From Nadia Matar's article:
"What the radical state-worshipers do not understand is that opposing the expulsion command would have sanctified, rather than harmed, the IDF. Massive civilian disobedience to prevent the expulsion crime would have only preserved the State of Israel in the Land of Israel."
I don't think Nadia believes the current State of Israel (that is, the government of Israel) is worth preserving or being obedient to, so I'm not 100% sure what that last sentence means.
Perhaps she's trying to convey the idea that even those who place primary importance on preserving the State, rather than Jewish sovereignty over all of the Land of Israel, would have been best served to massively resist the expulsion.
In any event, it's interesting to note the words 'massive civilian disobedience'. Where have we heard that before ?
Sounds like something taken directly from the JTF/Chaim Ben Pesach playbook !
Nadia clearly understands that in the final analysis, only vigorous resistance and massive civil disobedience will prevent further expulsions.
Bravo, Nadia.