Re: "I will always support the interests of the White population first and foremost"
In my view, this is one of those mellifluous cliches which is meaningless.
I base my statement on the fact that the words "the interests of the White population" which are to be supported "first and foremost" by the poster are forever in a state of flux, and therefore undefined.
There are White populations spread over the globe in various nations and cultures, each with their own world views and values.
To attempt to portray the French, Germans, Spaniards, English, Czechs, Danes, Russians, Icelanders, etc., as possessing a common interest based solely on "Global White Race Consciousness" defies reason.
(For the sake of limiting my argument in the forum, I deliberately am passing over disagreements among Caucasian peoples themselves as to the definition of "White".)
Questions:
Suppose, hypothetically, that "The White Population" gathers to meet and debate matters of importance, votes to disagree with the position(s) taken by the poster, and then adopts official policies, laws, and guidelines repugnant to the poster's personal values? ...
How then can the poster still claim to "always support the interests of the White population"?
Answer:
He can't.
In such a scenario, the poster will then be forced to stop concealing his real intentions and actual motivations.
He fully intends to dictate to all others that which he alone defines as the interests of the White population, motivated by his personal doctrines of White Separatism and White Supremacy.
Of course, no other personal viewpoints or doctrinal variations could be allowed or tolerated from within the White population under such conditions.
The poster, in stating his support for both a population and a value system which are indefinable and neither united nor in accord with each other, seeks to conceal from himself, as well as all others, his own psychological makeup, which is that he, and he alone, intends to define the "interests of the White population" and he then fully intends to use whichever means he deems necessary to force his views on everyone else.
Which, is just fine by me -- but these "lofty" sounding statements about "loyalty and support to White interests" are less than credible and have got to go.
Sounds like propaganda drivel.