JTF.ORG Forum

Save Western Civilization => Save America => Topic started by: mord on November 20, 2006, 02:12:56 PM

Title: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: mord on November 20, 2006, 02:12:56 PM
http://us.video.aol.com/video.index.adp?mode=1&pmmsid=1772645
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: Yochanan Zev on November 20, 2006, 02:44:25 PM
How much did you enjoy watching this??  Really?

Now don't start with all that UnPC, reverse racism shyt.  You know the type of response in the fashion of Pee Wee Herman, "I know you are but what am I?"

What's missing from the beginning of this clip is where whe prefaces the monologue with " This is dedicated to all of our proud men and women overseas who are defending our American freedom over in Iraq."

Cosmo Krammer for President 2008!

Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: wonderfulgoy on November 20, 2006, 03:55:01 PM
I once went into the shops in town only to see posters of black men with white women, black male mannikins with white female ones, white girls carrying black dolls, and their white mothers singing along to black music.  All the while 50 Cent posters under which blonde female employees were stacking shelves.  I got lots of funny looks.  They were all like, 'What's this filthy piece of garbage doing here, interupting our pilgrimmage to our beloved negro?'

I was a white man and condemned on that account.

White women prefer black men.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: Yochanan Zev on November 20, 2006, 05:00:37 PM
Here in DC, I've met/encountered many black women who will only date white Jewish men.  It seems that usually very dark skinned and wear their hair in long braids.  It's my guess that must be a "look" that white Jewish men find attractive.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: mord on November 20, 2006, 08:13:56 PM
Do they look like Halle Berry?
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: wonderfulgoy on November 21, 2006, 08:29:18 AM
Here in DC, I've met/encountered many black women who will only date white Jewish men.  It seems that usually very dark skinned and wear their hair in long braids.  It's my guess that must be a "look" that white Jewish men find attractive.



Yes I have noticed that myself.  I met such a one before, I couldn't stop staring at her as I walked past, and she gave me a big warm smile.  Which was nice because 9 out of 10 black women usually just scowl at white guys.   :-*
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: MarZutra on November 21, 2006, 10:04:05 AM
Shalom, that is nice to see but I'll stick to looking for a Jewish White Woman.  On the topic of Michael Richards, one never hears what set him off on his rant.  Did the blacks in the audience slur him with racial remarks like "honkey" or "cracker"?  One never hears any complaints when black comedians; Dave Shapelle, Chris Rock, black politicians; Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson calling for the extermination of Ol-Whitey or the Jews or the masses of black rappers who debase Whites constantly?  If Richards were black and the hecklers in the audience were white this would never have seen the light of day.  In fact I'll go further, Good for Richards! It is about time whites spoke out against black filth that infects our society with crime, drugs, rape, murder and every other aspect of inhumanity.  Not all blacks are bad but the fact that in 400 years most cannot speak English, blame Ol-Whitey or the Jew for their own situations, even while continually getting mass billions for social programs promoting morality, economic "Affirmative Action" and even continual Marxist wealth transfer externally in "foreign aid" to their brethren in Africa....with results being less then admirable....blame ol-whitey?  I don't hate blacks, I hate ignorance and closed mindedness....  A Black woman debated me and called me a degenerate because I stated fact that she didn't believe too that she insulted me when I told her that Martin L. King Jr. was a Communist, which she didn't believe....  Enough is enough...  You don't see black WANTING to go to Africa and help their own but you do see them continually blaming all others for their inability to progress....
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: Yochanan Zev on November 21, 2006, 12:21:17 PM
Quote
If Richards were black and the hecklers in the audience were white this would never have seen the light of day.  In fact I'll go further, Good for Richards! It is about time whites spoke out against black filth that infects our society with crime, drugs, rape, murder and every other aspect of inhumanity.

You tell'em Pee Wee.  Would it had made any difference to you if Mel Gibson were black?  Would you still be using the same ole tired "Blacks get away with this, Jesse Jackson  that.." argument?

When has Chris Rock or Dave Chappelle attacked a white person in the audience with racial slurs?

