citizenry to be informed of facts.
 
Allow your candidate to employ several black racist Nation of Islam Louis Farrakhan followers as members of his Illinois Senatorial and campaign staffs.
 
Where is the bloodhound American ‘free press’ who doggedly overturned every stone in the Watergate case? 
 
Where are our nation’s reporters that have placed every Presidential candidate under the microscope of detailed scrutiny; the same press who pursue Bush’s ‘Skull and Bones’ club or ran other candidates off with persistent detective and research work? 
 
Why haven’t ‘newsmen’ pursued the 65 blatant lies told by this candidate during the Presidential primaries? 
 
Where are the stories about this candidate’s cousin and the Muslim butchery in Africa ? 
 
Since when did our national press corps become weak, timid, and silent? 

Why haven’t they regaled us with the long list of socialists and communists who have surrounded this ‘out of nowhere’ Democrat candidate or that his church re-printed the Hamas Manifesto in their bulletin, and that his ‘close pastor friend and mentor’ met with Middle East terrorist Moammar Gaddafi, (Guide of the First of September Great Revolution of the Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya)?
 
ff0000px;">Why isn’t the American press telling us this candidate is supported by every Muslim organization in the world?
 
As an ultimate slap in the face, be blatant in the fact your candidate has ZERO interest in traditional American values and has the most liberal voting record in U.S. Senate history. 
Why has the American main stream media clammed-up on any negative reporting on Barak Hussein Obama? 
 
Why will they print Hillary Rodham Clinton’s name but never write his middle name? Is it not his name? 
 
Why, suddenly, is ANY information about this candidate not coming from main stream media, but from the blogosphere by citizens seeking facts and the truth? Why isn’t our media connecting the dots with Islam? 
 
Why do they focus on ‘those bad American soldiers’ while Islam slaughters non Muslims daily in 44 countries around the globe? 
 
Why does our media refer to Darfur as ‘ethnic cleansing’ instead of what it really is; Muslims killing non Muslims! There is enough strange, anti-American activity surrounding Barak Hussein Obama to peek the curiosity of any reporter. 
 
WHERE IS OUR INVESTIGATIVE MEDIA!? 
 
A formal plan for targeting America was devised three years after the Iranian revolution in 1982. The plan was summarized in a 1991 memorandum by Mohamed Akram, an operative of the global Muslim Brotherhood. ‘The process of settlement’ of Muslims in America , Akram explained, ‘is a civilization jihad process.’ This means that members of the Brotherhood must understand that their work in ‘America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.’
 
There is terrorism we can see, smell and fear, but there is a new kind of terror invading The United States in the form of Sharia law and finance. Condoning it is civilization suicide. 
Middle East Muslims are coming to America in record numbers and building hate infidel mosques, buying our corporations, suing us for our traditions, but they and the whole subject of Islam is white noise leaving uninformed Americans about who and what is really peaceful. 
 
Where is our investigative press? 
 
Any criticism of Islam or their intentions, even though Islamic leaders state their intentions daily around the globe, brings-forth a volley of ‘racist’ from the left-wing Democrat crowd. Lies and deception behind a master plan - the ingredients for ‘The Manchurian Candidate’ or the placement of an anti-American President in our nation’s White House?
 
 
Is it mere coincidence that an anti-capitalist run for President at the same time Islamic sharia finance and law is trying to make advancing strides into the United States ? 
 
Is it mere coincidence this same candidate wants to dis-arm our nuclear capability at a time when terrorist Muslim nations are expanding their nuclear weapons capability? 
Is it mere coincidence this candidate wants to reduce our military at a time of global jihad from Muslim nations? Change for America?
 
What change? To become another ‘nation of Islam’?
 
 
Rich Carroll 2008 
printed by permission 
Back to top       

[P J C]

It still perplexes me how Hillary Clinton was thrown under the bus by the press and so many Democrats in favor of this sorry sack.  Not that I am defending her.

The DNC wanted to be the party with the black candidate, that is why Hillary was undermined by her own stupid party. BTW, what is all this crap I see on TV that the Dems say they are more United than the Republicans. There is nothing further from the truth. I don't see any Huckabee supporters starting there own Obama websites because they were upset that Mccain won the primary. It is ridiculous.

[Cyberella]

It still perplexes me how Hillary Clinton was thrown under the bus by the press and so many Democrats in favor of this sorry sack.  Not that I am defending her.

The DNC wanted to be the party with the black candidate, that is why Hillary was undermined by her own stupid party. BTW, what is all this crap I see on TV that the Dems say they are more United than the Republicans. There is nothing further from the truth. I don't see any Huckabee supporters starting there own Obama websites because they were upset that Mccain won the primary. It is ridiculous.

If you snoop around the Puma and pro-Hillary sites, they are as mad as  h*ll- and they are planning some big surprises for Obama at the convention.


.

[P J C]

It still perplexes me how Hillary Clinton was thrown under the bus by the press and so many Democrats in favor of this sorry sack.  Not that I am defending her.

The DNC wanted to be the party with the black candidate, that is why Hillary was undermined by her own stupid party. BTW, what is all this crap I see on TV that the Dems say they are more United than the Republicans. There is nothing further from the truth. I don't see any Huckabee supporters starting there own Obama websites because they were upset that Mccain won the primary. It is ridiculous.

If you snoop around the Puma and pro-Hillary sites, they are as mad as  h*ll- and they are planning some big surprises for Obama at the convention.


.

It can only help McCain.