Save Western Civilization > Save America
WOW. Talented 10-year-old kid.
yephora:
For your listening and viewing pleasure, try this:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?H23312FDD
And if that doesn’t work these should:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=NS0GvUCS4bA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=zS5LRRsNYZk
http://youtube.com/watch?v=S5dN_Vk_5Pg
Open any one of them you’ll have many more listed to the right of the YouTube screen. Enjoy :)
Scriabin:
Wonderful. Thank you. ;D
MassuhDGoodName:
Horowitz was a great concert pianist, and performed extremely well the music composed by other musicians (most of them not Jewish).
If talent alone (and not ethnicity or nationality) is our sole criterion for judgement, then Chopin, Beethoven, Mozart, and Liszt, all were superior to the great concert performers renowned for playing their works.
All four of the non-Jewish musicians listed not only composed huge catalogs of piano pieces, but performed them equally as well if not better than Horowitz, Rubinstein, and the many other non-Jewish concert pianists which followed them.
One of the classic arguments put forth by the Jew-haters of the traditional "anti-Semitism" such as Henry Ford, was that Jewish artists were capable of only imitating very well the completely original inventions of the non-Jewish artists; arguing that because the Jews were a "rootless" people, and not in indigenous "volk" of "blood and soil", they could not invent any original art because they lacked any sense of nationalistic "belonging" which alone inspired the works of the great German, Austrian, and Italian Classical and Romantic Period musicianship.
The neo-Nazis claim that the same is true of the renowned Jewish composers such as Leonard Bernstein, Aaron Copland, et al.
Is there any truth to this argument; that there will never be a "truly Jewish" art form of any originality unless it originates from a Jewish People rooted firmly in their Jewish Homeland?
Scriabin:
--- Quote from: MassuhDGoodName on September 29, 2006, 02:02:42 PM ---Horowitz was a great concert pianist, and performed extremely well the music composed by other musicians (most of them not Jewish).
If talent alone (and not ethnicity or nationality) is our sole criterion for judgement, then Chopin, Beethoven, Mozart, and Liszt, all were superior to the great concert performers renowned for playing their works.
All four of the non-Jewish musicians listed not only composed huge catalogs of piano pieces, but performed them equally as well if not better than Horowitz, Rubinstein, and the many other non-Jewish concert pianists which followed them.
One of the classic arguments put forth by the Jew-haters of the traditional "anti-Semitism" such as Henry Ford, was that Jewish artists were capable of only imitating very well the completely original inventions of the non-Jewish artists; arguing that because the Jews were a "rootless" people, and not in indigenous "volk" of "blood and soil", they could not invent any original art because they lacked any sense of nationalistic "belonging" which alone inspired the works of the great German, Austrian, and Italian Classical and Romantic Period musicianship.
The neo-Nazis claim that the same is true of the renowned Jewish composers such as Leonard Bernstein, Aaron Copland, et al.
Is there any truth to this argument; that there will never be a "truly Jewish" art form of any originality unless it originates from a Jewish People rooted firmly in their Jewish Homeland?
--- End quote ---
It is true that much of the great 'Western music' has nationalistic influence. There were of course great Jewish composers; Mendelssohn, Mahler, Offenbach, Alkan, but none of them can really be considered nationalistic.
Your question is difficult to answer being as I am a gentile.
MassuhDGoodName:
I, MassuhDGoodName, hereby go on record with the following:
I strongly believe that the ONLY truly "indigenous" musics from the U.S.A. (excluding those of the Native American Indian populations) are those which originated with the Negro races living in America.
The Negro invented the popular folk forms of "Gospel", "Blues", "Jazz", "Rock'n'Roll" (oh yes...Chuck Berry, Bo Diddley, Little Richard, Jimi Hendrix, et al...), etc..... .
It was the "European Tradition" of the European musical genius which arrived on American shores with the first white colonists.
It has grown, adapted, and affected many unique characteristics; yet it remains based solely in the European tradition.
Virtually all the symphonic and orchestral works by American born composers are based on the European Music which coalesced within the Roman Catholic Church, was patronized by the Royal Houses of Europe, and today is known as "Western Music"; studied in Acadame as "Music Theory", "Harmony", "Composition", etc.... .
The popular forms of music loved and praised in every country of the world, even in distant places such as Bhutan and Australia, are all "made in the U.S.A." and invented by Negroes. It's a fact.
All of the Negro Art forms, including music, art, dance, have been copied and adapted by white artists and composers.
I know that Chaim Ben Pesach disagrees with my views above.
No problem.
I just like to give credit where credit is due, that's all.
It's no great shame to admit that the Negroes are physically stronger, more artistically talented, more rhythmic, than are other races.
They also have a remarkable gift for comedy and experience very deep emotions.
I have often felt that the African nations could possibly profit materially if they did not attempt to do the same things as their European neighbors, but instead based their entire national incomes on the export of entertainment & tourist industries based around entertainment.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version