I don't have whites.  I just hate phonies.  If you like what Michael Richards did, just admit it and spare us the BS.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: Scriabin on November 21, 2006, 12:37:52 PM
Quote
If Richards were black and the hecklers in the audience were white this would never have seen the light of day.  In fact I'll go further, Good for Richards! It is about time whites spoke out against black filth that infects our society with crime, drugs, rape, murder and every other aspect of inhumanity.

You tell'em Pee Wee.  Would it had made any difference to you if Mel Gibson were black?  Would you still be using the same ole tired "Blacks get away with this, Jesse Jackson  that.." argument?

When has Chris Rock or Dave Chappelle attacked a white person in the audience with racial slurs?

I don't have whites.  I just hate phonies.  If you like what Michael Richards did, just admit it and spare us the BS.

Chapelle and Rock don't need to attack audience members with racial slurs, they constantly do it in their routines.  Nearly every sketch on Chapelle's show rips on whites while attempting to make blacks look good.

Of course what Richards did was fine.  Was there any blood shed?  Was anyone killed? 

My point is that whites need to stop being afraid of offending blacks.  I applaud Michael Richards.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: MassuhDGoodName on November 21, 2006, 03:43:43 PM
MassuhDGoodName says:...

Those folks in that club "just ain't got no upbringin'!

Anyone heckling a performer onstage should have been immediately removed from the premises and barred from ever returning.

And; anyone spewing filth of anykind, be it hatred, race-baiting, or other, should also have been immediately removed from the premises and barred from ever returning.

A comedian who is unable to respond to a heckler without resorting to filth and hatred (1) is no comedian; and (2) has no business in the entertainment industry.

It's tragically sad to see just what a low, degenerative state the U.S.A. is undergoing.

The truth is that Ha'Shem created our racial differences and also made each race aware of the others' different characteristics for a purpose; and that purpose is not for us to hate each other.

Trash is Trash, whatever the race or ethnicity; Righteousness and uprightness are not the exclusive characteristic of any one race or people.

People choose to be what they are.

Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: fjack on November 21, 2006, 05:24:01 PM
If you listen to the whole tape, the darkies where screaming cracker, craker. At first when I heard Richards, I said to mysefl what a mensch. When I watched the news this morning and saw him bowing to that self hating jew seinfeld, I said he is nothing more that a coward. Who made the word [censored] so sacred? The primitives call themselves that all the time. We all know by being brain washed by black history month that these primtives are super intellegent that they must be right. So [censored] sounds good to me.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: LeChayim on November 21, 2006, 05:34:10 PM
It's not possible to say whether Richards was wrong for his rant. Marzutra is right. We need to know the context. And we probably never will.

Like Chaim often points out, we have the right to fight back when certain segments (be they Blacks, Arabs, or even Jewish leftists) try to harm us. We have a right to point out that so many Blacks are robbing and raping Whites. We have a right to protest racist Affirmative Action policies. We can speak out against Black leaders and their followers who attack Jews, and encourage and celebrate the murder of Jews. And In Richards' case, he has the right to fight back if the guy called him a cracker, or said he had no talent, 'cause he's White.

But let's assume for the moment that Richards was not provoked.

I can't say it's OK to attack Blacks just because they're Black. Never mind that it's wrong (we can argue about that forever), but it's just plain dumb. Also it's no different than those who hate Jews because we're Jews.

What if a Black man chooses to be a Righteous Gentile, and observe the seven Hoahite Laws, and worship the G-d of Israel, and stand in support of G-d's People? You cannot attack such a person because his skin is black.

As far as dating Black women: If you prefer White women over Black women there's nothing racist about it. It's no different than finding blondes more attractive than brunettes. On the other hand, there's nothing wrong with a White Jewish man dating a Black Jewish woman (I would), and vice versa.

By the way...

Whatever you think about Richards, watch over the next few weeks, and compare how he gets treated with how Mel Gibson was treated. And remember, Richards was yelling in a fit of anger, and probably didn't mean what he said. Gibson got drunk and said what he meant (but had never dared say when he was sober).
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: MarZutra on November 21, 2006, 05:36:50 PM
Quote

Chapelle and Rock don't need to attack audience members with racial slurs, they constantly do it in their routines.  Nearly every sketch on Chapelle's show rips on whites while attempting to make blacks look good.

Of course what Richards did was fine.  Was there any blood shed?  Was anyone killed? 

