Torah and Jewish Idea > Torah and Jewish Idea

Ticket to Heaven Daily Dose

<< < (13/20) > >>

Hrvatski Noahid:
But what does the science say?

A 2019 study on the relationship between genetics and homosexuality which involved almost half a million Europeans found that genes can only account for between eight and twenty-five percent of homosexual behavior. Although this is not a perfect comparison due to differences in the studies, genetics have been found to drive forty percent of divorce behavior and the majority of bipolar predisposition, strongly indicating that homosexuality is not driven by genetics. Investigations into intrauterine factors that might drive homosexuality such as fetal hormone exposure, as well as theories about evolutionary origins such as kin group optimization, remain inconclusive, unproven, weak, or implausible.

However, much more in line with Paglia’s estimation and the lives of Andersen and Spitzer, a study published in 2012 found that homosexuals were significantly more likely to have been sexually abused as children when compared to their heterosexual counterparts, and that this likely plays some kind of causal role. These findings were foreshadowed by another high-quality study published four years earlier and seem relevant to the treatment of LGBTQ individuals given the trauma that would cascade into other mental health issues typical for victims of childhood sexual abuse, which are many.

Furthermore, Canadian-led research on over one thousand male homosexuals in the twentieth century found a pervasive trend in the male homosexual’s family dynamic where the mother was inappropriately close, controlling, smothering, and inappropriately emotionally bonded with her male child, sometimes even becoming sexually inappropriate in similar ways that she would with female friends. Meanwhile, the father was cold, abusive, competitive, and rejecting – much like Robert Spitzer’s was reported to be.

These findings, too, have been corroborated by studies of homosexual clergy members, as well as a 2005 study involving two million Danish subjects, but have been flatly, aggressively, and even violently denied by activists who are adamant that there is nothing wrong with them whatsoever.

Given the context of homosexuality’s removal from the DSM and Spitzer’s own life history, these findings are extremely troubling and indicate there is a tremendous amount of unrecognized and unresolved pain in the homosexual community. This hypothesis is supported by a significant amount of literature on LGBTQ mental health, including studies that find homosexual and bisexual men are nearly three times as promiscuous as heterosexual men, are more likely to have been paid for sex, and engage in extreme sexual acts significantly more often. Non-heterosexuals are much more likely to be dependent on drugs and are more likely to have a diagnosed disorder such as bipolar, panic disorder, borderline personality disorder, or obsessive-compulsive disorder. (Ticket to Heaven by Zachary R.J. Strong, PDF version, p 72)

Hrvatski Noahid:
In the context of monogamous same-sex relationships, which are rarer than admitted despite the fierce fight for their recognition, homosexual relationships are more unstable and likely to be plagued by infidelity as well as more violent: male-male partners are just as likely to be violent as heterosexual couples, if not more, and lesbian pairings are the most violent kind of relationship.

The metaphysical switcheroo perpetrated by Robert Spitzer in 1973 was not entirely a terrible thing, as it catalyzed the general acceptance of not only homosexuals, but people with all kinds of diverse attributes, including disabilities and other mental illnesses. Today, homosexuals are celebrated for their many achievements – predominantly artistic, likely but not confirmedly due to genetic predispositions to extraversion and openness – and even gender-diverse people are beginning to find acceptance. At the very least, there is more room for different kinds of masculine and feminine expression and some aspects of rigidity during formative years has been relaxed.

However, the metaphysical crimes perpetrated by corrupt psychologists have had terrible costs for Western nations. The undiagnosed mental health issues of the homosexual population, which cascade into extremely promiscuous and risky behavior, have been the root cause of the AIDS crisis that took the lives of many homosexuals as well as the recent monkeypox scare. Gay pride has since turned into an industry, with abused men, and now children, paraded as drag queens on national television instead of getting the help they need.

