Torah and Jewish Idea > Torah and Jewish Idea

Ticket to Heaven Daily Dose

<< < (16/20) > >>

Hrvatski Noahid:
Sustained use in an indoor environment, and even outdoors, despite gleeful emphasis from public health officials, seems to be of questionable benefit given that they stop spray at best. Indeed, studies that have been performed after the fact indicate no benefits accrued from masking, which means that the extreme measures implemented at schools and hospitals disproportionately harmed children and youth who are not at risk for serious or lethal cases of COVID. The speech impediments, psychological torture, and developmental delays that have cascaded from this obsession are another form of child sacrifice that the West adopted, based entirely on ideas derived from thin simplifications and illiteracy.

The most controversial aspect of the pandemic response, without question, has been the vaccines developed by pharmaceutical companies during Operation Warp Speed. These were flatly and loudly refused by about twenty percent of the North American public, and since the introduction of booster rounds, the general population seems to have lost interest as well. While the mainstream has not questioned the safety or efficacy of the warp speed vaccines, serious allegations of crimes against humanity have been levelled by some Western factions, with politicians making reference to the Nuremberg Code, commissioning investigations into the ethicality of the vaccine, and openly condemning Western leaders like Justin Trudeau for heavy-handed responses to vaccine-related protests.

Furthermore, before and during the deployment of the vaccine, doctors and scientists from around the world called its efficacy and safety into question, including one of the original contributors of mRNA technology, one of the world’s most-published cardiologists, and doctors, nurses, embalmers, and other front-line workers concerned with the things they saw following the introduction of the vaccine into the arms of the public.

The parallel realities occupied by people who follow the mainstream guidance and those who are listening to alternative sources has created some of the starkest political divisions in the West. It has also highlighted the hidden role that industrial science, as opposed to traditional science, plays in Western life, as the weight of the institutionalized and government-funded “experts” was set against folkloric and peer-reviewed networks represented by the signatories of the Great Barrington Declaration, the members of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance and the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, and notable dissenters like Dr. Peter McCullogh, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and even the Nobel Laureate Satoshi Ōmura.

Much like Robert Spitzer altered the course of the West’s metaphysics by elegantly defining mental disorder in a way that conveniently excluded homosexuals, and much like sexism and racism were redefined by Marxists to include notions of systemic power, and much like woman was recently redefined to include transgender women who self-identify as such, the word “vaccine” was redefined by the USA’s Center for Disease Control to mean “protection” instead of “immunity” in September 2021 – shortly before the most aggressive mandates began. (Ticket to Heaven by Zachary R.J. Strong, PDF version, p 86-87)

Hrvatski Noahid:
This kind of language game is just one example of thousands of subtle redefinitions, incomplete perspectives, and half-truths that have been sold to the public under the guise of science to justify the injections. Zero sustained debates have taken place between dissenting thinkers and mainstream experts, with one prominent vaccine advocate refusing to speak to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about the topic on Joe Rogan’s podcast, even with social media influencers putting up over a million dollars for a charity of his choice.

Unfortunately, the journalists responsible for parsing out these truths to the public were either corrupted by Marxist ideas and unwilling to question their own leaders, or scientifically illiterate and had to rely on systemic experts, or both. The public that relies on them, in turn, received anemic analyses of the conversations surrounding the vaccines and remain unaware of many of the genuine controversies that exist about their implementation. Many of the front-line doctors and nurses, particularly in single-payer systems like Canada where there is no option to enter private practice, were browbeat into compliance without the necessary discussions about ethics and consent that are standard in medical practice.

Although it cannot definitively be said that the vaccine was a population control measure, as some of the hardened conspiracy theorists have suggested, it is not clear that the mRNA project has been a net benefit to the West, nor is it clear that ethical procedures were followed during this very expensive and expansive experiment.