My point is that whites need to stop being afraid of offending blacks.  I applaud Michael Richards.
Quote

I agree with you 100% i'm tired of hearing all the bad things the evil Imperialist Ol-Whitey had done while never does one look at the good things.  Perhaps blacks might wish to return to Africa so they can compare?  I'll bet the Ol-Whities here will treat them much better than their black brethren there. 
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: Scriabin on November 21, 2006, 05:45:12 PM
Quote

Chapelle and Rock don't need to attack audience members with racial slurs, they constantly do it in their routines.  Nearly every sketch on Chapelle's show rips on whites while attempting to make blacks look good.

Of course what Richards did was fine.  Was there any blood shed?  Was anyone killed? 

My point is that whites need to stop being afraid of offending blacks.  I applaud Michael Richards.
Quote

I agree with you 100% i'm tired of hearing all the bad things the evil Imperialist Ol-Whitey had done while never does one look at the good things.  Perhaps blacks might wish to return to Africa so they can compare?  I'll bet the Ol-Whities here will treat them much better than their black brethren there. 

And the whites treat them a lot better than the Mexicans will when they take over.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: GentileLady on November 21, 2006, 05:49:55 PM
Quote
White women prefer black men.

That's a pretty broad brush....SOME white women prefer black men, not all.  

Character and intellect are the attributes I find most attractive.  The physical characteristics are much less important....after all, they are fleeting, temporary......gone in a heartbeat with death, gone as a result of disease or disfiguring accident.  Men may look more to physical attributes, women much less so.  Physical attributes alone do not provide a solid basis for a relationship....some would go so far as to say they are unimportant.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: MarZutra on November 21, 2006, 06:02:29 PM
Now that is so true Gentile Lady.  You are correct there.  I feel that this "shvartzism" has everything to do with media and politically directed Marxist disinformation to pressure white women to "embrace diversity" or towards "multiculturalism" to the point that if that woman has any pride, self respect or any admiration towards her heritage she is labelled a "racist" and isolatied especially within Academia.  I find it so repulsive that problack is admiralble, to the point of re-writing history to make blacks even more "cool" but if a white holds any self pride....Nazi!  You sound inteligent.  Kol Hakovod and welcome... 
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: GentileLady on November 21, 2006, 08:18:06 PM
Thank You, Marzutra.  I do feel welcome here....and I will try to contribute to discussions, as well as learn. 
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: MarZutra on November 22, 2006, 07:03:38 AM
Thank You, Marzutra.  I do feel welcome here....and I will try to contribute to discussions, as well as learn. 
You are most welcome.  Here people say what they wish and it is debated, some agree some don't but most who make any statements whatsoever have the facts ready to support them and too suggest books, readings etc.  It is not a site where one spews hatred and filth but one that tries to dispell all the disinformation brainwashing righteous Jews and righteous Gentiles causing their dumbing down, closed mindedness, intolerance and total hatred for themselves.  This is what Liberalism/Socialism/Humanism/Marxism/Communism and subsequently Islam has brought....ignorance.  Personally I feel that if Michael Richards was black and those hooligans making trouble were white, there would be no fuss only two beaten up or murdered whites.  It is sad when Black leaders; Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan can state publically "Whites are Devils and should be exterminated" or worse.  Rap music attacks women down to the lowest, advocates racism, sexism, drugs, crime and murder yet nothing is said let alone done...  Chris rock can say he hates "crackers" and "white muthafakas" all evening and nothing is said nor done.  Double standards or just immense dumbing down of Ol-whitey?  Yes what Richards did was, is some cases, wrong....but so was slavery.  If slavery had never happened, just think how different the entire civilized world would be.  Has nothing to do with bigotry just fact.  Question: As a woman are you not offended at Rap/Hip-Hop "music" that paints women as whores to be used and dumped off like a piece of dirty clothing?  I often ask myself why a woman, because a White Male cannot do it, doesn't go to a shrink and tell him that she is having a very hard time coping with life because everywhere she looks she sees gutter trash and hears this rap "music" treating women like animals.  After the woman's situation is filed with the shrink and she is put on medication, probably paxil for depression, she can go to any creditable attorney who would take the case pro-bono.  She'd list as many black...and those few white...rappers, black record labels, black radio stations, movie/production studios, nightclubs, comedians, black racist politicians...virtually any person or establishment spewing this hate filled degeneracy for a million to 10 million each.  It would be in the news, ALL would settle out of court.  The woman would be worth a hundrend million in a year or so and the entire Black society would be vanquished from their continual hate mongering via "music" or other "black urban" culture...  just posing a question. Kol tov Baruch HaShem
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: Alex on November 22, 2006, 08:02:58 AM
Quote
If Richards were black and the hecklers in the audience were white this would never have seen the light of day.  In fact I'll go further, Good for Richards! It is about time whites spoke out against black filth that infects our society with crime, drugs, rape, murder and every other aspect of inhumanity.

