ALL UK LEGISLATION SINCE YEAR 2000 is Null and Void

[BritishSword]

 ALL UK LEGISLATION PASSED SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID
IMPLICATIONS OF MISMANAGEMENT OF 'REFORM' OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS
Saturday 10 April 2010 01:01
• We REPOSTED this report on 21st April for some hours. As a consequence, the links to the report DOUBLED OVERNIGHT, to 7,040. Our monitoring of the links to this report has revealed massive ongoing interference. The highly revealing data on this score have now been repositioned at the foot of this report. You'll see that the report basically 'went viral', and that Google has had great difficulty controlling it. The doubling of the links overnight speaks for itself.

• Please also note that THIS IS THE ORIGINAL REPORT ON THIS SUBJECT.


UPDATE: BRITAIN FACES A COLOSSAL CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS
Now that the deception over the Hereditary Peers’ Letters Patent has been placed decisively in the public domain [see below] THE CRISIS CAN NO LONGER BE GLOSSED OVER AND IGNORED.

• That’s what they will try to do, but they can’t.

Here are the issues that the UK Political and Bureaucratic Establishment face which PRECLUDE the usual cynical official procedure of pretending there’s no problem here:

• The nation will have to be told that TEN YEARS’ WORTH OF LAWS don’t exist in reality, only on paper, and that all legislation since 2000 is NULL AND VOID.

• The European Union Collective will have to be informed that none of the legislation that it has inflicted on the Westminster Parliament since 2000 is valid, the whole lot being NULL AND VOID*.

• The Privy Council, the Lord President of the Council (Lord Mandelson!), the Lord Privy Seal (Harriet Harman QC, MP!), an office combined with the office of Leader of the House of Commons, and whoever else advises The Queen as Head of State, will HAVE to grasp this nettle and inform Her Majesty that all the Bills she has signed since 2000 are NULL AND VOID.

• All foreign and Commonwealth Governments will have to receive a Diplomatic Note from Her Majesty’s Government to the same effect. THIS CANNOT BE DELAYED, or there will be serious consequences arising from thorny UK legislative issues affecting governments abroad.

• The Hereditary Peers will have to petition The Queen EN MASSE for Her Majesty to intervene to enable the Hereditary Peers’ reinstatement to the House of Lords and the return of their Letters Patent. If the Government have taken custody of the Letters Patent of Hereditary Peers whose Letters Patent were granted centuries ago, that is another scandal.

• NO FURTHER LEGISLATION CAN BE PASSED BY PARLIAMENT until this mess has been sorted. Not now that the whole world knows about this unconstitutional, unlawful and illegal state of affairs.

• If the usual British official modus operandi of IGNORING THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM and pretending that the problem doesn’t exist is adopted, there will be very serious accumulating, ongoing consequences for ALL ELEMENTS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL SETTLEMENT, and the situation could run completely out of control before the Establishment has had breakfast.

* When informing Brussels that the past ten years’ worth of Westminster legislation is VOID, the opportunity should be taken to add that remittance of taxpayers’ funds into the hands of a criminal enterprise is illegal (as we have proved), according to the UK Serious Fraud Office.

The European Commission’s accounts have not been approved by the EU’s own Court of Auditors in Luxembourg for the past FOURTEEN YEARS, which reveals that the European Commission is operating UNLAWFULLY AND ILLEGALLY, and thus that the British Government is committing an ongoing CRIMINAL OFFENCE by remitting the proceeds of its VAT collections to Brussels. UK VAT taxpayers may have a case against the Government for illegally diverting their VAT tax remittances.

It ALSO means that the Member Governments can sue the European Commission for the RETURN OF THEIR UNLAWFULLY REMITTED VALUE ADDED TAX PAYMENTS plus compound interest going back for fourteen years, as the European Commission is criminally retaining their taxpayers' funds remitted by the Member Governments in error.

• As we recommended last autumn, and previously, British VAT accruals should be placed into a special Treasury account, to be offset against the colossal Government deficit and to pay down the permissive debt incurred by the discredited Labour Government.