Whistleblowers from the clinical trials of the vaccines, which were accelerated from a decade-long process to three months, have revealed ethical and reporting issues with the approval process. Maddie de Garay, a child who was crippled by her side effects seems to have been listed as having “gastrointestinal distress” by Pfizer, a classic pharmaceutical misdirection. Despite repeated assertions that vaccine side effects are rare and minor, a German insurance company’s data suggests that there are significant reporting issues, and national data from Denmark further suggests that the vaccines may even be a net harm. While professionals sound alarms about their findings and are ignored by journalists in favor of the more “authoritative” Western experts, it is becoming starkly obvious to even the most committed modernists that these new “vaccines” do not confer long-lasting immunity, only limited-time protection, something even admitted by vaccine mogul Bill Gates in a 2023 interview. Most have since declined further boosters.

The levels of systemic aggression that were required to pull off these tremendous measures remain invisible to many Westerners, whose experiences of the pandemic were largely focused on economic, psychological, and even physical survival. However, this author, concerned with the fact that Ontario’s data suggested that the chance of myocarditis in teenaged boys was nearly double the chance of death from COVID-19, found himself answering the door to mental health teams and armed police officers in response to questions to public health authorities on the matter. (Ticket to Heaven by Zachary R.J. Strong, PDF version, p 87-88)

Hrvatski Noahid:
After a hunger strike yielded a meeting with an elusive hospital bioethicist, the author discovered his concerns were “powerful” but that the situation involved tremendous bureaucratic pressures. This, in combination with the dozens of pages of documented failure to provide further information upon request, may well constitute a violation of Ontario’s informed consent legislation as well as established medical ethics in the province. However, the fact that there is only one way to practice medicine in Canada, and that way is through government-backed and government-funded institutions, leaves many professionals caught between their desire to help and the harmful realities of the high modernist policies they comply with.

The high modernist ideas and values that drove the West’s COVID-19 response are outlined in a publicly-available book by World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab, who enjoys close relationships with many of the most aggressive pandemic bureaucrats – Jacinda Ahern of New Zealand, Justin Trudeau of Canada, and Emmanuel Macron of France. In his book, ominously called The Great Reset, Schwab essentially proposes taking advantage of the COVID-19 pandemic to instantiate a form of techno-communism on a global scale.

Schwab’s ideology, broadly speaking, is predicated on three core pillars. The first is a recognition that industrial society has had many negative impacts on the natural world as well as the socio-economic situations of many countries. The second is a high modernist assumption that a better-managed and more efficient society can overcome its own structural flaws and achieve sustainability. The third, final, and most Machiavellian pillar is a belief that a global emergency like a pandemic represents the perfect opportunity to make large-scale societal changes in service of this vision.

Although this new global system, which is already being assembled before the eyes of a crisis-weary populace, will never be called communism, it will have all the salient features of the modern Chinese iteration. Specifically, this will include strict ideological conformity, extensive government interference in economic affairs, the concentration of wealth and power into a selective elite, and significantly reduced personal freedoms facilitated by surveillance technology. Elements of this can be seen in the differential treatment for legislators and elites, who enjoy private jet flights to environmental conferences where they eat the finest foods and discuss the necessities of introducing crickets and soy into the diet of the masses. The many pictures of politicians enjoying mask-free social lives while their assistants remain muzzled are similar testaments to the kind of caste system that has assembled itself as a result of systemic policies and Marxist ideas. (Ticket to Heaven by Zachary R.J. Strong, PDF version, p 89)

Hrvatski Noahid:
The next step for the World Economic Forum, and for many Western countries, is the curtailment of personal freedoms in the name of environmental sustainability. Now that large sections of Europeans and North Americans have been conditioned into radical compliance on account of one emergency, the thinking seems to be that the new emergency measures, which already include restrictions on farming in Canada and the Netherlands, will be accepted without sufficient protest. Alongside the reduction of agricultural activity – especially meat production – insect matter is now being introduced to children in schools, as supplements in grocery items, and in other food-like settings. Unfortunately, a deeper investigation of the issue of eating bugs reveals that it comes with many health issues and that having a few backyard chickens would be superior.

Most unfortunately, the “far-right” claim that Marxist elites dream of a society with an underclass who lives in pods, eats bugs, and is watched over by sophisticated technological systems is largely coming true. Schwab’s entire endeavor threatens to be a total usurpation of Western metaphysics, with false narratives about environmental sustainability, nutrition, human nature, and public health being wielded as holy scripture against an undereducated and overmanaged population. Without the inquiry skills, the courage, and the mentorship to research these matters for themselves and realize that the truth is more nuanced than longstanding narratives, most people have no chance – and the elites likely know it.