You tell'em Pee Wee.  Would it had made any difference to you if Mel Gibson were black?  Would you still be using the same ole tired "Blacks get away with this, Jesse Jackson  that.." argument?

When has Chris Rock or Dave Chappelle attacked a white person in the audience with racial slurs?

I don't have whites.  I just hate phonies.  If you like what Michael Richards did, just admit it and spare us the BS.

Chapelle and Rock don't need to attack audience members with racial slurs, they constantly do it in their routines.  Nearly every sketch on Chapelle's show rips on whites while attempting to make blacks look good.

Of course what Richards did was fine.  Was there any blood shed?  Was anyone killed? 

My point is that whites need to stop being afraid of offending blacks.  I applaud Michael Richards.

From what I've seen, Dave Chapelle has made fun of shvartzas. That doesn't mean that he doesn't criticize whites. But at least he points out the problems of blacks here in America.

Here is a video of Chris Rock criticizing niggers. Please, pardon the vulgarity. http://youtube.com/watch?v=_q8LxO4wnCQ

For some reason, I had trouble posting the link to the video and replacing the URL address with the text "Here is a video". Odd...
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: GentileLady on November 22, 2006, 08:07:32 AM
As to your question........

I understand the sentiment, but as an atty, I can tell you that offensive "speech" alone is not actionable.  Is it reprehensible, disgusting, degrading, demoralizing?  Yes.  Actionable?  No.

I ignore it and refuse to allow it to degrade my sense of self-worth....or that of my daughter.  AND, I refuse to allow Rap-Crap in my home.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: MarZutra on November 22, 2006, 08:34:04 AM
I agree with you 100%.  I have also seen Chris Rock go on a rant for about 5 minutes within one of his "comedy" sketches attacking "Crackers" saying that he doesn’t' discriminate and hates all "white cracka muthafakas" on and on.  This is comedy?  What really is the difference if one says it and means it in a "comical" way when compared to another who was, probably attacked verbally by racial slurs, and defended himself speaking his mind.  Both are what they happen to "feel" and "believe" the only differences are being that one is "comedy" without hooligans verbally abusing him and the other is anger with hooligans verbally abusing him?  Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson needs their head examined because those two are filthy animals and in no way comparable to good Black men like Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson.  I know most blacks despise whites and Jews even worse.  That is a given.  I can understand and deal with it but if it is really that bad living under or amongst Whites ..please, I invite them to "make Aliyah" back to Africa and truly show their admiration for their blackness and their African part of their "Americanism".  As a matter of fact, I'd rather see my tax dollars going to that instead of the billions wasted in "elevation" programs, racial discrimination "Affirmative Action" programs or Marxist Wealth Transfer programs via: Welfare or Foreign Aid.  At least one would actually see their tax dollars at work. ;)
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: davkakach on November 22, 2006, 12:21:15 PM
Quote
If Richards were black and the hecklers in the audience were white this would never have seen the light of day.  In fact I'll go further, Good for Richards! It is about time whites spoke out against black filth that infects our society with crime, drugs, rape, murder and every other aspect of inhumanity.

You tell'em Pee Wee.  Would it had made any difference to you if Mel Gibson were black?  Would you still be using the same ole tired "Blacks get away with this, Jesse Jackson  that.." argument?

When has Chris Rock or Dave Chappelle attacked a white person in the audience with racial slurs?

I don't have whites.  I just hate phonies.  If you like what Michael Richards did, just admit it and spare us the BS.

Chapelle and Rock don't need to attack audience members with racial slurs, they constantly do it in their routines.  Nearly every sketch on Chapelle's show rips on whites while attempting to make blacks look good.

