Guns and Self-Defense > Guns/Firearms
Shalom
White Israelite:
--- Quote from: AryehYehudah on October 17, 2008, 03:45:37 AM ---Isn't it best to just train with the type of gun you intend to shoot? Some guns are not practical for all situations. Carrying a large .45 caliber may not be necessary on the city streets; however, out in the forest/wilderness, you can forget about a .38 saving your life against a charging angry, rabid or just adrenaline pumped bear or even a mountain lion. Beginner or expert, you should train for the situation you need.
I thought this was a good article.. I am not a gun expert, but have a basic interest. I, don't really use handguns, but I do plan on training soon.. I spend most time in forest, so I would like to start with larger handguns, myself, since fighting off wild animals, like grizzlies or large black bears usually would require it. Not that I go out of my way looking for this type of ordeal, but I have had a few run-ins! Of course, when Barack Hussein comes into power, the only wild animals you will have to really worry about hiding in the forest, are islamonazis.
http://www.xdtalk.com/forums/xd-45acp-discussion-room/69185-45-acp-beginner-3.html
--- End quote ---
.45 ACP is self sufficient for self defense, I would avoid 9mm.
I personally recommend a handgun in .40 S&W, preferrably Glock or Springfield XD.
--- Quote from: Pheasant on October 17, 2008, 10:47:04 AM ---I had this during my service and I can tell it is safe, easy to use and very robust.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HK_USP
The younger soldiers that were on training could handle it after a few days very well and they hit more often the target than with the old P1.
--- End quote ---
I own a USP, damn fine handgun, overengineered and very ergonomic to me :)
--- Quote from: Scriabin on October 17, 2008, 12:00:27 PM ---
--- Quote from: Americanhero on October 17, 2008, 11:58:10 AM ---http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=83165
--- End quote ---
Revolvers are simple and utterly reliable.
Glocks and other semi-autos are more complex and capable of jamming.
I like simplicity.
--- End quote ---
You ever seen the torture tests on Glocks and modern semi-autos? Military standard testing below
The HK USP is probably the most thoroughly tested pistol ever produced. The testing process of the USP, already extreme in exceeding strict NATO AC-225 Military Specification Standards, in many ways mirrors the regimen the HK SOCOM pistol was subjected to .
The barrel of the USP is cold-hammer forged from high-grade chromium steel, the same type of steel used in cannon barrels. During testing, a bullet was deliberately lodged in a USP barrel. Another cartridge was then fired into the obstructing bullet. The second bullet cleared the barrel, resulting in a barely noticeable bulge. The pistol was then fired for accuracy and the resulting group measured less than 2.5 inches at 25 meters.
Other less destructive tests reveal much about USP reliability and durability. Function testing a wide selection of ammunition types, one test gun fired more than 10,000 rounds without a single malfunction. That means no stove-pipes, no failures to feed o r eject; no jams! Endurance firings of test samples has passed 20,000 rounds of high performance .40 S&W ammo without any parts failures. Sever temperature tests required the USP to be frozen at -44 degrees F (-42 degrees C) and then fired, frozen again a nd quickly heated to 153 degrees F (67 degrees C), and then fired again. These temperature spectrum tests were continually repeated, and with no adverse effects on the USP.
Demanding NATO Mil-Spec mud and rain tests were conducted, again with the USP passing without difficulty. Water immersion and salt spray also presented no problems to the USP. Outside metal surfaces of the USP are covered with an extremely hard nitro-gas carburized and black oxidized finish.
All internal metal parts, including springs, are coated with a special Dow-Corning process that reduces friction and wear. Both the internal and external finishes have proved to be especially corrosion resistant. For more than two years, German Navy comba t divers have used the same process on weapons parts without any signs of rust.
Safety testing exceeded the ANSI/SAAMI requirements adopted in May 1990. These included dropping a USP with a primed cartridge and decocked hammer on a variety of surfaces without discharging. The USP easily surpassed these commercial requirements, as wel l as German police tests, including repeated drop tests from six feet, hammer first, onto a steel backed concrete slab. Proof round firing resulted in no cracks, deformations, or increase in head space. attempts to fire the USP pistol with an unlocked bre ech proved impossible.
The HK recoil reduction system (patent pending), a mechanical dual spring buffering device, is another feature common to the USP and the HK SOCOM pistol. During the USP testing phase, HK engineers discovered this innovative unit reduces the peak force act ing on the USP grip to less than 300 Newtons (66 pounds). Peak force shock on competing .40 caliber polymer and metal framed pistols climbed to more than 5000 Newtons (1102 pounds).
