Author Topic: The Rockefellers  (Read 2927 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
The Rockefellers
« on: May 03, 2007, 08:37:34 AM »
Nelson Rockefeller ran for president in 1960, 1964 and 1968 but didn't win the nomination innay of them.  Why wasn't the CFR able to get him the nominated?

« Last Edit: May 03, 2007, 07:25:16 PM by Yacov Menashe Ben Rachamim »

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: The Rockefellers
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2007, 08:17:22 PM »
Nelson Rockefeller was Gerald Ford's Vice President. Neither were elected. Ford was appointed by Nixon when Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned. This was because of an amendment to The Constitution. When Kennedy was assassinated, there was no replacement VP when Lyndon Johnson became President. Ford became President  when Nixon resigned. So the amendment was again used for him to appoint a replacement VP.




But why was CFR never able to get Rockefeller nominated into a general election as a Presidential candidate?

Offline MassuhDGoodName

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4542
Re: The Rockefellers
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2007, 09:27:17 PM »
Re:  "...why was CFR never able to get Rockefeller nominated..."

To which Rockefeller do you refer?

There are several with that surname.

If by chance you refer to the "Rockefeller" of "the man behind the curtain" / "puppetmaster" fame, then your answer would be that such a man prefers to rule "behind the scenes" by using his tremendous wealth and resources to control things as he sees fit; all the while never having to shake hands or kiss babies.

Offline cjd

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 8984
Re: The Rockefellers
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2007, 10:08:34 PM »
Re:  "...why was CFR never able to get Rockefeller nominated..."

To which Rockefeller do you refer?

There are several with that surname.

If by chance you refer to the "Rockefeller" of "the man behind the curtain" / "puppetmaster" fame, then your answer would be that such a man prefers to rule "behind the scenes" by using his tremendous wealth and resources to control things as he sees fit; all the while never having to shake hands or kiss babies.
Massuh, I have to agree with you on this post however Nelson Rockefeller was the sort of man that wanted to get his name into the history books. Although he had the money and power to do almost anything he wanted the sad fact was that he was never able to attain the seat in the oval office. He was able to gain the vice presidency only because of the Watergate scandal since at the time most politicians wanted nothing to do with the office of the presidency. If Ford would have gained reelection Nelson might have had a shot at the presidency after Ford. The sad fact was that time was running out for him. He should have been more concerned about his health instead of cavorting with his girlfriend who caused him to over do it and having his hart give out in a very embarrassing situation.
He who overlooks one crime invites the commission of another.        Syrus.

A light on to the nations for 60 years


Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: The Rockefellers
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2007, 10:39:12 PM »
Re:  "...why was CFR never able to get Rockefeller nominated..."

To which Rockefeller do you refer?

There are several with that surname.

If by chance you refer to the "Rockefeller" of "the man behind the curtain" / "puppetmaster" fame, then your answer would be that such a man prefers to rule "behind the scenes" by using his tremendous wealth and resources to control things as he sees fit; all the while never having to shake hands or kiss babies.
Massuh, I have to agree with you on this post however Nelson Rockefeller was the sort of man that wanted to get his name into the history books. Although he had the money and power to do almost anything he wanted the sad fact was that he was never able to attain the seat in the oval office. He was able to gain the vice presidency only because of the Watergate scandal since at the time most politicians wanted nothing to do with the office of the presidency. If Ford would have gained reelection Nelson might have had a shot at the presidency after Ford. The sad fact was that time was running out for him. He should have been more concerned about his health instead of cavorting with his girlfriend who caused him to over do it and having his hart give out in a very embarrassing situation.


When Ford ran for re-election (his first election as a presidential candidate, he had been running as a member of H.O.R. years ago),  Bob Dole was his vice-presidential candidate.  Either Rockefeller decided he didn't want to run with Ford for re-election or Ford didn't want him anymore. 

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: The Rockefellers
« Reply #5 on: May 04, 2007, 10:42:57 PM »
Re:  "...why was CFR never able to get Rockefeller nominated..."

To which Rockefeller do you refer?

There are several with that surname.

If by chance you refer to the "Rockefeller" of "the man behind the curtain" / "puppetmaster" fame, then your answer would be that such a man prefers to rule "behind the scenes" by using his tremendous wealth and resources to control things as he sees fit; all the while never having to shake hands or kiss babies.


How much power does CFR have?  Is their primary interest international issues and they mostly ignore issues such as abortion? 

Did CFR want the Islamic Revolution to occur in Iran? 


Is Ben Bernanke, a member of CFR?  If not, why is he the head of the Federal Reserve? 

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: The Rockefellers
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2007, 12:53:41 AM »
Could someone give examples of policies they've dictated over the years?

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: The Rockefellers
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2007, 01:18:07 AM »
They control the State Department?   

Offline cosmokramer

  • Pro JTFer
  • *****
  • Posts: 623
Re: The Rockefellers
« Reply #8 on: May 16, 2007, 05:33:32 AM »
The Rockefellers are very evil people. John D. Rockafeller drove many companies out of buisness when he had standard oil. Their whole family is to blame for alot of the troubles tha happened in history. They are new world order rulers.

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: The Rockefellers
« Reply #9 on: May 18, 2007, 08:36:54 PM »
The Rockefellers are very evil people. John D. Rockafeller drove many companies out of buisness when he had standard oil. Their whole family is to blame for alot of the troubles tha happened in history. They are new world order rulers.


I suspect that they caused the Great Depression.

Offline Duncan

  • Junior JTFer
  • **
  • Posts: 30
Re: The Rockefellers
« Reply #10 on: June 08, 2007, 09:39:40 AM »
I think the negative impression of rockefellers in the American psyche would have prevented such a candidate from becoming POTUS. However, it has been several decades and the new generation of idiot/sheeple/American voters that exist today would probably vote for a rockefeller-type candidate because they don't understand history of the globalists, nor do they understand the goals of the CFR/TC/BB agenda.


« Last Edit: June 08, 2007, 11:24:06 PM by Duncan »
Proverbs 1:22 - “How long, you simple ones, will you love simplicity? For scorners delight in their scorning, And fools hate knowledge."



___________________
NRA, GOA, SAF, JFPO
__________________

كافر | ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ | WOLVERINES!
_____________________________

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: The Rockefellers
« Reply #11 on: July 18, 2007, 03:14:18 AM »
Someone who claimed to be associated with CFR was talking to the media and bashing US policies.  Isn't that hypocrisy if CFR has a big influence in the policies?  Or by giving the impression that they dislike the policies, people will be less likely to believe that CFR has a big influence?