Tancredo can be trusted on both Iran and on domestic policy.
Do you not think a more well-rounded candidate has a better chance? Hunter has a good military record and would be credible with national security.
Tancredo talks a lot about immigration--in fact, this is the basically all he discusses. In addition to discussing the issue, Hunter ensured that a border fence was built in San Diego.
Hunter has a record of defending conservatives for more than a decade--not Republicans, but conservatives.
Tancredo is also careless at times with words which would get him in trouble during an election. I like Tancredo, but Hunter is the better candidate. Tancredo is probably my 2nd choice.