Of course what Richards did was fine.  Was there any blood shed?  Was anyone killed? 

My point is that whites need to stop being afraid of offending blacks.  I applaud Michael Richards.
Michael Richards lost his cool.  He was not professional, and it wasn't part of his act.  All the [censored] he tried to sell to the media later, about his being a performer and improvising---that's a load of pathetic crap.  I think Richards he was justified in humiliating the black heckler, simply because that negro shouldn't have heckled Richards in the first place.  Enough indeed with white guilt.  Negroes that deserve credit for behaving like human beings, as opposed to beasts, will get the credit.  Those that don't---shouldn't be surprised when they are called [censored]-ers by angry whites.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: Yochanan Zev on November 22, 2006, 02:00:34 PM
As if there is some difference between calling a black man a niqqer to his face as opposed to saying it behind his back?

I can see that some of you really get off on dehumanizing black people.  I would even bet money that those of you who do actually get a "boost" from doing it, thus the constant obsession with black people and their affairs.

You probably have black-on-white porn from the internet present on your hard drive as we speak.
 >:(
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: fjack on November 22, 2006, 02:53:06 PM
Richards should be held up as a hero. It is unfortunate that he had to bow down and take back his comments. What are blacks doing seeing a white comic anyway? They should be at a rap contest or car jacking. These blacks are a disgrace to their race. Why were these blacks not selling crack to their owm people, why weren't they pimping the mothers and sisters, and why were they not doing drive by shootings. The aforementioned would have been a more typical black activity then seeing a white comic.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: davkakach on November 22, 2006, 04:15:32 PM
As if there is some difference between calling a black man a niqqer to his face as opposed to saying it behind his back?

I can see that some of you really get off on dehumanizing black people.  I would even bet money that those of you who do actually get a "boost" from doing it, thus the constant obsession with black people and their affairs.

You probably have black-on-white porn from the internet present on your hard drive as we speak.
 >:(
:P
"constant obsession with black people"?!  I think it's the other way around.  It's black people who are obsessed with white people, whether it is black women who want to look like white women, or black youth who spend hours listening to lyrics about killing whitey and the POlice, and about how everything is whitey's fault and how they deserve reparations.

JTF is a civil rights organization---it does not voice opposition to blacks' skin color, which would be racist, but to the prevailing black culture (which glorifies and celebrates all the wrong things while ridiculing and discouraging all the good things), out of which miracuously emerged relatively decent people like Alan Keyes, Clarence Thomas, Bill Cosby and Chris Rock.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: TheCoon on November 22, 2006, 05:11:32 PM
As if there is some difference between calling a black man a niqqer to his face as opposed to saying it behind his back?

I can see that some of you really get off on dehumanizing black people.  I would even bet money that those of you who do actually get a "boost" from doing it, thus the constant obsession with black people and their affairs.

You probably have black-on-white porn from the internet present on your hard drive as we speak.
 >:(

I actually prefer white on black porn, j/k. ;)

Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: Joe Gutfeld on November 22, 2006, 05:36:51 PM
Kramer is the worst and anyone who still watches the show is a dope. 
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: TheCoon on November 22, 2006, 06:47:33 PM
Al Sharpton is getting in on this saying that Richards needs to start reconciliation and stopping racism all over America.

 :D :D :D
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: MarZutra on November 22, 2006, 10:33:48 PM
As if there is some difference between calling a black man a niqqer to his face as opposed to saying it behind his back?

I can see that some of you really get off on dehumanizing black people.  I would even bet money that those of you who do actually get a "boost" from doing it, thus the constant obsession with black people and their affairs.

You probably have black-on-white porn from the internet present on your hard drive as we speak.
 >:(
Now you have to be kidding me.  I suppose you feel that it is acceptable for Blacks to call Ol-Whitey down to the lowest as well use the "N-Word" within every context there is and still believe that it is somehow insulting?  Dude, give your head a shake.  Did you see how quick it took the Blacks to label Richards a Jew even on CNN.  When the other Black fellow came out and said that Richards wasn't a Jew, did you ever hear the other black fellow admit his mistake and appologize for his Holocaust remark?   Perhaps you might listen to .50cent and ask yourself if this entire "urban" "culture" is good for your children?  I truly don't see the point of appologizing for his outburst, it wasn't accepted or going to be accepted anyway.  There is no difference in my opinion to Richards who blasts off at racist hecklers and Chris Rock who spends 10 minutes saying how much he hates Whites, all whites because he doesn't discriminate as "comedy" without hecklers....  Both are saying their feelings even though one acts out of disgust and the other out of "comedy"...  Sorry my friend, I disagree with your opinion...
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: cjd on November 23, 2006, 07:31:05 AM
As if there is some difference between calling a black man a niqqer to his face as opposed to saying it behind his back?

