« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: They are seriously calling it this?  (Read 2006 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rubystars

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 18307
  • Extreme MAGA Republican
They are seriously calling it this?
« on: April 12, 2012, 01:33:38 PM »
Logged

Online angryChineseKahanist

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 10542
  • ☭=卐=☮
Re: They are seriously calling it this?
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2012, 02:05:53 PM »
that was weird.
Logged
U+262d=U+5350=U+9774

Offline Rubystars

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 18307
  • Extreme MAGA Republican
Re: They are seriously calling it this?
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2012, 02:09:15 PM »
Quote from: angryChineseKahanist on April 12, 2012, 02:05:53 PM
that was weird.

Very weird. I just found out about this and I have to say I really don't like that name.
Logged

Offline Dr. Dan

  • Forum Administrator
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12593
Re: They are seriously calling it this?
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2012, 02:28:43 PM »
Tower of babel.  Just lovely
Logged
If someone says something bad about you, say something nice about them. That way, both of you would be lying.

In your heart you know WE are right and in your guts you know THEY are nuts!

"Science without religion is lame; Religion without science is blind."  - Albert Einstein

Offline Rubystars

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 18307
  • Extreme MAGA Republican
Re: They are seriously calling it this?
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2012, 03:03:51 PM »
Quote from: Dr. Dan on April 12, 2012, 02:28:43 PM
Tower of babel.  Just lovely

Good point!
Logged

Offline briann

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 8038
  • Mmmm HMMMMM
Re: They are seriously calling it this?
« Reply #5 on: April 12, 2012, 03:52:00 PM »
They were considering it calling it King Obama Tower.  Here is an artists conception:


Logged

Offline cjd

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 8996
Re: They are seriously calling it this?
« Reply #6 on: April 12, 2012, 06:35:37 PM »
Yes, that's what they are calling it... It seems China is one of the larger of the future tenants and they objected to it being called the Freedom Tower....
Logged
He who overlooks one crime invites the commission of another.        Syrus.

A light on to the nations for 60 years

Offline Ephraim Ben Noach

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 5019
Re: They are seriously calling it this?
« Reply #7 on: April 12, 2012, 06:37:43 PM »
What! China doesn't like freedom?
Logged
Ezekiel 33:6 But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the horn, and the people be not warned, and the sword do come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity, but his blood will I require at the watchman's hand.

Offline Rubystars

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 18307
  • Extreme MAGA Republican
Re: They are seriously calling it this?
« Reply #8 on: April 12, 2012, 08:11:07 PM »
Quote from: cjd on April 12, 2012, 06:35:37 PM
Yes, that's what they are calling it... It seems China is one of the larger of the future tenants and they objected to it being called the Freedom Tower....

China has way too much power over the USA. Seriously scary.

It seems like there are plenty of leftists in the USA itself though that would want a name like that. You know how they all want open borders and talk about being "world citizens" and all that garbage.

What I find strange is that the workers in the article are speaking as if this is a patriotic tower, when in reality the whole "One world" concept is about as anti-patriotic as it can get.

Quote from: briann on April 12, 2012, 03:52:00 PM
They were considering it calling it King Obama Tower.  Here is an artists conception:

LOL good one briann. :)

Quote from: Ephraim on April 12, 2012, 06:37:43 PM
What! China doesn't like freedom?

lol
Logged

Offline HiWarp

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1867
Re: They are seriously calling it this?
« Reply #9 on: April 13, 2012, 07:30:32 AM »
Are you guys serious? It is not "One World" Trade Center. It is 1 World Trade Center. There's also a 2 and a 3 and a 4 World Trade Center. It's an address, for goodness sake. I think you're reading a bit too much into it.
Logged
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny;
when the government fears the people, there is liberty.”
---Thomas Jefferson

Offline Rubystars

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 18307
  • Extreme MAGA Republican
Re: They are seriously calling it this?
« Reply #10 on: April 13, 2012, 07:34:33 AM »
Quote from: HiWarp on April 13, 2012, 07:30:32 AM
Are you guys serious? It is not "One World" Trade Center. It is 1 World Trade Center. There's also a 2 and a 3 and a 4 World Trade Center. It's an address, for goodness sake. I think you're reading a bit too much into it.

I'm wondering why they happened to make that one the tallest building. Plus if you read the article that's how they are spelling it, not as an address but referring to it as if it were its name.

Also sometimes things like that can come up and they're meant to be subliminal, and someone like you could legitimately give an explanation for the name, but at the end of the day the tallest building in North America will still be called "One World" trade center, whether it's spelled that way or not.
Logged

Online angryChineseKahanist

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 10542
  • ☭=卐=☮
Re: They are seriously calling it this?
« Reply #11 on: April 13, 2012, 08:45:02 AM »
Quote from: briann on April 12, 2012, 03:52:00 PM
They were considering it calling it King Obama Tower.  Here is an artists conception:




Why did you put up that picture of Michelle Obama?
Logged
U+262d=U+5350=U+9774

Offline briann

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 8038
  • Mmmm HMMMMM
Re: They are seriously calling it this?
« Reply #12 on: April 13, 2012, 12:03:54 PM »
Quote from: angryChineseKahanist on April 13, 2012, 08:45:02 AM

Why did you put up that picture of Michelle Obama?

While we are on the subject:




Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »