General Category > Ask JTF
Ask JTF for Sunday, April 5, 2009
MasterWolf1:
Hello Brother Chaim
Now why is no one questioning Obama for belly crawling to Muz terrorist Iran like a wimp, showing what kind of an animal he is, he gave 900 million dollars to Hamas from our money, he called the Taliban moderate yet no one is quetioning it? I know Bush has done some pretty bad things in is time but if Bush did 1/100th of what Obama did the media and everyone would of had a feast out of it, are people that blind, embarrassed or naive? Obama is setting us up for something that will make 911 look like a birthday party and there is a tremendous un eased feeling. What is your take on this?
Maimonides:
Shalom Chaim and Thank you as always for your hard work and answering my questions.
Do you eat rice or beans on Pesach like Sefardic Jews?
When the Kahanists take over Israel will rice and beans be considered Chametz and banned from stores on Pesach?
Minuteman:
Dear Chaim,
If the Founding Fathers of the United States were put in charge of the U.S. today, how do you think they would handle the problems of this country, and what do you think would be the response from the liberial establishment?
God Bless America, Israel, and the West
Minuteman
Abben:
Hello Chaim. I remember hearing on an old JTF show in qptv that you said the muslims cannot even touch a pig. When us Jews can touch a pig but we are not allowed to eat them. Is it true that the muzzies cannot touch them and why thanks. G-D bless
Secularbeliever:
Shalom Chaim
I was very encouraged by Lieberman's statement that Israel is not bound by The Annapolis conference agreements (this was the conference where Livni entered through the servants quarters so the Saudis would not have to be offended by seeing her). I know Lieberman is a fraud and wants to give away much of the Galillee and Negev but I think the precedent is great.
Til now these agreements have been one way death traps for Israel. When Oslo first started supporters said if the Arabs did not honor their agreements Israel would retake the areas given up to the savages. Of course we know how well that worked out.
While I have no problem with stating the Land of Israel is ours for reasons of history, bible, etc. I think a simpler look at contract law is called for. In the Roadmap (which Lieberman did say Israel is bound to) Israel promised various things such as freezing settlement activity. The Arabs promised to fight terrorism. Everyone remembers what Israel promised but nobody cares or remembers that the Arabs have never fought terrorism.
It is a simple principle of contracts that they are only effective and binding if both parties abide by it. If I am renting a house to a tenant he has a right to live there only as long as he pays his rent. If he stops paying rent he cannot say but you said I can live here. Same with the Arabs. They made an agreement but did not live up to it. Their chance came and went. They can lament later about the opportunity they squandered but now Jews have no reason to restrict the rights of Jews to live anywhere in the Land of Israel.
By the way what about honoring agreements made by Jews to themselves. The Golan has been formally made part of Israel and Jerusalem was made the indivisible capital. Yet both are being negotiated by subsequent governments. Why are future governments not bound by those decisions of former governments?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version