Self-Hating Jewish Nazi Lawyers Defend Negro Crack Addict Serial Killer

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

Texas Woman's Execution Halted Over Concerns Of Racial Discrimination

http://news.yahoo.com/texas-womans-execution-halted-da-wont-appeal-201259603.html

No words. Once again, no words. This witch that hacked an old lady to death and two others with a machete will probably now walk out of jail, while Jonathan Pollard is still on federal death row.

"We are very pleased that we will now have an opportunity to present evidence of discrimination in the selection of the jury that sentenced Kimberly McCarthy to death," said Maurie Levin, a University of Texas law professor and McCarthy's lawyer.
"Of the twelve jurors seated at trial, all were white, except one, and eligible non-white jurors were excluded from serving by the state. ... These facts must be understood in the context of the troubling and long-standing history of racial discrimination in jury selection in Dallas County, including at the time of Ms. McCarthy's trial," Levin said.

And I'm sure that the vast majority of the American public agrees with this.

WFTMPTC


Triple murderer Kimberly McCarthy

[mord]

I've come expect this from secular anti G-D Jews

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

I've come expect this from secular anti G-D Jews

When she gets this monster released, Maurie Levin should put her up in her guest room until she can find a job and afford her own place. Think she will?

[mord]

When she gets this monster released, Maurie Levin should put her up in her guest room until she can find a job and afford her own place. Think she will?

Not a chance

[muman613]

You are sure she is Jewish? You cannot tell these days by last name... Assume that her father may have been Jewish and her mother was not, she would still have the last name Levin... Or maybe some people assume all lawyers must be Jews?

[mord]

You are sure she is Jewish? You cannot tell these days by last name... Assume that her father may have been Jewish and her mother was not, she would still have the last name Levin... Or maybe some people assume all lawyers must be Jews?

Actually she doesn't lok too Jewish     http://www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/ml4477/

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

Not a chance

Then she doesn't really care about her client's welfare.

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

Actually she doesn't lok too Jewish     http://www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/ml4477/

You know there's no such thing as a "Jewish look".

[angryChineseKahanist]

No way that gorgeous babe could have possibly did it.
It be racism. Yeah, all da jurors be honkey crackers!
She be innocent like brotha oj simpson.

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

No way that gorgeous babe could have possibly did it.
It be racism. Yeah, all da jurors be honkey crackers!
She be innocent like brotha oj simpson.

You said it right ACK. Maurie Levin is absolutely right that McCarthy is a victim of institutionalized prejudice.

[t_h_j]

Isn't Pollard scheduled to be released in 2015?

[USAReturn2GodNow1776]

Most of us gentiles who are not noahides don't believe in the rabbinical doctrine of how Jewishness is transmitted (only from Jewish mother or from orthodox conversion). Some of us get from the Bible that it is paternal descent, not maternal descent. Others think of Jewishness like Italianness or any other nationality. What makes someone Italian is not completely clear. Most would agree that someone with only one Italian parent is Italian and that someone with only one Italian great grandparent is not Italian. But where you would draw the line between Italian and not Italian is not clear. Having a sense of Italian identity probably counts for something too. If someone has a sense of Italian identity because of their only Italian great grandparent, then perhaps they are still Italian. But someone with no Italian ancestry who was born in Africa or China and has never met anyone of Italian descent but had a sense of Italian identity we would call delusional.

[muman613]

Most of us gentiles who are not noahides don't believe in the rabbinical doctrine of how Jewishness is transmitted (only from Jewish mother or from orthodox conversion). Some of us get from the Bible that it is paternal descent, not maternal descent. Others think of Jewishness like Italianness or any other nationality. What makes someone Italian is not completely clear. Most would agree that someone with only one Italian parent is Italian and that someone with only one Italian great grandparent is not Italian. But where you would draw the line between Italian and not Italian is not clear. Having a sense of Italian identity probably counts for something too. If someone has a sense of Italian identity because of their only Italian great grandparent, then perhaps they are still Italian. But someone with no Italian ancestry who was born in Africa or China and has never met anyone of Italian descent but had a sense of Italian identity we would call delusional.