• It is ANOTHER SCANDAL OF IMMENSE PROPORTIONS that the British Government sees fit to commit the crime of remitting its taxpayers’ funds into the hands of a criminal enterprise when the country is all but bankrupt thanks to the Government’s stupidity and profligacy, when the accruals in question CAN LEGITIMATELY BE DIVERTED INTO OFFSETTING THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE GOVERNMENT’S SPENDTHRIFT BEHAVIOUR.

• That would CUT SHORT THE DISHONEST ELECTION CAMPAIGN NON-DEBATE about how the deficit and the colossal volume of unnecessary new official debt are going to be addressed.

All in all, therefore, we have the ingredients of an IMMENSE CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS right across the political-financial spectrum. IGNORING THIS WILL HAVE FATAL CONSEQUENCES.

[BritishSword]

• SUBVERSIVE PLAN TO IMPOSE FIXED-TERM PARLIAMENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

• 'CONSERVATIVE' LEADER DAVID CAMERON BACKS THIS WHEEZE, TOO

• MONARCH’S KEY RESIDUAL POWER IS TO CALL FOR
A SUITABLE CANDIDATE TO FORM A GOVERNMENT

• ALL LEGISLATION PASSED BY THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID

• HEREDITARY PEERS NOT REMOVABLE BY GENERAL LEGISLATION

• AUTHORITY FOR THIS STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT ITSELF

• ANALYSIS OF BARONESS ASHTON’S LORDS STATEMENT

• 900 HEREDITARY PEER-SPECIFIC BILLS WOULD BE NEEDED

• BOTCHED OBFUSCATION OF BLAIR’S HAM-FISTED MISCALCULATION

• THE UNLAWFUL REMOVAL OF PEERS’ PASSES TO THE LORDS

• RECAPITULATION OF THE ANALYSIS TO THIS POINT

• HOUSE OF LORDS WAS THEN PACKED WITH BLAIR’S CRONIES

• DEFINITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS BOTCHED REVOLUTIONARY OPERATION

• HOW THIS CHAOTIC STATE OF AFFAIRS CAN BE RECTIFIED WITH MINIMAL HASSLE

• WHY THE REVOLUTIONARIES HAVE SHOT THEMSELVES IN THE FOOT

• POSTSCRIPT: NOTHING THE NEW PARLIAMENT PASSES WILL BE VALID, EITHER

• ‘SCUM OF THE EARTH’, ‘TOO CLEVER BY HALF’

• WITHOUT ABOLITION OF THE 1999 ACT, THE GENERAL ELECTION IS POINTLESS


• Reiminder: The report dated 11th April 2010 entitled 'POLAND’S SUSPICIOUS SECOND KATYN MASSACRE TRAGEDY' can be accessed at once by pressing 'Archive' or the Archive button.


'Seeing what's at the end of one's nose requires constant effort'. George Orwell.

SECURITIZATION IS ILLEGAL UPDATE: In the Subs/Books Update panel immediately below the NEWS panel that you are currently viewing, you will see an announcement concerning publication of Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 7 & 8. If you press that announcement text and open up the panel, you will see the contents list for the new [2010Q1] issue of E.I.R., including a breakdown of the Chapter Headings for the detailed analysis showing that Securitization is illegal. See our NEWS report dated 10th March 2010 for summaries of some of the data from this analysis. We understand that the report has created uproar in certain corridors of corrupt power.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE 'CONTACT US' FACILITY.


NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

SUBVERSIVE PLAN TO IMPOSE FIXED-TERM PARLIAMENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
Having successfully degraded Britain’s public finances and its currency, first by years of inordinate socialist public spending and then by burdening all future generations with unconscionable public debt obligations because he didn’t like the sight of Argentine-style queues of customers lining the streets to withdraw their savings from the corrupt Northern Rock bank, the international socialist British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is secretly continuing the subversive operation launched by his corrupt predecessor, Tony Blair, to destroy the Monarchy and to convert Britain into a Republic.

