Like I said before: Human rights are a sick bolschewist invention and a form of replacement theology for our wicked leftists.
In this case we can see it very clearly. They choose the well-beeing of a murderous arch-quranimal, that would grant them not a single civil right, abouve the naked survival of their fellow British people.
This is the real nature of organizations like "Amnesty International" and "Liberty".
Imo not the quranimals, but all kind of leftists are the main problem. The quranimals are only a symptom of the real illness called socialism.
Of cause the following issue shows clearly where we find the enemy. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So the Financial times reported yesterday:
Law lords approve Qatada deportation
By Jimmy Burns and Megan Murphy
Published: February 18 2009 11:29 | Last updated: February 19 2009 02:10
The strategy of using diplomatic agreements to deport suspected terrorists won the backing of the UK’s highest court yesterday in the case of a radical Islamic preacher once described as al-Qaeda’s “spiritual ambassador” in Europe.
The law lords unanimously ruled that Abu Qatada could be sent back to his native Jordan, where he faces jail for a series of terrorist offences, in spite of the risk that evidence used against him may have been extracted by torture.
The cleric’s legal team said it would take his case to the European Court of Human Rights, potentially delaying his deportation by months if not years.
Jordan is one of a number of Middle Eastern and north African countries with which the UK has signed controversial “memorandums of understanding”, which the government says will protect deported suspects from torture or ill-treatment.
Human rights groups such as Liberty and Amnesty International, however, have condemned the agreements as worthless, forged with unaccountable regimes that have appalling human rights records.The government has waged a long, and costly, battle to remove Mr Qatada, who is widely considered one of the most influential Islamic extremists in Europe.
Jacqui Smith, the home secretary, said she was “delighted” with the judges’ decision, which also also paves the way for the deportation of two Algerians under similar agreements.
“The lords’ decision highlights the threat these individuals pose to our nation’s security and vindicates our efforts to remove them,” Ms Smith said.
“My top priority is to protect public safety and ensure national security ... I am keen to deport these dangerous individuals as soon as I can.”
Amnesty International urged ministers not to take the judgment as a “green light” to hand more people over to regimes where they risked unfair trial and torture.
“Diplomatic assurances are completely unenforceable and as such cannot be relied upon,” said Nicola Duckworth, the group’s Europe and central Asia programme director.The law lords stressed on Wednesday that each case involving memorandums of understanding would depend on its individual facts, as assessed by a dedicated panel known as the Special Immigration Appeals Tribunal.
Lord Phillips said in the landmark 105-page ruling that the prohibition on using evidence obtained by torture was not “primarily” because such evidence was unreliable or unfair but because the “state must stand firm against the conduct that has produced the evidence”.
“It does not require this state, the United Kingdom, to retain in this country, to the detriment of national security, a terrorist suspect ... What is relevant is the degree of risk that [Abu Qatada] will suffer a flagrant denial of justice if he is deported to Jordan.”
Mr Qatada was initially detained in 2002, when the SIAC described him as a “truly dangerous individual” who had been involved in activities associated with al-Qaeda
Source:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/98504074-fdad-11dd-932e-000077b07658.html