There were a few protests for George Floyd, but mostly for Soros and he also likes the looting that people do mostly for themselves. There are a few burn it all down activists, and they're great to hide behind while you be a thief because they are convinced their anger means they believe something.
Still, I like to think about how if the media was promoting all day police brutality to Asians or Jews or otherwise how they'd react, and theft and arson probably wouldn't top the list. So the black community gets a lot of sympathy for a death, so many things they could organize and do to protect themselves and capitalize on the sympathy. But the guy was probably a junkie they didn't and don't care about, so massive numbers of people run out in the street and rob and loot. Muslims would taharrush - mass public gang rape riot, it's their protest thing they do in Egypt. You can't convince a crowd in Vermont to up and at em with a rape riot of the whole village, just like burn and loot your favorite stores or random ones wouldn't have special appeal.
I'm talking to black people about it, they will admit 100% that there is a right way to deal with this that will benefit them, and then like clockwork, after analyzing and admitting the truth they say, "but f it, burn it all down". It's too many to not be a coincidence at this point, and my theories range from cues in rap or the news or weird screwy-louie type religions, but no idea at this point. Repeat arguments yield the same process and result. Like a spell that instantly convinces people that nothing matters, like well we're all going do die so might as well go wild. My version of wild doesn't include hurting anyone at the nice corner store, but still I have the human capacity for mercy on my future self through being able to make decisions based on likely consequences. Who decided if you're going to die you should do that? You need a clear thinker like Daniel Greenfield or something to make any sense of this mess.