The Jewishness of a child is determined by the mother as per the Torah's explanation which commands a Jewish man to marry a Jewish woman, otherwise the child is not considered Jewish. It doesn't really matter what anyone thinks about it, this is the way the Jewish people determine who is Jewish or not. This is the Halacha and anyone who expects to be considered Jewish by a Jewish court must abide by the Halacha...

http://ohr.edu/ask_db/ask_main.php/202/Q1/

Dear Rabbi,
What is the halachic source of matrilineal descent? Why are we set against patrilineal descent when all of our ancestors in the Torah are referred to as so and so son of so and so, referring only to the father's name?

Dear Nathan Silberstein,

In the time of the Patriarchs it appears that descent followed the father. However, the period of the Patriarchs was before the giving of the Torah on Mount Sinai. It was only with the revelation on Sinai that the Jewish people received their legal system. Therefore it is impossible to bring Halachic, legal proofs from the Patriarchs. Our source for Halacha is the Written and Oral Torah.

The Mishna in Tractate Kiddushin 66b states that if a child's mother is not Jewish, then the child is not Jewish.

The Babylonian Talmud, Kiddushin 68b, derives this Halacha from a verse in Deuteronomy 7:1-5, which also contains the prohibition against intermarriage. "When the L-rd your G-d brings you to the land that you will inherit, many nations will fall away before you; the Hittites, the Girgashites, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Prizites, the Hivites and the Jebusites... And you shall not marry with them; do not give your daughters to his sons and do not take his daughters for your sons. For he will turn your son away from me and they will worship other gods...." The Talmud points out that the verse only seems to be concerned with the son of the Israelite woman being turned away, "for he (the gentile)" will turn your son away. It does not seem to be concerned that "she (the gentile) will turn your son away." The implication is that the son of the Jewish woman and gentile man is still considered "your (the Jewish grandfather in this case) son," but in the case of a gentile woman married to a Jewish man, the child is not considered "your son" and therefore there is no concern about his turning away. This follows Rashi and Tosfot Ri Hazaken in their explanation of the Gemara.

Tosfot (ad loc. "Amar krah") offers a number of different methods of derivation from the verse, but agrees with the conclusion. This law is also found in the Mishna in Yevamot (ch. 2, 21a): "He counts as a brother in every respect unless he was the son of a maidservant or of a gentile woman."

This halacha is codified in the Code of Jewish Law, Even HaEzer 8:5, and in Maimonides' Mishneh Torah, Laws of Forbidden Relationships, 15:4. Maimonides states: "This is the general rule: The status of an offspring from a gentile man or from a gentile woman is the same as his mother's; we disregard the father."

Another source in the Torah is the verse in Leviticus 24:10: "the son of an Israelite woman went out - and he was the son of an Egyptian man." This person is described as being "in the midst of the community of Israel" - in other words, Jewish.

Probably the most explicit verse against patrilineal descent is in the book of Ezra 10:2-3: Some of the Jews who had returned from the exile declare, "We have trespassed against our G-d and have taken foreign wives of the people of the land. Yet, there is hope in Israel concerning this thing. Therefore, let us make a covenant with our G-d to put away all the wives and such as are born to them, according to the counsel of the L-rd and of those who assemble at the commandment of G-d; let it be done according to the law."

Sources are also in Midrash Rabbah, Numbers, 19, and Jerusalem Talmud, Kiddushin 3:12.

Do we ignore the father completely? Certainly not. The father is the one who determines what tribe the child is from. That is: Kohen, Levi, Yisrael. Also, in determining royalty and other leadership roles among the Jewish people we go from father to son.

PS: It was the Nazis who considered Jewishness like Italianess and other nesses... See the Nuremburg laws... Also there is NO Biblical source for Patrilineal descent (unless you can provide a source).