The primary benefit of low peak shock is a decrease in wear and tear on pistol components. Reduction in peak shock forces also contributes to softer recoil for the shooter, although these "felt recoil" values are much more subjective.
Excerpted from the 1993 Edition of Sentinel Magazine.
Testing Data
Information provided by HK, Incorporated
Tolerance Inspection Trigger Pull, firing pin energy and
protrusion, headspace, caliber,
velocities, etc.
Safety Inspection Controls and safeties
Proof firing (2 Winchester DP40 proof
rounds)
Targeting Zeroing (25 meters, POA/POI)
Ammunition compatibility
More than 85,000 rounds fired thus
far during testing of the USP40
Accuracy (USP40, 10 shots, 25 meters)
Most accurate (3.2 - 3.9 in.)
Reliability/functional test 20,000 round reliability test
Fired in various attitudes, checked
every 1,000 rounds for cracked or
broken parts and for accuracy.
slide manually cycled 1,000 times
after each 10,000 rounds fired.
No normal wear detected in less than
5,100 rounds
USP40 and USP9 perfect record through
first half of the test. Second half
of test ongoing at time of writing
(This document
was printed in August of 1993.)
Barrel obstruction test Live round fired with projectile
positioned at forcing cone and
30mm into muzzle.
No damage to pistol.
Accuracy unaffected.
Drop tests According to SAMMI/ANSI Z299.5/1990 and
German BMI test methods. Primed case in
chamber, 13 dummy rounds loaded, hammer cocked,
safety/decocking lever set to "fire"
All six sixes of weapon, plus 45 degree top
muzzle, onto rubber from height of 4 feet.
Six times onto cocked hammer onto steel/concrete
from height of 3 and 6.7 feet.
No ignition or primer indent permitted. Pistol must
function normally after tests are completed.
Noise level test Measured in dB (A) height of muzzle, 1 meter front
and left of muzzle.
Winchester and Remington 180gr JHP=139 dB
Remington 155gr JHP=143.5 dB
Fouling test 1,000 rounds w/o cleaning or lubrication
Comparable to S&W 4006
Environment test (NATO AC225-D14) Low temp (-46 C, -51 F)
High temp (63 C, 145 F)
Thermal shock (-46 to +63 C)
Mud bath (10 minutes exposure)
Particulate (sand) (10 minute exposure)
Freezing rain (1 hour to -46 C)
http://www.streetpro.com/usp/torture.html
Plus you get more capacity with a semi-auto.
Scriabin:
--- Quote from: White Israelite on October 18, 2008, 10:01:30 PM ---
--- Quote from: Scriabin on October 17, 2008, 12:00:27 PM ---Revolvers are simple and utterly reliable.
Glocks and other semi-autos are more complex and capable of jamming.
I like simplicity.
--- End quote ---
You ever seen the torture tests on Glocks and modern semi-autos? Military standard testing below
--- End quote ---
Revolvers are simple and reliable.
Furthermore, this guy is asking for a starter gun.
White Israelite:
--- Quote from: Scriabin on October 19, 2008, 12:13:19 AM ---
--- Quote from: White Israelite on October 18, 2008, 10:01:30 PM ---
--- Quote from: Scriabin on October 17, 2008, 12:00:27 PM ---Revolvers are simple and utterly reliable.
Glocks and other semi-autos are more complex and capable of jamming.
I like simplicity.
--- End quote ---
You ever seen the torture tests on Glocks and modern semi-autos? Military standard testing below
--- End quote ---
Revolvers are simple and reliable.
Furthermore, this guy is asking for a starter gun.
--- End quote ---
A semi-auto is fine for a starter gun and he can obtain one under 500 dollars.
A revolver isn't immune to problems, i've seen cylinders misalign.
Here's how you field strip a glock, very easy and barely any parts.
less than 10 seconds
Scriabin:
--- Quote from: Dan Ben Noah on November 11, 2008, 10:17:23 PM ---
Thanks, this is all very helpful. Any recommendations on some good starter rifles/shotguns?
--- End quote ---
The Remington 870 Express:
Americanhero1:
--- Quote from: Scriabin on November 11, 2008, 10:57:06 PM ---
--- Quote from: Dan Ben Noah on November 11, 2008, 10:17:23 PM ---
Thanks, this is all very helpful. Any recommendations on some good starter rifles/shotguns?
--- End quote ---
The Remington 870 Express:
--- End quote ---
That is a good one
I have this Mossberg 500 Persuader
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version