Adrian yes I agree with you that some versions of G-d can allow for such things. However that G-d would have to be amoral, because if all outcomes from choices occur, then there is no merit in being good and no real harm in being evil.
I believe that the universe is from G-d (created through directed natural processes) but is not G-d itself.
Well if all outcomes from choices occur, that would be hugely energy intensive since there would be an infinite variety of everything, where would the energy come to drive something like that.? It would seem to me that there is only one reality and only if one could go back it time, ( and it may be impossible to go back in time ), could one create a second reality and one can only create a second reality, if can actually change something and if can not change anything one does not create a second reality. Even in a universe where every time a person made a choice that created a new reality and every reality went on to exist independently, that does not violate moral principles in the sense all the actors in this scenario are still having free will to make choices and if one thinks of all powerful god, he could have installed a device in to the scenario that works like a gyro scope in an aircraft to maintain balance so if the choices made start to remove free will from the equation, that gyroscope starts to kick in to restore free will. In fact what is interesting about Judaism is that as I understand it, the Messianic figure is not rigidly defined to the extent it may be different persons at different times and exhibiting different characteristic. If one thinks of Winston Churchill, he is so much the right person at the right time and one had a belief in Messianic personages, it would be hard not to have suspicions that he was one such personage.
Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer