JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Trumpeldor on November 18, 2007, 05:57:54 AM
-
He looked pretty good, for a Democrat.
-
Of course, being that he is a Democrat, I think his honesty always has to be questioned. That said, I thought he seemed pretty good also. I was thinking of asking a question on this forum that if we absolutely HAD to vote for ANY of the Democrats, which would you prefer. I would pick Biden.
-
Of course, being that he is a Democrat, I think his honesty always has to be questioned. That said, I thought he seemed pretty good also. I was thinking of asking a question on this forum that if we absolutely HAD to vote for ANY of the Democrats, which would you prefer. I would pick Biden.
I think he can talk tough to Iran if he had too.
-
I think he can talk tough to Iran if he had too.
He voted against a non-binding resolution that declared the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization. Usually he's a little better than the other presidential candidates. I guess he was scared to stick to his principle in that vote and desperately wanted to appease the far-left a little in his attempt to try and do well in the Iowa Caucuses
He has the most experience of the Democrat candidates and I think they know that. Most of the candidates stated at least once, "I agree with Senator Biden..." "I agree with Senator Biden..." etc. He made an advertisement highlighting those quotes of the other Democrat candidates agreeing with him on what he said during the debate.
-
The last debate was rigged:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,311986,00.html
Hillary claimed that Edwards wasn't supportive of "universal health-care in 2004."
During the debate, when Edwards stated that Hillary accepts more campaign funding from corporations in comparison to any of the Republican candidates, the pro-Hillary crowd booed him. They were denial of the truth of would get angry at any criticism of Hillary.
From that article:
"In the meantime, Hillary used the debate to spin her platitudes. One of them was a peon against unsafe toys. “We shouldn't permit the import of unsafe toys,” she said in the debate. But her chief strategist, Mark Penn, is the CEO of Burson-Marsteller, the PR company that represents Aquadots, the company that makes the bead toys with an adhesive coating that turns into the date rape drug when children suck on it. Penn is paid by Burson based on a percentage of their profits, and Aquadots is an important contributor to their bottom line. But neither Blitzer nor any of Hillary's Democratic opponents were alert enough to call the conflict into question."
-
I think he can talk tough to Iran if he had too.
He voted against a non-binding resolution that declared the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization. Usually he's a little better than the other presidential candidates. I guess he was scared to stick to his principle in that vote and desperately wanted to appease the far-left a little in his attempt to try and do well in the Iowa Caucuses
That is true.
Does anyone know what his overall policy on Iran is?
-
yet another unqualified rat