The Worldwide Crisis of Islam > The Truth About Islam
Peace - Salaam - Shalom
Zvulun Ben Moshe:
--- Quote from: Abdullah on July 11, 2007, 02:09:54 AM ---I have a qustion about your "timeless" Religion. Why is it called Judaism?
Who was your first Prophet?
Who was your last Prophet?
How many Prophets do you belive in?
Peace
--- End quote ---
OK. At least you are willing to learn, and don't hide behind your arrogant questions.
What you call my timeless religion, and it really is (won't argue with you here), is called Judaism only for reference to distinguish it from Christianity and Islam.
There is no original name to my religion, other than belief in One G-d.
Now, after Islam was invented, Muslims claimed to believe in the same G-d, and that’s why Mohammed called it Islam to distinguish it from the original religion of One G-d.
Jews themselves did not call it Judaism until other religions came into existence.
Jews for thousands of years were the only people on the face of the Earth to believe in One G-d.
So how would you identify a Jew in those times? You would simply ask him if he believes in One G-d.
How would you identify others, like Arabs, at that time? You would ask him If believes in stones and animals.
The term Judaism is coming from Juda, or Yehuda, meaning Ye (One) Huda (G-d).
My first prophet was Abraham.
My last prophet was Oded, not Mohammed and not Isa (Jesus).
There are 48 prophets and 7 prophetesses that I believe in.
Any other questions?
Abdullah:
Jazak'Allah I did not know exactly what you belived.
I actually do have another question, Do you belive in the Angels? Do you belive in the Jinn? Do you belive in the day of Judgement?
It might sound like I'm trying to help you make Shahada but I'm not. I've never actually asked a Jew before. I'm not interested in converting mind you, but just curious.
Peace
Mishmaat:
--- Quote from: Abdullah on July 11, 2007, 02:02:38 AM ---First I will say that I never claimed to be a master Debator or genious, I still don't.
I also gave you not 1 link in my post, There was one in there but it was not for the explaination of you question but rather ftf's.
I also diden't say your "news" site wasen't reliable because its right-wing, I said it wasen't relaibale because of the sources it uses to get its stories. It dosen't even claim to be the one quoteing the person that there reporting about. Theres nothing wrong with right-wing, but It is not a reliable source for news. Why don't you give the FULL speach if your so sure of it.
You talk about the treaty of Hudaibiya. You claim it was violated by the Muslims when it was IN FACT violated by the Meccans. If you want to argue that then back it up.
I also don't get why your bringing up so much from the past- long before the speech I was talking about. Your being far to general by saying that since a Muslim got his picture with Hittler were all nazis.
I deny that ONE "news' source is inaccurate and you claim I don't belive any news. It just not true and not what I said.
Why don't you try to answer the questions I asked you in the Last post?
You keep making wild allegations, not acknoleging when I call you out to prove them.
You diden't really ask any question in your last post or answer any.
--- End quote ---
Abdullah is a rather interesting name. It means "slave to Allah". Despite the commentary by the Rambam on Islam I do NOT consider Allah to be G-d. G-d has many divine titles and a distinct ineffable name. As far as I can ascertain from the Torah and the entire Tanakh, none of them are Allah. A correct translation of the term "Allahu Akhbar" is "Allah is Greatest". Allah may have come to mean "G-d" or "the G-d" in modern Arabic, but it is derived from the name of a pagan rock idol. This is akin to the word gay in modern English. The term has become synonomous with homosexual, but its original and correct meaning is happy. I apply the same logic to Allah. It may be hard to stomach, but you've willfully submitted your soul to a black stone.
The most damning evidence is in your own scriptures. The Qur'an is a book literally devoid of any context and chronology. It is laughable to believe that a perfect being would inspire such an insane book. The Hadith collections, while having some semblance of context and chronolgy, are filled with hatred and intolerance for non-Muslims.
The Tanakh ("Tanach") is a rich inspiring book filled with an abundance of magnificent prophecies, some of which have come to being in our own time. The Qur'an is a lie. A fabricated distortion. The illiterate Muhammad plagiarized and bastardized stories from the Oral Torah that he purchased from the Jews. Those stories comprise a bulk of the "religious" aspect of Islam. For the most part it is a war manifesto.
The treaty you're referring to was a method of luring the Meccans into a false sense of peace. The late and unlamented Yasser Arafat, yimach shemo vizichro (may his name and memory be obliterated) utilized the same tactic of deception through "peace" treaties with Israel.
As far as news sources, I can use them to augment my argument, but the Islamic scriptures are sufficient enough to prove that Islam is Satanic.
Mishmaat:
--- Quote from: Abdullah on July 11, 2007, 02:53:26 AM ---Jazak'Allah I did not know exactly what you belived.
I actually do have another question, Do you belive in the Angels? Do you belive in the Jinn? Do you belive in the day of Judgement?
It might sound like I'm trying to help you make Shahada but I'm not. I've never actually asked a Jew before. I'm not interested in converting mind you, but just curious.
Peace
--- End quote ---
This comment wasn't addressed to me, but I'll answer it if you don't mind Zvulun.
I believe that Angels are God's perfect messengers.
I don't believe in demons.
Of course there will be a day of judgement.
newman:
I told you you were woshiping a rock idol, abdulla. How much money have those arabs bilked you out of for peddling that pack of lies?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version