Author Topic: McCains Wrong Stance on Enhanced Interrogation Techniques  (Read 385 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
McCains Wrong Stance on Enhanced Interrogation Techniques
« on: May 17, 2011, 09:43:35 PM »
Many years ago I was of the opinion that 'torture' otherwise known as 'enhanced interrogation techniques' were not useful and had the potential to turn public opinion against the government. Today I am of the belief that these advanced methods of interrogation, including so-called 'water-boarding' is an effective and necessary tool to be used by our national security system.

Lately Mr. John McCain, the one-time Republican presidential candidate {Thank Hashem he did not win, even though I voted for this puke} has been making a lot of press in trying to deny that these 'enhanced interrogation techniques' assisted in the hunt for Osama Bin Laden. Of course we all know that McCain himself was subjected to torture at the hands of the Vietnamese during the Vietnam war and thus his opinion is tainted by his experience.

But it is appearing more and more that these techniques did assist in the hunt for Bin Laden...

This article from FOX discusses this issue and Rick Santorums statement that John McCain is clueless when it comes to this issue.


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/05/17/state/n143246D64.DTL

Santorum: McCain doesn't understand interrogation
By DONNA CASSATA, Associated Press
Tuesday, May 17, 2011


(05-17) 17:07 PDT WASHINGTON, CA (AP) --

Former Sen. Rick Santorum said Tuesday that Sen. John McCain, who spent 5 1/2 years enduring brutal treatment at the hands of his North Vietnamese captors, doesn't know how effective waterboarding and other harsh interrogation techniques can be. The Republican presidential contender insisted the tactics led the United States to al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden.

McCain, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said in a speech last week that waterboarding al-Qaida's No. 3 leader, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, did not provide information that led to bin Laden's compound in Pakistan.

McCain said he asked CIA Director Leon Panetta for the facts, and that the hunt for bin Laden did not begin with fresh information from Mohammed. In fact, the name of bin Laden's courier, Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti, came from a detainee held in another country.

"Not only did the use of enhanced interrogation techniques on Khalid Sheikh Mohammed not provide us with key leads on bin Laden's courier, Abu Ahmed, it actually produced false and misleading information," McCain said.

In an interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt on Tuesday, Santorum said McCain was wrong.

"Everything I've read shows that we would not have gotten this information as to who this man was if it had not been gotten information from people who were subject to enhanced interrogation," Santorum said. "And so this idea that we didn't ask that question while Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was being waterboarded, he (McCain) doesn't understand how enhanced interrogation works.

"I mean, you break somebody, and after they're broken, they become cooperative. And that's when we got this information. And one thing led to another, and led to another, and that's how we ended up with bin Laden," said Santorum.

He added: "Maybe McCain has better information than I do, but from what I've seen, it seems pretty clear that but for these cooperative witnesses who were cooperative as a result of enhanced interrogations, we would not have gotten bin Laden."

McCain, the 2008 Republican president nominee, said his information came from Panetta. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the chairwoman of the Senate intelligence committee, backed up McCain's assessment that waterboarding of Mohammed did not produce the tip that led to bin Laden.

Brooke Buchanan, a spokeswoman for McCain, said Tuesday she would not dignify Santorum's comments with a response.

In the House, Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the chairman of the Intelligence committee, said the Justice Department should stop investigating CIA interrogators for alleged abuse of detainees under the Bush administration because their work was a "vital part of the chain" that led to the successful raid on bin Laden's hideout.

The Justice Department had no comment.

You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14

Offline Muck DeFuslims

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1070
Re: McCains Wrong Stance on Enhanced Interrogation Techniques
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2011, 04:12:51 AM »
McCain is a moron.

Let's assume he's right that enhanced interrogation didn't provide useful intelligence or information in this case.

Does that mean it will never provide useful intelligence ?

Of course not.

So what's the problem ?

Afraid of being accused of not adhering to the Geneva convention or being accused of torture ?

By whom ?  The Koranimals that chop the heads off of their prisoners ?

Anyone that gives a rat's [censored] about treating captured Koranimals well is out of his freaking mind.

If there's the slightest chance any useful information can be obtained through enhanced interrogation, then there shouldn't be the slightest hesitation or reluctance to employ it.

That's just common sense, unless you're not interested in tracking down terrorists and saving American lives.