Clinton OK with Iranian A-Bomb offers Nuclear Umbrella

[muman613]

Clinton and American policy in the Middle East is completely F*CK*D UP. At this point in time it seems that Clinton and America is OK with Iranian nuclear weapons. Her offer of strength was that America would "protect" its allies with some kind of Nuclear Shield {which we know doesn't even work}.

We must start screaming louder and louder that America cannot turn its back on the Jewish state. Let us consider what vocal protest can be made to let our deaf and dumb leaders know what we need. I have never seen American leaders so evil and close-minded to truth. These 'leaders' are leading us to slaughter.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/132527

Israel Unhappy with Clinton Remarks on Defense Vs. Iran
Av 1, 5769, 22 July 09 09:44
by Gil Ronen

(Israelnationalnews.com) U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Wednesday that if Iran continued with its nuclear program despite President Barack Obama's overtures, her country would respond by increasing its military aid to friendly nations in the region.
Israel, which prefers an offensive approach to the Iranian danger rather than a defensive one, was unhappy with the remarks.

In 2007, the U.S. agreed to provide weapons worth at least $16 billion to its allies in the Gulf, including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. Clinton said this could be taken a step further and the U.S. could choose to further "upgrade the defense of our partners in the region".

"If the US extends a defense umbrella over the region, if we do even more to support the military capacity of those in the Gulf, it's unlikely that Iran will be any stronger or safer because they won't be able to intimidate and dominate as they apparently believe they can once they have a nuclear weapon," said Mrs. Clinton in Thailand, ahead of an Asian security conference to be held in the Thai resort of Phuket.

Israel unhappy
Mrs. Clinton said that her country "still hold(s) the door open" to talks with Tehran, but added the "nuclear clock is ticking". She also reiterated a statement she made several weeks ago, regarding "crippling action" that could also be taken against Iran.

"I heard without enthusiasm the American declarations according to which the U.S. will defend their allies in the event that Iran uses nuclear weapons, as if they were already resigned to such a possibility," Israeli Intelligence Services Minister Dan Meridor said.

"This is a mistake," he added. "We cannot act now by assuming that Iran will be able to arm itself with a nuclear weapon, but [rather] to prevent such a possibility."

Clinton clarifies
Clinton later clarified her remarks and explained that they did not signal a change in U.S. policy. "I am simply pointing out that Iran needs to understand that its pursuit of nuclear weapons will not advance its security," she said. "It faces the prospect, if it pursues nuclear weapons, of sparking an arms race in the region.”

NPR quoted Flynt Leverett, a senior fellow at the New America Foundation in Washington, D.C., as saying that Clinton's idea of providing a defense umbrella over the Gulf is not a new one. She discussed it during the Democratic Party’s primaries has mentioned it again since then, the expert claimed.

Leverett explained that "The Israelis' preferred way to stop [the Iranian nuclear program] would be to launch a military strike. For them, this is troubling because it raises questions about whether the U.S. would ever be willing to launch a strike or to let them do it.”

Robert Malley, an analyst with the International Crisis Group, also told NPR that Secretary Clinton's comments do not mean that the U.S. has accepted a nuclear-armed Iran as inevitable.

[Sentinel For Truth]

"If the US extends a defense umbrella over the region, if we do even more to support the military capacity of those in the Gulf, it's unlikely that Iran will be any stronger or safer because they won't be able to intimidate and dominate as they apparently believe they can once they have a nuclear weapon," said Mrs. Clinton in Thailand, ahead of an Asian security conference to be held in the Thai resort of Phuket.

This has got to be one of the most insane sentences ever uttered by any U.S. Secreatary of State in history, even more shocking than Neville Chamberlain's "peace in our time" statement because at least he thought he had negotiated with Hitler in good faith, Clinton is permitting Iran to get nukes knowing full well that the likely outcome at some point will be a massive war in which they will be used!  The implication is that our military industrial complex will make a fortune out of arming all the other countries in the region, so it'll be a hugely profitable venture to let Iran get nukes.  This administration thinks a nuclear armed Iran and massive war in the middle east is all a big game for profit!

Hitlery Clinton is someone who would sell her own mother to the devil.

At the rate this is going, my estimation is that there will be another world war within 5-7 years where the global population may be reduced by half.

[Ithaca-37]

Somebody needs to educate Hillary on this obvious:  The famed "MAD" concept only works when both sides are interested in surviving.  On the other hand, the entire middle-east is populated by people who straps explosives to their own children.  MAD will not work under these circumstances.

37