Mounting evidence that the revolutionary UK Labour Government seeks the destruction of the Monarchy was confirmed on 8th April, when Brown stated, at the outset of the General Election campaign, that he will introduce fixed-term Parliaments and a referendum on the reform of the British first-past-the-post voting system if Labour is re-elected on 6th May.

In announcing an intention to impose fixed-term Parliaments, Brown is clearly accommodating the Campaign for Fixed-Term Parliaments – an innocuous-sounding but in fact thoroughly subversive, revolutionary so-called ‘cross-party’ initiative that has been campaigning behind the scenes to persuade gormless politicians whose brains reside mainly in their boots that the Prime Minister’s power to call for an election at the time of his choosing is by some alchemy an anti-democratic constitutional anachronism, and should be replaced by a fixed term of four or five years.

• Any such 'reform' would be consistent with, and would pressupose, the conversion of Britain into a chaotic Republic like the worst extant contemporary example, the United States: see why, below.

• Another clue here is that nobility (and 'fake' nobility, such as is represented by Blair's cronies in the House of Lords) is incompatible with any Republican form of Government. [The original 13th Amendment to the US Constitution, drafted around 1800, banned Titles, Nobles and Esquires, and barred such title-holders from being US citizens and therefore from holding high office, a state of affairs that triggered the War of 1812 with Britain, leading to the sacking of Washington in 1814; whereupon the 13th Amendment was quietly dropped, with the assumption being that it was not ratified. However in recent years, state-by-state archival research has proved that it WAS ratified].

'CONSERVATIVE' LEADER DAVID CAMERON BACKS THIS WHEEZE, TOO
On 26th May 2009, the 'Conservative' David Cameron – front man for the alternative intelligence-promoted (Notting Hill) clique that has been readied, US-style, to replace the intelligence-promoted (Islington) claque headed by Blair and Brown from the 1990s if the forthcoming election cannot be adequately rigged to ensure a Brown victory – indicated that he is stupid enough to have fallen for this ruse, as well, when he pronounced that ‘a Conservative Government will seriously consider the option of fixed-term Parliaments when there is a majority Government’.

[BritishSword]

MONARCH’S KEY RESIDUAL POWER IS TO CALL FOR
A SUITABLE CANDIDATE TO FORM A GOVERNMENT
Why does this stance threaten the Monarchy? Answer: because one of the British Monarch’s residual OVERT powers consists in her power to consent to a Prime Minister’s request for a dissolution of Parliament, and her power also, on advice, to call for the elected parliamentary leader most likely to be in a position to form a Government, in the event of uncertainty – powers that may need to be deployed if the outcome of this General Election turns out to be as indecisive as many observers think is extremely likely.

And why can we state without fear of contradiction that the Campaign for Fixed-Term Parliaments is a subversive operation which has as its ultimate objective the overthrow of the Monarchy?

Because this tinkering with the UK Constitution needs to be seen in the context that it follows the Labour Government’s wholly unconstitutional, illegal and unlawful semi-destruction of the House of Lords – which can clearly be viewed as part of the same operation, as will now be demonstrated.

ALL LEGISLATION PASSED BY THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID
Investigations into this dimension of the secret revolutionary plan to destroy the Monarchy – which stands in the way of covertly antagonistic foreign powers’ hegemony strategies – and to convert Britain into a Republic, have yielded the remarkable finding that ALL LEGISLATION PASSED BY THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT SINCE ABOUT 2000 HAS BEEN NULL AND VOID.

• There are NO exceptions, contrary to assertions from some quarters that Finance Bills are not captured by this crisis. Rubbish! ALL Westminster legislation since 2000, INCLUDING all the rubber-stamping of legislation shovelled at us from Brussels, is NULL AND VOID, as explained below.

• PLUS: ALL LEGAL ACTIONS BASED ON LAWS PASSED AT WESTMINSTER SINCE 2000 FALL TO THE GROUND BECAUSE THOSE LAWS ARE BASED ON FRAUDULENT, RIGGED PROCEDURES.