As disappointing as these series of lies have been, the rot goes much deeper with the psychological bodies. Following the depathologization of homosexuality in 1973, LGBTQ activists with a neo-Marxist agenda began infiltrating the field, eager to gain and wield professional power in service of a demographic that had long been poorly served by electroshock therapy and morphine. However, fifty years into the deception, what started as a push for mere acceptance has devolved into the sick and calculated destruction of entire generations of children, whose bodies and minds have been sacrificed at the altar of inclusion. (Ticket to Heaven by Zachary R.J. Strong, PDF version, p 73)

Hrvatski Noahid:
If Hans Christian Andersen, the original ugly duckling, were alive today, there is a high chance he would be either transgendered or nonbinary. Indeed, the World Professional Association for Transgender Health’s definitive report on transgender science and the standards of care for transgendered individuals cites evidence that over seventy-seven percent of prepubescent boys referred to clinics for gender dysphoria ended up desisting, or no longer experiencing dysphoric feelings into adolescence. The same is true for girls, for whom seventy-three percent desisted around puberty. Most of these children were documented to become homosexuals or bisexuals instead, much like Hans Christian Andersen was believed to be.

However, despite these realities, new research in transgender “science” has since swept through Western nations to the point where gender-affirming care is now mandated by Canadian law should a child begin to express dysphoria to a parent or caregiver. In many school districts, teachers can help “socially transition” children without parental knowledge or consent. Some governments in American states like California are enacting similarly radical legislation, purportedly to benefit children given the astronomically high suicide rate amongst the transgender population.

The various issues surrounding the claims of transgender activists have led to unprecedented social turmoil in North America, becoming one of the rare social issues to become as polarized as race. The West’s concessions to the “scientific” demands of have resulted, so far, in “penised women” entering spas and disrobing in front of women and female children, female estheticians being sued for not waxing a “woman’s” testicles, a woman’s skull being broken by a transgendered individual in a martial arts bout, and dangerous male-bodied offenders being housed with female inmates.

But what of this new transgender science? Where did it come from?

Ultimately, this author personally witnessed the devolution of the LGBTQ movement during his own involvement with it throughout the 2010s. Even in universities at that time, transgendered people were quite rare, although most people on campus were familiar with them. In the mid-2010s, however, the ideas became more mainstream in LGBTQ thought and therefore in academia, which leans liberal in almost all disciplines except the hard sciences. During this time, the author joined an online group dedicated to transgender science, and after observing the academic discussions for about three years, it became clear that the group had begun seeding their studies using each other and themselves as research subjects.

These activist-academics had also come to explicitly reject the standards for transgender care as espoused by the World Professional Association of Transgender Health in favour of radical and unproven notions of gender which have since become commonplace in Western discourse. By forming loosely distributed and largely informal networks of pseudo-scholars, neo-Marxist and academics who could all cite and reference each other, they – and other activist-academics – have been able to usurp the scientific method and confuse many people terribly. (Ticket to Heaven by Zachary R.J. Strong, PDF version, p 73-74)

Hrvatski Noahid:
The result is that about eighty percent of children, if not more, who are receiving puberty blockers and sex reassignment surgeries, or even gender-affirming care that does not first investigate childhood traumas like sexual abuse, are being intentionally neglected by a corrupted discipline that cares more about legitimizing its own mental illness than it does about alleviating others’ suffering. Even worse, their parents are being told that the only other option to gender-affirming care is a dead child, with the tremendously high suicide rates of gender dysphoric individuals provided as evidence that they are obliged to comply.

Furthermore, the transitioning process, which involves hormone treatments and surgeries to construct new sexual organs, is held by transgender activists to be the panacea of the condition. Yet, the suicide rate for transgendered people who have fully transitioned remains twenty times that of the population average in some studies. Additionally, the ranks of so-called “detransitioners”, or people who regret their transition, are growing. This demographic, many of whom are women on the autism spectrum, cite other issues for their dysphoric feelings and report feeling influenced by the lies propagated by activists online.

