Save Western Civilization > Save Europe
Michael Savage WAS right about Russian-Georgian conflict!
Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks:
So it's alright for Russia to work for Israel's destruction because Israel supports Georgia?
Georgia has only existed since 1991. What motivated Russia to be aiding all the Muslim Nazi countries for 40 years prior to that?
IslamIsCancer:
--- Quote from: SerbChicago on August 14, 2008, 09:33:50 AM ---http://www.wbez.org/content.aspx?audioID=27675 Just click on play and you will listen very very very good interview with George Freidman founder of STRATFOR privat conctractor for US government.He talks about Russia,US,Georgia,Israel and KOSOVO.Please listen to it in full before living comment.You will hear mistake that US made and mistake that Israel is supporting Georgians and giving them weapons against Russians but asking and begging Russians not to give weapons to Iran and Syria.US department was wrong,Israel was wrong and Michael Savage as usual is RIGHT again.ONE MORE TIME LISTEN TO IT IN FULL BEFORE COMMENTING!
--- End quote ---
That guy is right, America shouldn't have shoved NATO up Russia's behind, they knew what they were doing.
Kahane-Was-Right BT:
Georgia sent in troops to a "breakaway province" OF GEORGIA
Russia used this as a pretext to attack/invade Georgia.
Russia also was instrumental in arranging that "breakaway province's" breakaway in the first place, from Georgia.
Russia appears unwilling to "let" certain former satellites out of its sphere of influence and to exercise any sovereignty whatsoever.
Seems a pretty open-shut case to me. Am I wrong about any of this?
Lubab:
--- Quote from: Kahane-Was-Right BT on August 14, 2008, 01:43:29 PM ---Georgia sent in troops to a "breakaway province" OF GEORGIA
Russia used this as a pretext to attack/invade Georgia.
Russia also was instrumental in arranging that "breakaway province's" breakaway in the first place, from Georgia.
Russia appears unwilling to "let" certain former satellites out of its sphere of influence and to exercise any sovereignty whatsoever.
Seems a pretty open-shut case to me. Am I wrong about any of this?
--- End quote ---
I think you might be on one point. It wasn't just "sending in troops"...they killed about 2,000 Russians. They drew the first blood.
P J C:
--- Quote from: Lubab on August 14, 2008, 04:25:04 PM ---
--- Quote from: Kahane-Was-Right BT on August 14, 2008, 01:43:29 PM ---Georgia sent in troops to a "breakaway province" OF GEORGIA
Russia used this as a pretext to attack/invade Georgia.
Russia also was instrumental in arranging that "breakaway province's" breakaway in the first place, from Georgia.
Russia appears unwilling to "let" certain former satellites out of its sphere of influence and to exercise any sovereignty whatsoever.
Seems a pretty open-shut case to me. Am I wrong about any of this?
--- End quote ---
I think you might be on one point. It wasn't just "sending in troops"...they killed about 2,000 Russians. They drew the first blood.
--- End quote ---
Russia still acted in an unexceptable manner, to a tiny "country". I don't care what anyone says. The Russians are not there for retaliation, the Russians are there for conquest.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version