JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on November 28, 2007, 03:48:14 PM
-
This poll was inspired by recent conversations with Gruzinit. Gruzinit is concerned because the population of Third Worlders is exploding all over the world and most Western nations are experiencing negative growth or staying at the same level. She feels the answer is to encourage Westerners to have more kids, but the simple fact is that civilized people will NEVER beat cats and dogs at their own game.
My alternative, which I think is more workable, would be for Western governments to offer some sum to Third Worlders (100 dollars? 100 euros?), voluntarily, to Third World citizens for them to get sterilized. Perhaps we could offer a big bonus to Third Worlders who get sterilized before they have any children.
Obviously the PC whores that run all Western nations wouldn't touch this proposal with a twenty-foot poll, but I think more than a few Western citizens would support this. Do you think Kahanism should try to implement this idea? I do.
Chaimfan
-
To hell with paying them. Doctor up the water and food aid. I'm sure you could spray something on them from the air, too.
-
You're looking at this in the wrong way.
Why should we care how many kids these people fart out in their own countries? The fact is, we need to stop all Third World immigration ASAP. We need a huge fence on all our borders. We need to do away with foreign aid, anchor baby citizenship, and we need the Supreme Court to overturn Plyler vs. Doe (the decision which allowed illegals to get free public schooling).
-
Newman--I certainly agree with you in spirit, but do remember that we are progressive and care about civil rights. :D
-
Lisa, btw, what is the Supreme Court's reasoning that illegals must get free schooling and healthcare?
-
Here Chaimfan:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plyler_v._Doe
http://www.americanpatrol.com/REFERENCE/PlylerVDoeSummary.html
-
You're looking at this in the wrong way.
Why should we care how many kids these people fart out in their own countries? The fact is, we need to stop all Third World immigration ASAP. We need a huge fence on all our borders. We need to do away with foreign aid, anchor baby citizenship, and we need the Supreme Court to overturn Plyler vs. Doe (the decision which allowed illegals to get free public schooling).
I endorse all measures preventing tirdworldies to be born or to migrate to the west!
-
I agree 100% CF
Money well spent.....if I could add that the ones who come from sharia infested islamic swamps have their vasectomies preformed like they like to torture the little girls....with a rusty blade, no anaesthetic and done by some half blind old bat from the village O0
These dolts would line up for cash not even knowing what vasectomy meant :laugh:
-
Yes. It should be focused on the Islamic nations though, and the blacks.
-
That's because thanks to our wonderful technology we discovered abortion and birth control
-
What the hell is wrong with you guys? Wonderful technology? For one abortion is destruction of life. Birth control was made by a damn Nazi, wonderful technology eh?
I only see Liberalism in this thread.
-
What the hell is wrong with you guys? Wonderful technology? For one abortion is destruction of life. Birth control was made by a damn Nazi, wonderful technology eh?
I only see Liberalism in this thread.
He was being sarcastic
-
Newman--I certainly agree with you in spirit, but do remember that we are progressive and care about civil rights. :D
That's right. Chaim ben Pesach and his merry band of bleeding hearts! :::D
-
Too little, too late.
-
I don't believe in paying them at all, the methods used here in Australia for the feral animal problem would work lovely for the third world.
-
Too little, too late.
Well said.
-
To hell with paying them. Doctor up the water and food aid. I'm sure you could spray something on them from the air, too.
That's murder!!! The only case I would agree to spray from the air, would be to erase terrorists from EY, after several warnings for civilians to voluntarily leave the area.
Would yo kill me for living in Argentina, then?
-
To hell with paying them. Doctor up the water and food aid. I'm sure you could spray something on them from the air, too.
That's murder!!! The only case I would agree to spray from the air, would be to erase terrorists from EY, after several warnings for civilians to voluntarily leave the area.
Would yo kill me for living in Argentina, then?
I meant spray something that makes them infertile.
Argentines should only be killed if they try stealing the Falkland Islands again.
-
Argentines should only be killed if they try stealing the Falkland Islands again.
Well, since I support Amerindians, I must obviously say the Falkand are British. Patagonia was a free Amerindian territory at the time the Brirish arrived in Falkland, and Ameridians certainly never claimed the Falkland. So anyone who claims the Falkland are Argentinian for being in front of the Patagonian coast is also supporting the Amerindian genocide.
BTW, whereas the Islanders don't have the right to vote in British elections they cannot be blamed for denying Israel's rights on EY. If just abortion were forbidden by the Falkland the local govt....They would be recognised by Let-be-land's Constitution. Do you know if local Falkalnds laws protects the unborn?
-
Two separate claims that came up:
1: Argentines aren't Third Worlders (at least not historically). Most Argentines are the descendants of white Europeans.
2: I do think Argentina is right on the subject of the Malvinas. Historically they were Argentine and Britain forcibly conquered them in the 1800s.
-
Two separate claims that came up:
1: Argentines aren't Third Worlders (at least not historically). Most Argentines are the descendants of white Europeans.
2: I do think Argentina is right on the subject of the Malvinas. Historically they were Argentine and Britain forcibly conquered them in the 1800s.
Too bad.
The anglo-american empire owns the oceans and everything in them. Banana dictatorships get what we allow them to have.
-
Two separate claims that came up:
1: Argentines aren't Third Worlders (at least not historically). Most Argentines are the descendants of white Europeans.
2: I do think Argentina is right on the subject of the Malvinas. Historically they were Argentine and Britain forcibly conquered them in the 1800s.
1- I dislike the idea of defending white Europeans' superiority, even when when I am descendant of them. I don'r claim to be superior.