I can see that some of you really get off on dehumanizing black people.  I would even bet money that those of you who do actually get a "boost" from doing it, thus the constant obsession with black people and their affairs.

You probably have black-on-white porn from the internet present on your hard drive as we speak.
 >:(
The difference is political correctness nothing more. I am sure if the black hecklers didn't start with him he would not have said what he did.

Most black people dehumanize themselves by acting worse than animals. Black people can have all the "affairs" they want the problem is they want to subject white people to them by moving into white neighborhoods and society. Talk about obsessions. They then  demanding recognition for lifestyles and behavior that most white folks find extremely repulsive. You don't find many white folks wanting to move into a predominately black neighborhood or black society so where is the obsession.  The boost would be if I never had to be subjected to many of the low creatures that black society produces. Separate but equal has always sounded real good to me.
As for the black on white porn or white on black porn I would regard that as almost a form of bestiality. Its all to evident by the mutant creatures that form of activity produces.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: MarZutra on November 23, 2006, 08:06:55 AM
Quote
The difference is political correctness nothing more. I am sure if the black hecklers didn't start with him he would not have said what he did.

Most black people dehumanize themselves by acting worse than animals. Black people can have all the "affairs" they want the problem is they want to subject white people to them by moving into white neighborhoods and society. Talk about obsessions. They then  demanding recognition for lifestyles and behavior that most white folks find extremely repulsive. You don't find many white folks wanting to move into a predominately black neighborhood or black society so where is the obsession.  The boost would be if I never had to be subjected to many of the low creatures that black society produces. Separate but equal has always sounded real good to me.
As for the black on white porn or white on black porn I would regard that as almost a form of bestiality. Its all to evident by the mutant creatures that form of activity produces.
Quote
Very well put and agreed.  I cannot add more but only wish to place the immense pressure from the political and hedonistic "Left" onto White society to become more "tolerant" and embrace "diversity" while throwing away their good culture in praise of every animalistic non-productive ideology/culture that happens to land on our shores.  A good example of how one can see the true difference between culture and values of the two people/cultures is to (even if one doesn't like the music) is to watch a country video, listening to the words and than chance it to MTV and watch theirs while listening to the words.  If anyone can argue anything positive of the latter or hasn't puked in a bucket before hand, needs their head examined.   Another good reason why are taxes are so high and our children are dumbed down...
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: Yochanan Zev on November 24, 2006, 12:26:33 PM
Quote
Now you have to be kidding me.  I suppose you feel that it is acceptable for Blacks to call Ol-Whitey down to the lowest as well use the "N-Word" within every context there is and still believe that it is somehow insulting?  Dude, give your head a shake.  Did you see how quick it took the Blacks to label Richards a Jew even on CNN.  When the other Black fellow came out and said that Richards wasn't a Jew, did you ever hear the other black fellow admit his mistake and appologize for his Holocaust remark?   Perhaps you might listen to .50cent and ask yourself if this entire "urban" "culture" is good for your children?  I truly don't see the point of appologizing for his outburst, it wasn't accepted or going to be accepted anyway.  There is no difference in my opinion to Richards who blasts off at racist hecklers and Chris Rock who spends 10 minutes saying how much he hates Whites, all whites because he doesn't discriminate as "comedy" without hecklers....  Both are saying their feelings even though one acts out of disgust and the other out of "comedy"...  Sorry my friend, I disagree with your opinion...
Quote

Michael Richard self-identifies as being Jewish.  If you go to the last paragraph of this article, his agent testifies to this:

""I've been very involved in the African-American community for 25 to 30 years," Rubenstein said. "It would be a tragedy if this exacerbated our race relations. I hope I can help. ... It's always been an effort on my part to improve African-American and Jewish ethnic relations."

