Which would be worse, if Obama were naive or evil? You can argue that it doesn't really matter, it's what he does that counts. My opinion is that he is an evil person pretending to be naive.
There was something he said repeatedly during the campaign which troubled me then and troubles me now. He said something to the effect of 'the notion that not talking to a country is a form of punishment is absurd'.
It is absurd, but his premise was all wrong. We weren't talking to Iran because we wanted to punish them. We were not talking to Iran because there was nothing to be gained by talking to them.
We told them to stop enriching uranium. They said "no". It seems to me like there is nothing left to talk about. What are we supposed to say to them now, "PLEASE stop enriching uranium"?
Liberals do this all the time. They base their arguments on false premises.
I wonder if Obama would have spoken to Hitler (ym"sh). Would Obama have said in 1941 that America should talk to Hitler because not talking to Hitler is not an effective punishment?
What kind of nonsense is that? Now he wants to be chummy with Iran, chummy with the muslim world. He wants to send $900,000,000 to the arab nazis of Gaza. Hamas is considered a terrorist organization in America. How can he justify sending them money. Does he really think that the money would help the arabs rebuild their houses? The arabs have never built anything!
He has been president for a little over a month and look at what he has done so far. Where will America be after 48 months?