YOU ARE 100% CORRECT ABOUT THIS. You read my mind. First, they know no one will disagree (not even the USA and Israel) with putting people from the Congo, Rwanda, Cambodia and Sudan on trial for war crimes. Who would feel bad for some leader in the Congo who butchered babies? Second, they know third world countries do not have the resources to fight these charges legally. The final and most important part about this is the precedent it sets. Since these are all lawyers filing these charges, they understand precedent. They can say, "well we put people in the 3rd world in jail for the same thing, is it fair that a wealthy nation get away with the same thing?" Even though it is apples and oranges, they will use this argument. Also remember that Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that international law should be considered as precedent in the USA. This is the stance of a madwoman.
Once they have the precedent, then all the leftist lawyers can start filing charges. Isarel is on the top of the list but so is the Bush Administration. The liberals and their Muslim lovers would love to jail or execute the former Bush Administration. Third on the list would be former right wing governments in south America.
These are terrible institutions that need an earthquake to hit them during a trial....yesterday.