There was a story in the news last week where it came out that Gilad Shalits father claims that Gilad was 'mistreated' by his captors during his extensive time in captivity. It was obvious to everyone who observed Gilad as he was free that the man looked emaciated, withdrawn, and disoriented. While the media ran that story last week, this week they are running the dirty terrorists 'side of the story'.
So the terrorist bastard who kept Gilad hostage, without visits from his family nor even from the Red Cross, claim that they treated Gilad very well, allowing him to 'watch tv'... The obvious insensitivity of the media is outrageous. Of course the media doesn't call them what they are, bloodthirsty Jew-hating terrorists, but they refer to them as the 'militant group hamas'...
Moral relativism is sick, it makes me want to vomit, and yet the media is acting more and more without any journalistic integrity or any responsible journalism.
http://articles.boston.com/2011-10-22/news/30310930_1_gilad-schalit-israeli-soldier-popular-resistance-committeesGaza abductor says Israeli soldier treated well
October 22, 2011|Associated PressA leader of the Palestinian militant group that captured the Israeli soldier swapped this week for more than 1,000 Palestinian prisoners said Saturday that the soldier was treated well during his captivity.
Zuhair Al-Qaisi of the Popular Resistance Committees told The Associated Press that Gilad Schalit was given sufficient food and allowed to watch Hebrew-language TV.
Schalit was notably gaunt, pale and exhausted when he was freed. His father says his son is suffering from malnutrition, the effects of isolation and lack of exposure to sun and also wounds sustained during his capture that had not been treated properly. Noam Schalit also said his son “endured harsh things’’ in his more than five years of captivity in Gaza.
Topic: This is what is wrong with an 'impartial & biased' media... (Read 607 times)