Torah and Jewish Idea > Torah and Jewish Idea

Shalom

<< < (2/2)

wonga66:
Are you going to believe in a PhD scientist who is an actual atheist?

Or are you going to more credence to an equally qualified PhD scientist who not only believes in a Creator, but in the Torah too?

Kahane-Was-Right BT:

--- Quote from: wonga66 on January 26, 2011, 06:41:16 PM ---Are you going to believe in a PhD scientist who is an actual atheist?

Or are you going to more credence to an equally qualified PhD scientist who not only believes in a Creator, but in the Torah too?

--- End quote ---

LOL, this has to be the dumbest argument yet because that scientist you say supposedly 'believes in Torah' actually believes in Yeshu!  (Is that what you call Torah)?    So by your logic, that erodes his credibility entirely.

But supposing it was a religious Jew we were talking about (which it isn't in this case), it's still a terrible argument because having a correct belief or being a righteous or religious person does not make them a good scientist or make them automatically correct about anything.   No one gets an assumption of being flawless just because they practice the correct religion or have good beliefs.    Of course you believe in "daas teyray" so you probably do think that being a great scholar of Judaism makes people infallible, but to me that is idolatry.

wonga66:
Since you're talking about the jaw and its supposed evolution, re the change from the reptilian jaw bone to the mammalian TMJ:

"....some reptile scrapped the original hinge of its lower jaw and replaced it by a new one at a different point. Then some of the bones on each side of the lower jaw broke away from the biggest one. The jaw bone to which the lower jaw on each side was originally attached is supposed to have forced its way in to the middle part of the ear, dragging with it three of the lower jaw bones, and these together with the reptile middle ear bone formed themselves into a completely new outfit. Evolutionists cannot explain how the incipient mammals contrived to eat while jaw was being rehinged, or to hear while the middle and inner parts of the ear were being rebuilt.....it is indeed pathetic that educated men should believe that changes such as the above took place in the past by the slow action of natural forces."


Since a solid scientific case has been made by theistic PhD scientists for a special creation less than 10,000 years ago, you really shouldn't feel obliged to remain wed to the less than solid case of atheistic PhD scientists for an accidental universe billions of years old, the sole reason for which is that is how long evolution is presumed to even start to operate!

Kahane-Was-Right BT:
LOL

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page