Here’s how this definitive conclusion is reached: bear with us as we step through the evidence as deftly as possible, without omitting any of the necessary simple steps here:

HEREDITARY PEERS NOT REMOVABLE BY GENERAL LEGISLATION
Membership of the House of Lords is dependent upon the issuance, on ennoblement, by officials directly serving the Monarchy, of Letters Patent.

Removal of a Peer of the Realm from his seat in the House of Lords cannot be procured by General Legislation, such as the Blair Government’s House of Lords Act 1999.

This piece of General Legislation did NOT empower Her Majesty’s Government to impede a single Hereditary Peer who had taken his or her seat in the House of Lords after having sworn the Oath of Allegiance to the Crown, from continuing to carry out their solemn duties in the House of Lords as Councillors to the Crown, in accordance with the British Constitution.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT ITSELF
Please do not argue with this.

The authority for this statement comes from the Labour Government itself:

29 September 2008 : Column WA398:

House of Lords: Letters Patent
Lord Laird asked Her Majesty's Government:
By what means Letters Patent creating peerages can be changed;
and in what legislation that has occurred. [HL5196]:

The Lord President of the Council (Baroness Ashton of Upholland):

The effect of Letters Patent creating peerages can be changed by legislation which has that specific effect. It cannot be changed by legislation of general application.

Thus, the Peerage Act 1963 allowed Peeresses in their own right to sit in the House of Lords regardless of the terms of any Letters Patent creating the peerage. The House of Lords Act 1999 removed the right of anyone to sit in the House by virtue of a hereditary peerage unless they were specifically excepted from the provisions. Conversely, the House of Lords decided in 1922 in the case of Viscountess Rhondda that the terms of the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act 1919 were not sufficiently specific to allow her to take her seat in the Lords when her Letters Patent allowed her to inherit the peerage, but not the seat in the Lords. I am aware of only one case in which the effect of individual Letters Patent has been changed by Act of Parliament, which is that of the
Duke of Marlborough in 1706.

[BritishSword]

ANALYSIS OF BARONESS ASHTON’S LORDS STATEMENT
The first two sentences here are crucial:

‘The effect of Letters Patent creating peerages can be changed by legislation which has that specific effect. It cannot be changed by legislation of general application’.

Having taken their Oath of Allegiance to the Crown, some 900 Hereditary Peers (with the exception of a specified rump group of 92 hereditary peers) had the ‘effect’ of their Letters Patent ostensibly annulled by The House of Lords Act 1999, which was GENERAL LEGISLATION.

However, as Baroness Ashton told the House of Lords on 20th September 2008: ‘The effect… cannot be changed by legislation of general application’.

In standard double-minded fashion, Baroness Ashton then told the Lords that:

‘The House of Lords Act 1999 removed the right of anyone to sit in the House by virtue of a hereditary peerage unless they were specifically excepted from the provisions’.

900 HEREDITARY PEER-SPECIFIC BILLS WOULD BE NEEDED
But since The House of Lords Act 1999 was GENERAL LEGISLATION, the ‘right’ in question, part of the ‘effect’ specified at the beginning of Baroness Ashton’s pronouncement, removed that right illegally, unlawfully and unconstitutionally. Because:

• In order for ‘the effect of Letters Patent’ to be modified, given that it cannot be modified by General Legislation, it is necessary for:

• 900 PEER-SPECIFIC BILLS TO BE PASSED BY PARLIAMENT changing ‘the effect of Letters Patent’, as per Baroness Ashton’s opening sentences:

'The effect of Letters Patent creating peerages can be changed by legislation which has that specific effect. It cannot be changed by legislation of general application’.

BOTCHED OBFUSCATION OF BLAIR’S HAM-FISTED MISCALCULATION
At some stage early in this process after passage of the 1999 legislation, the Blair Government realised that it had messed up and had browbeaten The Queen to append her signature to an UNCONSTITUTIONAL, UNLAWFUL BILL, with all the hazards associated with such a miscalculation.