As for reports that Richards shouted out anti-Semitic remarks during another standup comedy routine in April, Rubenstein confirmed his client did, but that he was only role-playing.

"He's Jewish. He's not anti-Semitic at all. He was role-playing, he was playing a part. He did use inappropriate language, but he doesn't have any anti-Semitic feelings whatsoever," Rubenstein said."

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061123/D8LIPF4G1.html

All the more reason for you guys to give him praise I'd imagine.  :-[

Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: Joe Gutfeld on November 24, 2006, 12:41:45 PM
If micheal richards is jewish than I am Mickey Mouse.  Anyone who apperead on Seinfeld is a loser.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: Yochanan Zev on November 24, 2006, 01:10:23 PM
You think that his agent, who himself is Jewish, would want to make something like that up?  Does the possiblity surprise you?
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: MarZutra on November 24, 2006, 02:08:33 PM
Perhaps you must have got this information from "Jew Watch" or something.  CNN, who I dislike, interviewed his friend who said he wasn't Jewish after some black talk show host quickly labeled him a Jew and spewed comments about the Holocaust which I do not believe he appologized for.  His father is William Richards and his mother is nice Italian Catholic Phyllis Nardozzi.
FYI:  Michael Richards was born in Culver City, California, to William Richards, an electrical engineer, and Phyllis Nardozzi, a medical records librarian. Richards was raised as a Catholic [2], though his publicist would later mistakingly refer to Richards as Jewish following the racism controversy. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Richards)
http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=16838

Richards may well be fond of Jews but he himself is NOT a Jew period, end, full stop.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: Raptorman on November 24, 2006, 03:09:18 PM
http://us.video.aol.com/video.index.adp?mode=1&pmmsid=1772645

Quote
We're sorry, this feature requires the Mozilla ActiveX Plugin. Click here to install.

You got to be kidding me?

Open myself up to every piece of spyware, malware, viruses and trojans available to humankind? AOL, what other reason do they need ActiveX to view a video other then infect the living hell out of your computer?

Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: MasterWolf1 on November 27, 2006, 05:38:52 PM
Americans will end up in jail for telling the truth
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: White Jewish Pride on November 29, 2006, 01:48:09 AM
I just want to say that I am extremely proud of Kramer for expressing openly what the majority of white Americans feels but is afraid to say because of political correctness. GO KRAMER!! STICK THAT FORK UP THEIR BLACK ASSES!!!
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: White Jewish Pride on November 29, 2006, 01:48:44 AM
I just want to say that I am extremely proud of Kramer for expressing openly what the majority of white Americans feels but is afraid to say because of political correctness. GO KRAMER!! STICK THAT FORK UP THEIR BLACK ASSES!!!
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: MarZutra on November 29, 2006, 08:28:54 AM
I just want to say that I am extremely proud of Kramer for expressing openly what the majority of white Americans feels but is afraid to say because of political correctness. GO KRAMER!! STICK THAT FORK UP THEIR BLACK ASSES!!!
The sad fact is, that I agree with you 100%.  If one wishes to study "Black History" it is one of catering to, appeasement and "wealth transfer" via racially segregated programs continually trying to "elevate" the blacks with the whites with a very long list of examples found by anyone above the bare minimum of intelect.  The result of desegregation was the collapse of the educational institution in its entirety.  The result of Rosa Parks was black rioting and the burning of almost every major city center in the United States.  This was the result of catering to them.  The Black Panthers were, again, to cater to Negros by Ol-Whitey in their "utopian" movement.  Perhaps, when Heuy P. Newton sodomized Bobby Seele tearing his anus apart is another example of the "Liberated" "Utopian black culture to come? 

The average White school student receives about $60 per capita for educational funding while their black, and now increasing hispanic receives in the vacinity of $1200-$1500 per student.  Even with such a massive tax payer (majority Whites) outlay for education, social, legal, marital and economical programs racially directed at Blacks specifically has ended in failure and rising levels in human/social deprevity in all areas: rapes, robbing, shootings, stabbings, thefts etc.  The result of this continual catering and total failure of the black community itself has only furthered the development of racial gangsters and black racists to continually extort Ol-Whitey on purely bigotry: Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, