Torah and Jewish Idea > Torah and Jewish Idea
Tolerance of Bar Kamtza Caused the Destruction of the 2nd Temple
edu:
In the tractate Gittin pages 55 and 56 we learn that the Caesar of Rome sent an animal to be sacrificed at the Temple and the wicked man Bar Kamtza physically damaged the animal. It was a type of blemish that invalidates the animal for the sacrificial service by Torah standards, however, according to the standards of the Gentiles, it does not.
The sages of the Sanhedrin thought to eliminate Bar Kamtza who threatened to inform to the Emperor that the Jews were planning a revolt against Rome. The proof being that the Jews didn't agree to sacrifice the Emperor's animal.
At the end they did not kill Bar Kamtza because an elder of the Sanhedrin, Rabbi Zechariah son of Avkulos claimed that one should be pious above the law and not kill Bar Kamtza [who was a Rodef] because perhaps people will wrongfully deduce that Bar Kamtza was killed because he put a blemish on an animal that was consecrated for a sacrifice and not because he was a Rodef.
Concerning the piety of Rabbi Zechariah the Talmud states: "Rabbi Yochanan said 'Onvutanuto' of Rabbi Zechariah son of Avkulos destroyed our Temple burnt the Heichal Building [where the Holy of Holies was located] and exiled us from our land".
Rashi explained there, 'Onvutanuto' - His tolerance that he tolerated this and did not kill him".
And the Meiri commentary there explained: - "And you learn from this that all who have a presumption of striking the community by means of the monarchy, it is permitted to kill him and as they said, "they thought to kill him so he wouldn't go and inform on them to the monarchy. Rabbi Zechariah said to them", etc. Now they said about him, the tolerance that he tolerated this and did not kill him destroyed our Temple".
muman613:
Yes, the story of Kamza and Bar Kamza is a very sad lesson.
I was thinking about this this afternoon... What are we supposed to learn from this?
Because Kamza was supposed to be invited to the party, and by mistake Bar Kamza was invited, and the host of the party disrespected Bar Kamza, this resulted in Bar Kamza causing trouble between the Jewish people and the Romans. So from this we learn a lesson about why the Temple was destroyed.
I have heard that it was not an option to kill Bar Kamza. It was not known that he would do what he did, and at what point do you suggest he deserved being killed? After the party when he was disrespected in front of the Rabbis? Also, was it known that he was the one who caused the blemish on the animal?
Also the primary lesson was that from the baseless hatred which the host felt for Bar Kamza the result was the destruction. Why did the host hate Bar Kamza in the first place?
Chabad has a video on this topic concerning Gittin 55b-57a :
http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/949898/jewish/The-Destruction-of-the-Holy-Temple.htm
Another issue was the controversy whether an animal with a blemish was acceptable in order to maintain peace and those Rabbis who insisted that the principle was more important than the peace...
The problem was that some Rabbis suggested that if they killed Bar Kamza it would set a precedent so that people would think that the halacha for those who blemish an animal would be death, which they did not believe was the Halacha.
But it is true it was improper 'tolerance' which ultimately led to the destruction... But we all know that it was a decree from Hashem as the prophets had told us..
muman613:
Here is the translation from Halakhah.com:
http://halakhah.com/gittin/gittin_56.html
--- Quote ---He said, I won't. Then let me give you half the cost of the party. No, said the other. Then let me pay for the whole party. He still said, No, and he took him by the hand and put him out. Said the other, Since the Rabbis were sitting there and did not stop him, this shows that they agreed with him. I will go and inform against then, to the Government. He went and said to the Emperor, The Jews are rebelling against you. He said, How can I tell? He said to him: Send them an offering and see whether they will offer it [on the altar]. So he sent with him a fine calf.1 While on the way he made a blemish on its upper lip, or as some say on the white of its eye, in a place where we [Jews] count it a blemish but they do not. The Rabbis were inclined to offer it in order not to offend the Government. Said R. Zechariah b. Abkulas to them: People will say that blemished animals are offered on the altar. They then proposed to kill Bar Kamza so that he should not go and inform against them, but R. Zechariah b. Abkulas said to them, Is one who makes a blemish on consecrated animals to be put to death? R. Johanan thereupon remarked: Through the scrupulousness2 of R. Zechariah b. Abkulas our House has been destroyed, our Temple burnt and we ourselves exiled from our land.3
--- End quote ---
muman613:
The real question in this entire story of the Talmud has to do with the question of the zealots.... It seems to frown on zealotry because it resulted in even more suffering...
--- Quote ---The biryoni11 were then in the city. The Rabbis said to them: Let us go out and make peace with them [the Romans]. They would not let them, but on the contrary said, Let us go out and fight them. The Rabbis said: You will not succeed. They then rose up and burnt the stores of wheat and barley so that a famine ensued. Martha the daughter of Boethius was one of the richest women in Jerusalem. She sent her man-servant out saying, Go and bring me some fine flour. By the time he went it was sold out. He came and told her, There is no fine flour, but there is white [flour]. She then said to him, Go and bring me some. By the time he went he found the white flour sold out. He came and told her, There is no white flour but there is dark flour. She said to him, Go and bring me some. By the time he went it was sold out. He returned and said to her, There is no dark flour, but there is barley flour. She said, Go and bring me some. By the time he went this was also sold out. She had taken off her shoes, but she said, I will go out and see if I can find anything to eat. Some dung stuck to her foot and she died.12 Rabban Johanan b. Zakkai applied to her the verse, The tender and delicate woman among you which would not adventure to set the sole of her foot upon the ground.13 Some report that she ate a fig left by R. Zadok, and became sick and died. For R. Zadok observed fasts for forty years in order that Jerusalem might not be destroyed, [and he became so thin that] when he ate anything the food could be seen [as it passed through his throat.] When he wanted to restore himself, they used to bring him a fig, and he used to suck the juice and throw the rest away. When Martha was about to die, she brought out all her gold and silver and threw it in the street, saying, What is the good of this to me, thus giving effect to the verse, They shall cast their silver in the streets.14
11 Perhaps = palace guards (from biryah). The reference is obviously to the Zealot bands who defended Jerusalem.
--- End quote ---
muman613:
What does this final sentence mean?
http://halakhah.com/gittin/gittin_57.html
--- Quote ---What is your punishment [in the other world]? He replied: What I decreed for myself. Every day my ashes are collected and sentence is passed on me and I am burnt and my ashes are scattered over the seven seas. He then went and raised Balaam by incantations. He asked him: Who is in repute in the other world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said, about joining them? He replied: Thou shalt not seek their peace nor their prosperity all thy days for ever.1 He then asked: What is your punishment? He replied: With boiling hot semen.2 He then went and raised by incantations the sinners of Israel.3 He asked them: Who is in repute in the other world? They replied: Israel. What about joining them? They replied: Seek their welfare, seek not their harm. Whoever touches them touches the apple of his eye. He said: What is your punishment? They replied: With boiling hot excrement, since a Master has said: Whoever mocks at the words of the Sages is punished with boiling hot excrement. Observe the difference between the sinners of Israel and the prophets of the other nations who worship idols. It has been taught: Note from this incident how serious a thing it is to put a man to shame, for G-d espoused the cause of Bar Kamza and destroyed His House and burnt His Temple.
--- End quote ---
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version