So, in order to OBFUSCATE the situation and to smother any ‘untoward consequences’ from the subversive Blair Government’s perspective, Ministers embarked upon two subsidiary underhand, surreptitious, unconstitutional operations:

• First, we are informed that the Labour Government somehow managed to persuade most of the hereditary peers to hand over their Letters Patent to some Government Department (from which extracting the documents will of course be impossible) – notwithstanding that the Letters Patent remain the property of each Hereditary Peer to this day.

• Secondly, immediately after The House of Lords Act 1999 had received the Royal Assent, those hereditary peers whose names were not included among the rump of hereditary peers who were still 'allowed' to continue carrying out their duties as Councillors to the Crown, had their passes removed from them, so that they were thereby prevented from gaining access to the Chamber.

• The main traitor in this scandal was the ‘Conservative’ Peer Lord Cranborne, then the leader of the Conservative Party in the House of Lords, who perpetrated this tawdry ‘deal’ with the corrupt Blair behind the backs of the leaders of the Conservative Party.

THE UNLAWFUL REMOVAL OF PEERS’ PASSES TO THE LORDS
The scandalous removal of the hereditary peers’ passes came to light in 2008 when an Hereditary Peer requested a pass so that he could present his Letters Patent, take his oath of Allegiance to the Crown and thereby take his seat in the House of Lords.

When he discovered that the House of Lords authorities would not issue a pass enabling him to gain access to the Chamber, Lord Mereworth wrote as follows to The Lord President of the Council, the responsible official concerned:


The Lord President of the Council
The House of Lords,
Westminster,
London SW1A 0PW
By First Class Special Delivery
22nd June 2009

Dear Lord President,
Please accept the following as a token of esteem. Set out below is the published written question asked by Lord Laird of Artivargan and the written response given by your predecessor Baroness Ashton of Upholland on behalf of Her Majesty’s Government on 29th September 2008.

[see above: Editor].

Given the answer, it is clear that the hereditary peers’ Letters Patent were not amended by the House of Lords Act 1999 owing to the fact that the said Act is a piece of legislation for general application. Your predecessor’s answer put beyond doubt that my peerage and connections with the House of Lords do meet the requirements for a pass to be issued to me forthwith.

I enclose a copy of my letter dated 24th April 2009 to Sir Michael Wilcox KCB, the then Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod, requesting him to renew my pass to the House before it expired at the end of April 2009 [not shown here: Editor].

I felt sorry for Sir Freddie Viggers, the current Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod, [who is] clearly a dignified man of honour, who would not have demeaned himself by signing the letter on 17th June in response to my letter of 24th April unless he had been ordered to do so.

The response was as follows:-

‘I have looked into the renewal of your House of Lords pass and I have discussed this with the Lord Speaker, the usual channels and the Clerk of the Parliaments. I must inform you that it will not be possible to agree your request. Your peerage and connections with this House do not meet the requirements for a pass to be issued, and I am not able to issue a waiver.

I enclose a copy of the said letter. In light of the above and bearing in mind that I have had to wait two months for a totally incorrect and an extremely embarrassing response, I hope you will upon receipt of this letter acknowledge it by return and confirm that you have instructed Sir Freddie Viggers, to issue me with a House of Lords pass within seven days of the date of this letter.

Yours faithfully, Lord Mereworth.

RECAPITULATION OF THE ANALYSIS TO THIS POINT:

(1): The hereditary peers’ Letters Patent were not amended by the House of Lords Act 1999 owing to the fact that the said Act is a piece of legislation for general application.

(2): The withdrawal of the hereditary peers’ passes to enable them to enter the Chamber and so to fulfill their duties as Councillors to the Monarch is therefore unconstitutional, illegal and unlawful.

(3): The consequent destabilisation and variation of the membership composition of the House of Lords is likewise unconstitutional, illegal and unlawful.

