0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
You're right! The performance is great. I would buy it also!! But I always loved the V8 rumble. No V6 has that rumble. I don't care if it has flow masters or not. I used to have a 1979 Trans Am 6.6 Liter, V8. It had that rumble
How about them making one that runs on E85, or better yet that is all-electric or runs on some completely renewable/mass-producable fuel such as soybean oil?
Quote from: Aces High on May 15, 2010, 08:15:11 PMYou're right! The performance is great. I would buy it also!! But I always loved the V8 rumble. No V6 has that rumble. I don't care if it has flow masters or not. I used to have a 1979 Trans Am 6.6 Liter, V8. It had that rumbleWas that 79 trans am v8 stock?
Quote from: Abben on May 15, 2010, 09:50:59 PMQuote from: Aces High on May 15, 2010, 08:15:11 PMYou're right! The performance is great. I would buy it also!! But I always loved the V8 rumble. No V6 has that rumble. I don't care if it has flow masters or not. I used to have a 1979 Trans Am 6.6 Liter, V8. It had that rumbleWas that 79 trans am v8 stock? Yes Abben. My Trans Am was stock with a 403 cubic inch engine.
Quote from: Aces High on May 16, 2010, 07:06:52 AMQuote from: Abben on May 15, 2010, 09:50:59 PMQuote from: Aces High on May 15, 2010, 08:15:11 PMYou're right! The performance is great. I would buy it also!! But I always loved the V8 rumble. No V6 has that rumble. I don't care if it has flow masters or not. I used to have a 1979 Trans Am 6.6 Liter, V8. It had that rumbleWas that 79 trans am v8 stock? Yes Abben. My Trans Am was stock with a 403 cubic inch engine. Do you mean the oldsmobile 403 engine? I do not know if back in 79 if GM was using corporate motors in their cars.
I remember my friends cherry 73 Camaro which had a 350 V8... That car was awesome.. And my friend kept it clean.This sorta reminds me of my friends car: