The Worldwide Crisis of Islam > The Truth About Islam

Al Qaeda Will Nuke US in Late September

<< < (3/4) > >>

NeverMore:

--- Quote from: Rhuan on September 20, 2006, 02:49:03 PM ---As far as I know it really does just take two large enough lumps or uranium bein held to gether for a few seconds to create a nuclear explosion, and the size required isn't all that big.

Therefore, it really isn't complex to create a nuclear explosion if you don't mind dying in it, it's only if you want to detonate it remotely that it actually becomes complex to make, because then you have to have conventional explosives to blast the two pieces together, and make sure they touch for long enough, and of course you also need the detonation mechanism.

--- End quote ---

dude, its a whole science its not holding two chunks of uranium bringing together and lighting up with a cigarette lighter hehe.. not at all.. the main problem is how to get enriched uranium- its virtually impossible to acquire, just look at iran, how desperately they try to enrich uranium, and with years of research they are still some years away from it. look how much time it took for manhatten project to succeed, and think that these arabs dont have the jewish brains and all the best scientists the world can offer, the most they have is osama trying to solve the equations for the bomb or something.

here is some basic knowledge:
http://science.howstuffworks.com/nuclear-bomb.htm

Rhuan:
I knew a lot of that stuff already, but thanks anyway.

I was referring to two pieces of enriched uranium (235). I suppose I missed out a little bit, but I didn't oversimplify it by much.

Scriabin:

--- Quote from: NeverMore on September 20, 2006, 03:24:49 PM ---
--- Quote from: Rhuan on September 20, 2006, 02:49:03 PM ---As far as I know it really does just take two large enough lumps or uranium bein held to gether for a few seconds to create a nuclear explosion, and the size required isn't all that big.

Therefore, it really isn't complex to create a nuclear explosion if you don't mind dying in it, it's only if you want to detonate it remotely that it actually becomes complex to make, because then you have to have conventional explosives to blast the two pieces together, and make sure they touch for long enough, and of course you also need the detonation mechanism.

--- End quote ---

dude, its a whole science its not holding two chunks of uranium bringing together and lighting up with a cigarette lighter hehe.. not at all.. the main problem is how to get enriched uranium- its virtually impossible to acquire, just look at iran, how desperately they try to enrich uranium, and with years of research they are still some years away from it. look how much time it took for manhatten project to succeed, and think that these arabs dont have the jewish brains and all the best scientists the world can offer.

--- End quote ---
I mostly agree.  However, because of the Manhattan Project, nuclear science is now a major field...with a lot of muslims studying it.

The Manhattan Project took so long because it was NEW technology.  The technology is no longer new and is therefore MUCH easier to reproduce. 

Of course, building a nuclear bomb is VERY difficult, but I do not think impossible.

Cuba and Mexico are hostile towards us.  Cuba is in bed with Russia and Iran, and all of these countries want us dead.  Could not a device be assembled in Cuba (or Mexico), shipped to a major American port on an unassuming vessel and then detonated?   Who says that such a device will even have to touch American soil?

Rhuan:
GEtting the enriched uranium is difficult, but after that... And the suggestion is that Osama bought a certain something in Russia...

NeverMore:

--- Quote from: Rhuan on September 20, 2006, 03:50:29 PM ---GEtting the enriched uranium is difficult, but after that... And the suggestion is that Osama bought a certain something in Russia...

--- End quote ---

who knows maybe it was Israel who sold it to him  :D
if someone sold enriched uranium, iran would have got it long ago.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version