(4): The consequence that most hereditary peers are unable in practice to exercise their duties as Councillors to the Crown further represents an unconstitutional, illegal and unlawful deprivation of their rights (and also, let it be added, of their human rights) to serve the Monarch in accordance with their Oath of Allegiance and consequent duties to the Crown.

HOUSE OF LORDS WAS THEN PACKED WITH BLAIR’S CRONIES
Having thrown the constitutional furniture around the room in this barbaric and wanton fashion, the Blair-Brown Revolutionary Government then packed the Upper House with their own cronies, for whom Letters Patent were issued in spades. This behaviour encapsulated the following ironies:

• Having started this destructive revolutionary process, the revolutionary socialists led by the corrupt opportunist criminal Blair and the hardened international socialist Brown then lost their bottle and decided that THEY quite fancied joining the élite themselves one day – making it possible for themselves and their cronies to become Lords and Ladies of the Realm.

In other words, their egos got the better of their sterile ideological preoccupations.

• Having thus abused the Letters Patent system in the manner described above, they accordingly proceeded to abuse it further by issuing new Letters Patent to a bunch of preferred and randomly selected hacks, thereby, contrary to law, discriminating against the Hereditary Peers who retained every right to sit in the Chamber and perform their serious duties as Councillors to The Queen.

[see above].

[BritishSword]

DEFINITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS BOTCHED REVOLUTIONARY OPERATION
So, what are the consequences of this incredible state of affairs?

Why, as stated above, it means that:

• Every piece of legislation passed by the British Parliament since 2000 IS 100% NULL AND VOID because it was passed though an improperly constituted House of Lords which therefore lacked the power to approve any legislation for sending down to the House of Commons at all.

• Included within the UK legislation which is therefore null and void is the legislation approving the Lisbon Treaty – to which, therefore, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is NOT BOUND and can fully disregard and disavow, for this reason alone.

• Also included within the bogus legislation is the toxic public debt arising from the reckless bail-out 'Statutes' enacted in order to rescue Gordon Brown from being sunk without trace due to the media images of long street lines of Northern Rock customers pulling their savings. These 'laws', which bind/enslave future generations ad infinitum ARE VACATED, given this state of affairs.

HOW THIS CHAOTIC STATE OF AFFAIRS CAN BE RECTIFIED WITH MINIMAL HASSLE
If the incoming British Government wants to ensure that its future legislation is legitimate, and that it has any purpose at all, it has two alternatives to rectify this chaotic state of affairs:

•EITHER it must table about 900 separate Bills specific to each Hereditary Peer of the Realm and must have these Bills passed by Parliament individually, so that, in the words of Baroness Ashton of Upholland: 'The effect of Letters Patent creating peerages can he changed by legislation which has that specific effect'. This would have to be done AT ONCE, before passing any other laws.

• OR: On taking power, it must immediately introduce legislation to ABOLISH The House of Lords Act 1999, thereby 'restoring' the said unlawfully, unconstitutionally and illegally removed rights and duties of the Hereditary Peers to enable them to perform their duties as Councillors to the Crown as per their Oaths of Allegiance to the British Monarch. (This would NOT render legitimate all the laws published since 2000, which will remain unconstitutional, unlawful and illegal indefinitely).

• If the second, sensible clean-up option is chosen, the Bill to ABOLISH The House of Lords Act 1999 MUST be the FIRST piece of legislation to be introduced: because any legislation introduced into Parliament absent such a Bill to ABOLISH the 1999 Act will be a complete waste of time and resources, as it cannot be lawful under these circumstances. (This would NOT render legitimate all the laws published since 2000, which will remain unconstitutional, unlawful and illegal indefinitely).

• If The Queen's Speech MAKES NO MENTION OF A BILL TO ABOLISH THE 1999 ACT, you can take it that the next Government intends to operate unconstitutionally, unlawfully and illegally.

• That will mean that, as is the case with ALL LEGISLATION PASSED AT WESTMINSTER SINCE 2000, the legislative activity of the new British Government will be NULL AND VOID, too.

