I've always felt that the invective against blacks by JTF is not helpful. That's not to say that much of JTF's dislike of black culture is wrong. It's just that most people lack the ability to recognize the difference between racism and legitimate criticism of the practices of a certain ethnic group. Chaim is quite right when he says that we're not racists, but it doesn't matter when we are a small political movement aspiring to grow, and we are perceived as racists. So for that reason, my criticism of Obama in my opinions to newspapers or in conversation, has avoided the fact that he is black. I attack his associates, his policies, and what he says. This is more constructive, I think.
Now even doing this does not guarantee that you won't be labelled a racist. In one paragraph that I submitted to the Cincinatti Enquirer, I attacked Obama's policies, his associates, and so on. Some [censored] responded by calling me a racist. So responded back, asking this person who said anything about race? I told him that he was the one who brought up race. I asked him if he was sure (since he brought it up) whether he was a racist. He never responded back.
You have to meet such accusations head on. If you are not a racist (and I'm assuming that you're not), then you can't let such accusations go. Make them explain to you why you are a racist. But again, getting back to my first point, people are not smart enough to recognize the difference between the legitimate criticism of certain cultural tendencies and racism. So personally, when criticizing Obama, I would leave out the fact that he is black.