JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: MasterWolf1 on December 07, 2007, 01:01:38 AM
-
http://www.mikehuckabee.com/?FuseAction=Issues.View&Issue_id=3
-
Thanks for the link MasterWolf1 ;) , he looks good on Israel but we'll hear what the others have to say.
-
If he's sincere that is...
-
http://www.mikehuckabee.com/?FuseAction=Issues.View&Issue_id=3
How is that any different to the rhetoric of other candidates?
-
http://www.mikehuckabee.com/?FuseAction=Issues.View&Issue_id=3
How is that any different to the rhetoric of other candidates?
It's much different he is the only candidate that does not support giving up land for peace. Other candidates like Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani support land for peace if certain conditionals are met.
-
It's much different he is the only candidate that does not support giving up land for peace. Other candidates like Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani support land for peace if certain conditionals are met.
Huckabee would either need to re-structure the state department--eliminating it would be more preferable-- or show leadership by standing up to it.
-
Why would it be good to get rid of the state dept??
-
Why would it be good to get rid of the state dept??
The CFR gives the impression of being a think-tank. But the structure of the state department is designed that CFR policies get adopted as state department policies. No other "think-tank" has power like that. A lot of the employees within the state department are also career CFR members/employees.
Don't you think the Heritage Foundation would like to see government employees listen to them more often?