General Category > Ask JTF

Ask JTF for Sunday, August 14th, 2011.

<< < (5/5)

Confederate Kahanist:
Dear Chaim

Who is more likely to use drugs?  white males or black and Hispanic females?

If an illegal alien supporter was voting in the 1988 presidential election, would Ron Foul be the candidate that he or she would support?

Thanks G-d bless you, Israel and the Jewish people.

Maimonides:
Shalom Chaim and thank you as always for your hard work and for answering my questions.

Considering the current state of Israeli society, do really believe that Israeli Jews want redemption? It seems just like the Hebrews at Mount Sinai the majority of Israeli Jews don't want redemption, but want instant gratification. Looking at the welfare protests across Israel is appears that while people around the world are unemployed and starving the majority of Israelis are pampered and spoiled. I know that the Jews of Yesha are not like this, but they are a minority in Israel. Is it fair to say that the majority of Israeli Jews are not going to wake up in time to the danger that surrounds them unless they get a good kick in the you know what?

RationalThought110:
Shalom Chaim,

   When you get the chance, could you browse through the thread comparing Rick Perry to George Bush Jr? 

     Bush was also a governor of Texas.  In fact, Perry was Bush's Lt.Gov.  So he probably agreed with Bush on most issues.  When Bush was president, I don't think Perry ever criticized him. 

     If Perry is so "conservative" as his supporters claim, then why did he endorse Giuliani in 08?  I think this is a fact that people forget and they need to be reminded of.  Should the people on this forum who make videos, make one declaring Perry as a fraud?
 

          Perry pander to illegals.  When the AZ gov signed a law to ban sanctuary cities, Perry refused to defend and support the law.  Perry has pandered at times to Islamic groups and would probably support a Mosque at Ground Zero.
     
      Lots of the praise that Perry's supporters are saying about him sound like the stuff that Bush's supporters said about him in 1999 leading up to the primaries of the 2000 election. 

       Bush also talked about prayer and being religious so many conservatives thought they had nominated someone who was different than the typical establishment GOP nominees.


       So wouldn't those who support Romney or Perry basically be supporting someone who probably wouldn't be any better than Bush was?  Just because conservative voters want Obama voted out, that doesn't mean they should settle for a nominee who may not be any better than Bush? 

 
       Of the current candidates, I think Bachmann is the best candidate.  That's probably one of the main reasons why she gets attacked the most by the left-wing media as well as RINOs (Chris Wallace calling her a 'flake' in the media).

        I think Santorum deserves some credit for going after Ron Paul in the recent debate about Iran.  Though Bachmann is probably the better option.  Why did you say in the past that you disliked Santorum?  It was posted on the forum in the past that you supported Bob Casey Jr. over him when Santorum ran for re-election or the US Senate. 


   
       Although she has a position in Washington, she's really a Washington outsider.  She probably won't receive any endorsements from any well known politicians. She challenges the GOP establishment and GOP leadership in congress on issues.   In contrast, neither Romney nor Perry have ever done much of that.  So although the two of them have never served in Washington, what people probably don't understand is that they're more of the Washington insiders.






         Also, Huckabee interviewed Netanyahu a couple weeks ago and he went easy on him.  He never asked him any questions about why he's scared of Obama.  Huckabee seems to be too nice of an interviewer.

        Anti-Israel politicians think they have a right to boss Israel.  In contrast, Huckabee is someone who respects Israel so he wouldn't want to tell an Israeli politician what to do.  So Huckabee seems too nice and respectful to ever say to Netanyahu that he should stop freezing settlements.  In fact, people need to stop allowing the left to control the use of terminology.  The term "settlement" gives some people the impression that the territory isn't part of Israel  So when referencing those territories, shouldn't they just be referred to as Israel territory rather than settlements?

          In addition to deceiving conservatives in Israel when he runs for election, do you know why Netanyahu goes out of his way to deceive conservative-type people in the US, regardless of whether they're Jewish?   For example, before he became PM again, he had done interviews with Hannity and Glen Beck and he made statements to them that would give people the impression that he's a conservative. 


Livni has done interviews in the past stating that she wants Israel to do whatever Obama wants.  So although Netanyahu has been a disappointment, I don't think Livni would be any better of an option.  If Israel were to have new elections, someone considered more left-wing than Netanyahu would get elected.  I think it's been stated in the past that Olmert offered to give up more territory than any other PM has offered.   

    In the US, people such as Hannity have only heard names such as Netanahu, Olmert, Livni and Barak.  And when Netanyahu does interviews, he sounds much better than them.  So then people like Hannity and Beck then conclude that Netanyahu is a great option or the best possible option for Israel. 

         Although many of the people who post on the forum don't like Netanyahu, they need to remember that when people such as Hannity, Heck and others have praised Netanyahu, they think that they're showing support for Israel.  Similarly, when radicals like Code Pink bash Netanyahu, their intent is to display hatred toward Israel. 

JTFenthusiast2:
Dear Chaim,

I hope you have been well and that you and yours are in good health. I was wondering if you had any commentary on parents who cannot manage their children at all and wind up trying to get extra money from the government in the form of SSI. I have seen this first hand.  Some people should simply not be parents.  Why do the children, and now the taxpayer, have to suffer because some parents are inconsistent and demonstrate bad parenting skills in relation to their children.  I am not talking about children who are really sick and whose parents need help paying for life saving treatments.  I am say talking about poorly regulated children whose behavioral symptoms, say, of ADHD are controlled with medications.  Why should these parents get extra compensation for their children when in fact, the American tax payer is paying already for their medications and mental health treatment?  While I don't blame parents for having a child with a behavioral problem in isolation, I do think that poor parenting skills and resistance on the part of the parents to change their parenting style, should not be rewarded by giving cash payments to parents in the form of SSI.  What's the point of that?

muman613:
Shalom Chaim,

It seems to me that JTF has recently been infiltrated by 9/11 truthers and Ron Paulbots....

Could you please explain your position on both of these phenomenon, 9/11 truthers who seek to blame everyone other than those who perpetrated the attack on Americas soul and the Republican presidential 'candidate' Ron Paul...

Once again I cannot thank you enough for spending time answering our questions.

Thank you,
Michael

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page