General Category > Ask JTF
Ask JTF for Sunday, May 17, 2009
Zelhar:
Shalom rav Chaim
When you appeal for a broad public support in favor of an attack on Iran's doomsday project, I think it would be better to come with a uniting, non confrontational message. While it is true that Israel should have bombed Iran a decade ago, and that Israeli leaders are major wimps, this is a matter that belongs in another video. If the goal is to unite Israelis in favor of taking action, then insulting and ridiculing all past and present Israeli leadership is not going to work.
I think that for the purpose of promoting this single most urgent issue, the message should be limited to the most relevant points:
1. Whatever repercussion we might suffer from launching the attack are negligible comparing to the alternative of facing a nuclear Iran.
2. We can count out America and any other foreign power, they are not going to stop Iran.
3. We must disregard whatever warning or ultimatums coming from Hussein Osama. He is a hostile degenerate beast, but his capacity to actually harm Israel amounts to words.
Israel basically hearts herself by obeying to the commands of this beast.
5. Whenever a counter terrorism operation is needed in Gaza or Lebanon, Iran would threat a nuclear war. This would completely paralyze Israel from taking any counter terrorist
operation anywhere.
6. We can't rely on the MAD principle. There is no guaranty Iran wouldn't commit a nuclear suicide bombing against us.
7. The expectation for a timely regime change in Iran and a subsequent disarmament and peaceful relations is pure fantasy.
I think my comment is more about how to say what you say than what to say. When you try to convey a double message, one regarding the Irani issue, the other is settig Hayamin Haamiti as the alternative to the failing parties, you get IMO a combined total result that is less than if you had one single message.
Chai:
Dear Chaim
what you said 2 weeks ago about keeping kosher is quite true the Jewish person i was referring to actually married a non Jew.. so you are on the money , therefore that's not something i can really tell him is it?... you were on the money.
CorrieDeservedIt:
Shalom Chaim
I'm almost always listening to old broadcast of JTF, I was listening to a show from sometime in July of 2003
and I noticed you mentioned or spoke in a somewhat positive tone about Ron Paul you described him as a real right winger. I'm sure either his policies changed or his running for 2008 and support from Størm Frønt have something to do with your current stance I was just curious in knowing what change or event made you change quickly. and of course I detest Ron Paul and his conspiracy wacko supporters.
PS.
What is your opinion on the metrocard fare increase here in New York?Also do you think the extra fare hikes are to increase the salaries of these incompetent schvartza bus drivers?
Thanks again, John.
Sefardic Panther:
Shalom Mr Ben Pesach,
Do you think the Torah commentaries of Flavius Josephus and Philo Judaeus are valid or are they too hellenistic?
Toda raba
Mishmaat:
Shalom Chaim,
The Tawana Brawley case allowed the racial racketeering con-artist, Al Sharpton, to gain prominence. For those who are not familiar with the case; Tawana Brawley, a [censored], was engaged in the age old African custom of smearing feces all over her body. She also wrote racial slurs on her body as well and then proceeded to crawl into a garbage bag in Wappinger Falls, a town south of Poughkeepsie. The delusional Brawley then concocted this obscure African fairy tale. She lied to law enforcement and claimed that she'd been abducted by four white men, held for four days, and repeatedly raped. The horror of this alleged "crime" created an instant sensation.
Sharpton and two great African legal geniuses, C. Vernon Mason and Alton Maddox, rushed to become the "advisers" to Brawley and her mother. Painstaking examinations of the physical evidence showed conclusively that Brawley just fabricated the entire story. Mason, Maddox and Sharpton had known this early on but kept the story alive to serve their own ends. Sharpton himself said, "If we win this case, we'll be the biggest n*ggers in New York."
Creatures like Sharpton, who make a living by stirring up racial resentments, should not be given any legitimacy nor should they be tolerated. Tolerance of such figures has ultimately resulted in someone of their ilk being elected to the highest office in the U.S. It is truly a tragedy.
Chaim, may you share with us an African-Action story?
As always, you're a gentleman and a scholar.
Kol tuv.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version