WHY THE REVOLUTIONARIES HAVE SHOT THEMSELVES IN THE FOOT
Two related points in conclusion:

• Charles I was beheaded when he refused to go along with the Will of Parliament – a fact of history of which every subsequent British Monarch has of course been ‘cognisant’.

• On this occasion, Parliament hasn’t disposed of the Monarch in the aforementioned manner; as a direct consequence of which:

• THE SECRET REVOLUTIONARY INTENTIONS OF THE SUBVERSIVE LABOUR GOVERNMENT HAVE BEEN SELF-FRUSTRATED, GIVEN THAT ALL THEIR LEGISLATION SINCE 2000 IS VOID.

‘SCUM OF THE EARTH’, ‘TOO CLEVER BY HALF’
Shortly after the Blair Government was elected in 1997, an extremely sober and respected British analyst remarked to the Editor that the Labour Government that had just come to power consisted of ‘the scum of the earth’. This gentleman is probably the most upright and sober observer known to the Editor – a person of the highest integrity not inclined to fruity language in any way, shape or form. So when he said this, the Editor took careful note. And it turns out that he was ‘right-on’.

But a characteristic of these self-important parasitical revolutionary scum of the earth is that, since their intentions and behaviour are rooted in lies and confusion, they invariably ‘mess up’. They are always 'too clever by half’, so that they always wind up with a dog's dinner.

And in respect of what we have reported above, it can be said that they have messed up quite spectacularly, because ALL their convoluted Talmudic legislation – including of course ALL THE TAX LEGISLATION, ALL THEIR BUDGETS – SINCE 2000, ARE DEFINITIVELY NULL AND VOID.

• Well done, Blair and Brown, you prize revolutionary buffoons.

The British people will always be grateful that your sterile arrogance blinded you to what you were doing, and to what you thought you’d got away with.

[BritishSword]

WITHOUT ABOLITION OF THE 1999 ACT, THE GENERAL ELECTION IS POINTLESS
Corollaries to this chaotic state of affairs, which the corrupt elements of the Establishment and the bureaucracy thought you'd never hear about, include the following:

• Absent one of the alternatives outlined above (900 individual Bills or outright ABOLITION of the 1999 Act), the incoming Parliament will KNOWINGLY, FOLLOWING THIS POSTING, BE ENGAGED IN FRAUDULENT LEGISLATIVE ACTION, deceiving itself, the nation and foreign powers alike.

• THEREFORE, by extension, THE PRESENT ELECTION WOULD BE A WASTE OF TIME AND A FARCE, entailing the election of a Westminster Parliament WITH NO POWERS TO LEGISLATE.


• INTERFERENCE WITH THIS REPORT:

COVERAGE OF THIS REPORT IS STILL BEING ROUTINELY INTERFERED WITH…
The Google count for this report has been varying UP AND DOWN, which means that they were terrified it would go viral. So the NSA was trying to manipulate the situation by depressing the count. This is the routine: Any heavy content that contains very serious issues and threatens to go viral raises a flag on Google’s site counting mechanism. They look at it, then ask NSA about it, NSA says: SPIKE IT. The link count is then depressed. Or a reset/restore mechanism to previous time or config or settings automatically resets the counter(s) back. Here’s a summary of how the link numbers for this report varied over a very short timeframe, CONFIRMING INTERFERENCE, which proves THEY ARE DEAD WORRIED ABOUT THIS REPORT. They think it’s a threat, whereas it’s a straightforward piece of perfectly justified and accurate investigative journalism. Times shown below are UK times. Look at what happened on 13th April and subsequently....

13 April 2010:
14.00 hrs: 749 links
20.00 hrs: 588 links
20.49 hrs: 684 links
21.47 hrs: 524 links
24.00 hrs: 510 links

14 April 2010
12.27 hrs: 655 links
18.16 hrs: 606 links
23.51 hrs: 645 links

15 April 2010
16.17 hrs: 1,710 links
16.18 hrs: 1,710 links
16.38 hrs: 766 links
17.00 hrs: 1,710 links
17.15 hrs: 842 links
17.52 hrs: 1,630 links
19.13 hrs: 1,310 links
19.30 hrs: 2,180 links
19.40 hrs: 1,310 links

16 April 2010
17.50 hrs: 1,950 links
18.10 hrs: 1,090 links
18.24 hrs: 1,090 links

17 April 2010
23.35 hrs: 2,370 links

19 April 2010
10:30 hrs: 3,190 links
12:15 hrs: 3,750 links
17:45 hrs: 3,190 links

20 April 2010
10:30 hrs: 4,750 links
10:40 hrs: 5,090 links
10:50 hrs: 5,060 links
12:50 hrs: 5,100 links
19:25 3,470 links

21 April 2010
01:15 hrs: 4,780 links

22 April 2010:
13:00 hrs: 7,040 links

• Note re this data: Either the Google counter system is completely out of control, or there is massive ongoing censorship interference with this report. Obviously the latter must apply. Note that an advertisment labelled: direct.gov.uk: Directgov: UK Laws: Government Help & Information, has appeared immediately adjacent to the main Google displays of our report. How odd!

• The point is, they can't expunge Baroness Ashton of Upholland's statement in the House of Lords from Hansard. So they are desperate to squash this report before it grows legs. It now has more legs than a centipede, so all they can do is keep suppressing the links. Doesn't work!

• At 7.22 a.m. on 16th April, the Editor received an email from Melbourne, Australia, stating as follows: 'Just a short message to let you know that some emails sent out that contained the link to your Report about void UK legislation since 2000, have been interfered with'.

• Notes: Applying quotation marks refines the search to the precise report. The fact that attempts were made to 'flatten' the links on this basis PROVES that the report was being suppressed. So, they have been caught cutting down the number of links from 749 to 510, and yet it's still climbing. This proves that Google censors news reports. It does so at the specific behest of the NSA. In this case NSA may have been asked to assist by the UK's GCHQ.

Without quotation marks you get coverage of the words used, but not necessarily (after the initial findings) in the same order. You wind up with innumerable unconnected items. But even on THAT odd basis, serious fiddling was going on. Specifically, at 01.10 a.m. on 14th April, 99,400 links were shown on that basis. An hour or so later, that aggregate had been squashed to 12,200 links. And by 15.35 p.m. on 14th April, this number had been reduced to 9,680, indicating that Google had in fact removed nearly 100,000 sites using the headline words, but in any order, in a sweep operation to censor this report. So much for the Internet being free of censorship. By 18.16 p.m., the count had risen back to 102,000, accessing the universe of articles using the same words in any order.


• POSTSCRIPT:

WHEN IT TURNS OUT THAT OBAMA IS AN ILLEGITIMATE HOLDER OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY, ALL BILLS
THAT HE HAS SIGNED INTO LAW SINCE HIS INAUGURATION WILL TURN OUT TO BE NULL AND VOID TOO. VIEWED IN THIS LIGHT, YOU CAN SEE THAT HIS OCCUPATION OF THE WHITE HOUSE IS A REVOLUTIONARY, SUBVERSIVE OPERATION. WELCOME TO THE WORLD REVOLUTION, FOLKS.

• Now we know why the Belgian 'President of the European Union' stated on 14th March that '2009 was the first year of the World Government'.

• BY WHICH IS MEANT: WORLD GOVERNMENT BY THE IMMUNE CRIMINALS. THE WORLD REVOLUTION HAS ALWAYS BEEN FIRST AND FOREMOST A CRIMINAL OPERATION.



NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon's vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the 'highest' levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA's master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this 'in-your-face' by advertising 'INTEL INSIDE', which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the 'fully collaborating' firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable 'file and printer sharing' under any circumstances. If you say 'YES', so to speak, to 'file and printer sharing', your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA's master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton 'Box Gang' and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus softw.

[maelgwyn]

LETS GET OUT OF IT!