As can be seen, upon a rigorous examination, modern society proves to be every bit as religious as Europe under the Catholic Church. The modern Western mind, colonized beyond belief, has been raised in an educational and home environment marked by emotional neglect, a lack of true critical thinking, and a crushing lack of autonomy. Fed a steady stream of pablum from mainstream news and other official sources, much of it demonstrably false, biased, or epistemically questionable, large swathes of society live in a dream reinforced by priest-like experts and an incomprehensible mountain of academic and pseudo-academic literature backing their claims.

Nietzsche’s predictions, unfortunately, have come true, as have Maslow’s concerns about the lack of values in human-focused fields like psychology. The Christian ideal, flawed as it was, gave way to the pleasure-pain principle writ large across society, with statues and odes to suffering now ubiquitous across leftist-dominated campuses, the pursuit of happiness exploited to justify unscientific notions about gender and sexuality, obesity and drug epidemics across several Western demographics, and general civil unrest marked by unprecedented levels of violence in many North American cities.

Although a Westerner familiar with media ecology and conspiracy theories may point to the unrelenting messages about consumption, credential acquisition, and traditional success as a corruption of what people want, the truth is that the rot in Western values lies much deeper. As might be said by dissident psychiatrist Alone, the correction that must be made is in how the wanting is done, which is a function of human self-conception and public understanding of what makes humans healthy and happy. Rooting the problem in metaphysics will serve to illuminate the true challenges facing Nietzsche’s hypothetical overman, as well as the nihilistic and decadent society “he” is meant to represent. (Ticket to Heaven by Zachary R.J. Strong, PDF version, p 89-90)

Hrvatski Noahid:
Aside from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, one of the most famous critics of the Soviet system was Ayn Rand, who emigrated to America in the early twentieth century and became one of the most influential philosophers of her generation. One of the focuses of her work, which she saw as a continuation of the Romantic tradition, emphasized humankind’s free will and our ability to choose values, to work towards them, and to gain satisfaction from achieving those goals. The position that she took in her opus, which seemed bombastic or exaggerated to many until recently, was that anybody who even remotely espoused leftist and collectivist ideals was a villainous looter who refused to take part in the rational process of valuation and productive labor.

The heart of the issue, to Rand, was a metaphysical and ethical one. The looters in her stories wanted to deny reality and expected others to pick up the tab – much like the collectivist neo-Marxists are expecting society to do now. By denying reality, Rand said that they were attempting to steal from other people and exploit their good faith. The righteous person, in Rand’s philosophical framework, can be described as a trader, an inventor, a laborer, an artist, and an intellectual to whatever degree they are able – vocations that are often idealized or featured in her work.

Additionally, Rand’s diagnosis of Marxists remains that they were afraid of being individuals, which caused them to conform radically to outlandish and irresponsible ideas. Indeed, in the overstructured and colonized environment many Western children inhabit, lacking sufficient developmental supports in childhood and the kinds of life coaching only available to wealthy elites, it can be difficult to explore one’s own values, develop a consistent philosophy by which to live life, and develop a plan to work towards those goals and values.

Underlying Rand’s ideas is a belief in a definite and knowable reality, a product of the Enlightenment and scientific project she championed in her work. This stood in stark contrast to the postmodernist position, which holds that reality is socially constructed and nobody can ever know anything objectively. In such a subjective and quicksilver-like world, one’s ability to get their needs met is not based on productive labor, which would implicitly require interactions with reality and a consistent philosophy to support them, but rather one’s ability to manipulate others into meeting their needs.

This is the fundamental mindset behind Marxism, which rejects the outright competition of the free market and replaces it with social competition based on conformity to increasingly complexified values. This is also the key driver behind the continual expansion of the queer demographic to include disturbingly specific sub-identities such as the ampukodo, someone who believes they are a child amputee. Failure to adhere to social conventions when addressing such demographics results in expulsion from the group, akin to the Soviet gulag treatment or the public confessions favored by the Chinese communists. (Ticket to Heaven by Zachary R.J. Strong, PDF version, p 91)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page