« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Shalom  (Read 1932 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dan Ben Noah

  • Full JTFer
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
Shalom
« on: November 04, 2010, 08:03:18 PM »
Shalom
« Last Edit: June 24, 2016, 11:49:14 PM by Dan Ben Noah »
Logged
Jeremiah 16:19 O Lord, Who are my power and my strength and my refuge in the day of trouble, to You nations will come from the ends of the earth and say, "Only lies have our fathers handed down to us, emptiness in which there is nothing of any avail!

Zechariah 8:23 So said the Lord of Hosts: In those days, when ten men of all the languages of the nations shall take hold of the skirt of a Jewish man, saying, "Let us go with you, for we have heard that God is with you."

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Naturalist Rejects Natural Selection, Appeals to Chaos
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2010, 10:52:42 PM »
Quote from: Dan Ben Noah on November 04, 2010, 08:03:18 PM
http://www.icr.org/article/5707/

Since its inception, Charles Darwin's story that life evolved in response to environmental pressures has not been supported by what is actually observed in nature. Despite this, it has been universally taught as accurate science since shortly after the publication of his On the Origin of Species in 1859.

Some researchers have rejected Darwin's imaginative evolutionary mechanism of natural selection on scientific grounds, instead favoring the biblical historical account of origins. Others have rejected it but are looking for a naturalistic replacement.1 Among the latter, at least one researcher has chosen a unique "explanation" for how evolutionary change takes place.

According to Keith Bennett, an evolutionary paleoecologist at Queen's University Belfast, natural selection plus time does not add up to evolutionary change, contradicting Darwin's 150-year-old central thesis. He instead offers the replacement idea that evolution just happens. In his view, it proceeds chaotically, perhaps as a result of coincidental genetic restructuring, and is therefore unpredictable.   

So what?

None of this denies the fact that it happened!    He is arguing about the MECHANISM by which it took place.   He accepts that it happened, that evolution happened, just like all scientists do.   

Not that I'm saying his is the best model - I don't think so - but just saying even if you accepted his model, you're an evolutionist!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »