All citizens of the State shall be equal as regards rights and duties.
The first duty of every citizen must be to work mentally or physically. The activities of the individual may not clash with the interests of the whole, but must proceed within the frame of the community and be for the general good.
Therefore we demand:
That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.
Since every war imposes on the people fearful sacrifices in life and property, all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as a crime against the people. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits whether in assets or material.
We demand the nationalization of businesses which have been organized into cartels.
We demand that all the profits from wholesale trade shall be shared out.
We demand extensive development of provision for old age.
We demand the creation and maintenance of a healthy middle-class, the immediate communalization of department stores which will be rented cheaply to small businessmen, and that preference shall be given to small businessmen for provision of supplies needed by the State, the provinces and municipalities.
We demand a land reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to confiscate from the owners without compensation any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.
–Adolf Hitler 1925 NAZI Party Manifesto
As the Occupy Wall Street protests become more and more anti-semitic, in both rhetoric and action; the average observer of this phenomenon may do well to research the historical parallels between this contemporary movement and that of past “class struggle” initiatives, allegedly organized through various “grass roots” uprisings in a global context.
Hitler’s NAZI Party was, in fact, a grass roots “workers rights” movement which captured the frustration of the working class and set it into motion against the “Zionist” corporate and banking establishments in Europe at the time. The parallel directives of the NAZI platform and the insinuated platform of the OWS organizers are apparent and beyond the possibility of simply being coincidence, especially when given the simultaneous connections with the “Arab Spring” uprisings in the Middle East region. Another parallel would be that the very “oligarchy” funding the OWS organization, the one it claims to be in direct opposition to, is essentially the same which funded Hitler during WWII; an “oligarchy” he too claimed to be in opposition against.
The objectives of the “Arab Spring” seem just as murky as the objectives of the OWS movement to the casual observer. It is reported to be about “liberty” and “Democracy” on the media front; but the removal of the ME dictators it has falsely been credited with has seemed to effect LESS liberty for the common people living within these nations than it has granted. Unless the installation of fundamentalist Islamic puppet regimes is to be seen as “liberty”, than all the “Arab Spring” has accomplished has been more oppression to the common people than was previously maintained through the deposed “dictators”.
What HAS been accomplished through the Arab Spring “revolution” is a contained perimeter of anti-Jewish governments surrounding the nation of Israel, which could arguably be the primary organized motive of the movement itself. If the intentions of the Oligarchy are parallel to their intentions the previous time such passionate “class struggle” protests were organized; then it can only be concluded that a world warfare directive would be the end result, with the “Jew” once again becoming the ethnic “scapegoat” used as a prime focus, in regards to collectivist blame and social retaliation.
That Socialism, as a political ideology, and Crony-Capitalism are directly correlated is obvious to any individual not in predisposition to advocate for either under the delusions propagated through mass media manipulation. Without Socialism, Crony-Capitalism couldn’t have the corralled consumer base needed in order to monopolize the institutions of capital through government regulations. Neither can be separated from the other without the entire International trade market crumbling from the ensuing competitive individual creativity which would assert itself through an actual free market.
What is fundamentally established through “Socialism” isn’t individual liberty, but a devised institution of prejudice towards the spirit of human progress and creativity within the common man himself. These are the true intentions of the Arab Spring and OWS movements in the world today. The oligarchy broke the progress of the individual through these same tactics during not only The Renaissance and Industrial Revolution; but is now attempting to break the progress of the common man in The Information Age with the exact same “class warfare” schematic; and with this same ethnic anti-”Jewish” propaganda being rhetorically initiated as was before.
Of course, this time the International Socialists will have to contend with an Israeli nuclear arsenal and the 4th largest standing army on the planet. They had best bow down and pray to the G-d they despise, that their sophomoric “Anonymous” comic book geeks are able to corrupt the IDF military grid. Otherwise? The “swiss gnome” may finally just see the light of a new day.
http://www.indylevee.com/2011/10/21/the-global-rise-of-neo-international-socialism/
Topic: The Rise of Neo-International Socialism (Read 789 times)