Instead of allowing their ugly ducklings to grow into swans, a colonized and impatient population, deluded by mentally ill activist-psychologists, has become tragically obsessed with the defeathering and tearing-apart of these beautiful birds. The sickening history of experimentation that laid the groundwork for these modern deceptions, which includes child mutilation for purposes of research, is also deeply concerning and indicates deep corruption and immorality on the part of psychology’s governing bodies.

The author’s own life experience is proof that this rabbit hole goes even deeper. After attending regular talk therapy for work stress in 2019, the author discovered that some of his LGBTQ orientations, which included open polyamory and closeted bisexual tendencies, were almost completely alleviated and replaced with a strong desire for a wife and a vegetable garden. According to the American Psychological Association’s 2009 Task Force Report on conversion therapy, or therapy intended to change sexual orientation, this is not even possible if that is the point of the therapeutic relationship, let alone by complete accident.

The report also claimed to find “no credible evidence” for the efficacy of such practices, then concluded that people do not face a choice about their sexual orientation and that “affirmative treatments” are the only responsible option, much like was said for transgenderism a decade later. However, this task force seems to have been comprised of six activists in gay rights causes, with not a single actual practitioner of conversion therapy accepted to the committee, nor even a neutral party. Furthermore, their report conveniently dismissed every single paper documenting conversion therapy success as being methodologically flawed, allowing them to say there is no credible evidence while avoiding the inconvenient truth that evidence happens to exist. (Ticket to Heaven by Zachary R.J. Strong, PDF version, p 74-75)

Hrvatski Noahid:
In fact, there are many papers and studies that document the efficacy of conversion therapy, and they seem more reputable than the LGBTQ activists would like to admit. One paper, which accurately described the author’s family dynamic despite being published thirteen years before his birth, found that cognitive psychoanalysis had a 30-50% success rate. Another researcher found that a similar proportion of surveyed homosexuals accessing therapy or pastoral care experienced a change from predominantly homosexual to predominantly heterosexual, and experienced positive changes in their psychological, interpersonal, and spiritual well-being.

Infamously, Robert Spitzer, the man responsible for the revolution of the DSM, published a study with over two hundred former homosexuals who claimed to have been cured through therapy, which he later retracted after criticism from the ideologically captured psychological mainstream.

Between LGBTQ fraud, the Stanford Prison Experiment, the Implicit Association Test, power poses, the collapse of the serotonin theory in depression, further fraud in Alzheimer’s research, and a general “replication crisis” in psychological fields, modern society seems fundamentally confused about many matters of human nature. Zimbardo’s fraud cast a deep cloud of pessimism for decades, its shocking revelations about morality spreading like wildfire. Children are being sterilized, mutilated, lied to, and intentionally confused by deranged adults desperately seeking to legitimize their illnesses. The American Psychological Association has even been implicated in torture of United States prisoners.

This leaves Western society with a deep problem. If many things commonly believed to be true about human nature are fictions, and the scientific bodies involved in perpetrating these lies have been corrupted for decades, then the true nature of human nature is very much an open question to be resolved. Indeed, to paraphrase dissident psychologists specializing in narcissism, most modern Westerners live in a world of flickering images, denied the opportunity of looking in a mirror and seeing their true self.

Despite the rampaging technicolor catastrophe that psychology has degenerated into, there have been many genuinely useful discoveries over the years. Many of the well-known luminaries like Abraham Maslow and Erik Erikson have contributed several important puzzle pieces to our self-understanding and have likely helped keep the Western psyche together despite the pernicious influences from high modernists and their subversive counterparts.

Some other examples of genuine accomplishments include Internal Family Systems, an innovative kind of auto-dialectical therapy that encourages dialogue between disparate “parts” of a person. They also include the wickedly tricky Derren Brown, a hypnotist, mentalist, showman, and stuntman who uses scientific knowledge and advanced psychological techniques to conduct experiments, teach people life lessons, and empower his fellow human beings. (Ticket to Heaven by Zachary R.J. Strong, PDF version, p 75-76)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page