The Muslims Demand Queen Elizabeth Convert To Islam

[Binyamin Yisrael]

http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2017/06/16/lol-alert-british-muslims-are-now-demanding-the-queen-convert-to-islam-or-leave-the-country-as-they-want-buckingham-palace-turned-into-a-mosque.html

[eb22]

http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2017/06/16/lol-alert-british-muslims-are-now-demanding-the-queen-convert-to-islam-or-leave-the-country-as-they-want-buckingham-palace-turned-into-a-mosque.html

This is yet another example of what appeasement leads to.  Appeasement is something that Western Europe has been consistent with and is heavily paying the price. 

[Zelhar]

It is somewhat conceivable that one of her inbred successors would convert, they are certainly dhimmis so converting to Islam is the next logical step, especially as it is likely to become the biggest religion in the UK within a few decades.

[Binyamin Yisrael]

If they converted, then they would have to abolish The Church of England or abdicate. They might have to change the law. The monarch is required to be Anglican and is considered the head of the Church.

[Zelhar]

It is somewhat likely that they will change the law at some point regardless because it is discrimination and not fair that only Anglicans qualify to sit on the throne.

If they converted, then they would have to abolish The Church of England or abdicate. They might have to change the law. The monarch is required to be Anglican and is considered the head of the Church.

[Binyamin Yisrael]

It is somewhat likely that they will change the law at some point regardless because it is discrimination and not fair that only Anglicans qualify to sit on the throne.

Then they might as well abolish the monarchy because it wouldn't be England anymore, at least not the United Kingdom of Great Britain. The Church of England and the Monarchy associated with it is what defines the country. The Church is also what defines the Monarchy. They would have to just call it England and give Scotland and Wales independence.

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

Britainistan. It could actually happen (the royals converting to Sh!tlam).

[Zelhar]

There are noticeable historic precedence for change of religion of monarchies and whole nations. England itself used to be Catholic until Henry the 8th created the church of England. Switches between Catholic and Protestant happened throughout Europe during the reformation. But there are also cases of converting to entirely different religion. In the early middle ages all the nobles and monarchs in Europe converted at some point from paganism to Catholicism but of course they retained their sovereignty. The royals of the present are direct decedents of these pagan warlords. Also Conversion of nobility from Christianity to Islam had occurred in the balkans and the caucus. And conversion of nobility from Islam to Christianity also has precedence in Spain and Russia.
 

Then they might as well abolish the monarchy because it wouldn't be England anymore, at least not the United Kingdom of Great Britain. The Church of England and the Monarchy associated with it is what defines the country. The Church is also what defines the Monarchy. They would have to just call it England and give Scotland and Wales independence.

[Binyamin Yisrael]

I don't see how a modern European monarchy would convert to Islam. They like to innermarry with royalty (which is why the British Royal Family is mixed with all kinds of European) but they wouldn't marry an Arab royal family member. In fact the opposite is true. King Hussein married a British woman and she converted to Islam.

People say that the Queen had Princess Diana killed because she was dating a Muslim and they didn't want the future King of England to have a brother named Mohammad.

[Zelhar]

People make up lots of ridiculous conspiracy theories. The hashemites are not a real royal house. They are pimps installed by the british empire as puppet rulers of an artificial nation.

I don't see how a modern European monarchy would convert to Islam. They like to innermarry with royalty (which is why the British Royal Family is mixed with all kinds of European) but they wouldn't marry an Arab royal family member. In fact the opposite is true. King Hussein married a British woman and she converted to Islam.

People say that the Queen had Princess Diana killed because she was dating a Muslim and they didn't want the future King of England to have a brother named Mohammad.

[Binyamin Yisrael]

People make up lots of ridiculous conspiracy theories. The hashemites are not a real royal house. They are pimps installed by the british empire as puppet rulers of an artificial nation.

Say that about any Arab royal house. Their claim to royalty is that they are descended from Mohammad.

It's not just Arabs. I don't see how they could marry someone from other Non-European royal lines either. Ethiopia had an Emperor. Japan has an Emperor. Do you seriously think European royalty would intermarry with them?

[Zelhar]

Just like they can and do marry a commoner they can marry a moor.

Say that about any Arab royal house. Their claim to royalty is that they are descended from Mohammad.

It's not just Arabs. I don't see how they could marry someone from other Non-European royal lines either. Ethiopia had an Emperor. Japan has an Emperor. Do you seriously think European royalty would intermarry with them?

[Joe Gutfeld]

They have enough muslims in England.

[syyuge]

They will also have to decide whether they have to become sunni or shia or ahmadiya or wahabi or hanafi.

[syyuge]

Porks, ham, bacon and some sausages may not be available to them.

[Nachus]

                                                                                                      

 Of course, this is in the Queen's best interest cause they want to make sure that
 England remains a peaceful nation!        

[angryChineseKahanist]

As much as I don't care about the Queen, this is bad. She better stand up for herself.

[Nachus]

                                                                                                        


 Angry Chinese Kahanist is right. This is a hazard and sets a dangerous precedent for
 "leaders" in the historically, predominantly evil continent of Europe where more and
 more 'leaders' could be ultimately subjugated to the same type of demands and will
 most likely succumb to them!