2- The Falkalnd were disputed by Britain and Spain in the past. Argentinians considered the Patagonia to a be part of Argentina, (even when it was not already conquered, and Amerindians were still free there), so they considered the Islands belonged to Argentina. But the Falkland were never inhabitted until the ancestors of the Islanders arrived. In 1929 Arrgentina had no Govt. The Governor of Buenos Aires province sent a military force to keep them, but never a permanent population. So they belong to the Islanders who came after the British occupied them in 1833. And if they choose the British Govt. it's up to them.
Argentine ties to the Falkland are as fake as Palis ties to Eretz Israel
-
The anglo-american empire owns the oceans and everything in them. Banana dictatorships get what we allow them to have.
The Oceans are free. No Empire has the right over the world!!! But the Islanders have decided the Falkland are British...and so it must be!!!!!!
-
The anglo-american empire owns the oceans and everything in them. Banana dictatorships get what we allow them to have.
The Oceans are free. No Empire has the right over the world!!! But the Islanders have decided the Falkland are British...and so it must be!!!!!!
The anglo-saxons won the right to rule the oceans. The French and Spanish tried and failed.We win, They lose!
-
The anglo-american empire owns the oceans and everything in them. Banana dictatorships get what we allow them to have.
The Oceans are free. No Empire has the right over the world!!! But the Islanders have decided the Falkland are British...and so it must be!!!!!!
The anglo-saxons won the right to rule the oceans. The French and Spanish tried and failed.We win, They lose!
The British were mostly pirates and slave traders at that time. Are you Morgan?
And the Spaniards were the same evil. They came here to steal, they bought slaves, and they made a treaty with Portugal to divide ALL non-Christian lands of the world among themselves!!!!! Tordesillas Treaty!
Both the same evil!
But the Falklanders arrived in a desert Islands and can be considered natives! So they can choose which country they wish to belong to. And they have chosen Britain!
-
The anglo-american empire owns the oceans and everything in them. Banana dictatorships get what we allow them to have.
Did you not read when I showed you that Argentina historically has been a white European nation like South Africa and its Boers?
-
The anglo-american empire owns the oceans and everything in them. Banana dictatorships get what we allow them to have.
Did you not read when I showed you that Argentina historically has been a white European nation like South Africa and its Boers?
Yes, but they don't get the Falklands without permission. Anglos own them and everything else in the ocean.
-
Yes, but they don't get the Falklands without permission. Anglos own them and everything else in the ocean.
That's just nonsense. Are you joking? And there a lot of posts here that seem to be joke!!!!!
I was being serious. I am Argentinian ( Italian besides), but say the Falkland are British.
Anglos owners of the oceans?????? A joke?????? Come on. Is this a comic Show?
-
Yes, but they don't get the Falklands without permission. Anglos own them and everything else in the ocean.
That's just nonsense. Are you joking? And there a lot of posts here that seem to be joke!!!!!
I was being serious. I am Argentinian ( Italian besides), but say the Falkland are British.
Anglos owners of the oceans?????? A joke?????? Come on. Is this a comic Show?
Yes. The Royal Navy earned the right for the Britons to be masters of the oceans. Now Britain's daughter nation, the USA has taken that mantle. This would not be so if G-D himself had not chosen the anglos to rule the oceans.
-
USA is not Britain. It's not even in the Comowealth.
-
USA is not Britain. It's not even in the Comowealth.
But it's a 'Daughter Nation'. It's constitution is based on British Common Law. It's language and traditions are British.
Ever heard of the Anglo-American Empire?
-
USA is not Britain. It's not even in the Comowealth.
But it's a 'Daughter Nation'. It's constitution is based on British Common Law. It's language and traditions are British.
Ever heard of the Anglo-American Empire?
Yes, I heard of it. I've read about it only in pro-Arabs newspapers. They say Anglo-American Empire invented Israel. haha. Pure Arab socialists stupidities.
-
USA is not Britain. It's not even in the Comowealth.
But it's a 'Daughter Nation'. It's constitution is based on British Common Law. It's language and traditions are British.
Ever heard of the Anglo-American Empire?
Yes, I heard of it. I've read about it only in pro-Arabs newspapers. They say Anglo-American Empire invented Israel. haha. Pure Arab socialists stupidities.
Arabs didn't invent it. It was a concept of Winston Churchill's. It's a reality in practice.
-
It may be a reality only because USA and Britain are the strongest countries in NATO. Now I miss those times......if only Israel had taken the chance to wipe out out Palis during the Cold War........
-
It may be a reality only because USA and Britain are the strongest countries in NATO. Now I miss those times......if only Israel had taken the chance to wipe out out Palis during the Cold War........
The cold war was very stabilising in hindsight. With any luck we'll have another one with China.
-
Do you guys not notice how much you guys sound like StørmFrønt?
-
Do you guys not notice how much you guys sound like StørmFrønt?
Are you still hanging around like an egg fart?
Quite clearly, the words 'racist' and 'racism' CANNOT be used to describe JTF, JTF policy or Kahanist ideology..The very definitions of these words center on race, not culture.
There are NO attacks on races at JTF. The attacks are on bad culture, NOT bad race.
JTF attacks evil and evil cultures REGARDLESS of race. JTF's attacks on WHITE european anti-semites and self-hating JEWS have been far greater in number and more vitriolic than any criticism of the cultures of any non-whites
To not speak out against evil because of Orwellian political correctness (as advocated by liberals) is evil in itself.
The hatred we have for evil cultures at JTF is based on their evil actions and stated goals.
The black, arab and mexican cultures are cultures of hate, envy, sloth, criminality and anti-semitism (this is based on research, statistics and emperical evidence- NOT prejudice). That is why we hate those cultures.The physical characteristics of these people (whilst commented on, occasionally) has NOTHING to do with our dislike of, opposition to or criticism of their cultures.
-
Do you guys not notice how much you guys sound like StørmFrønt?
Really? ^-^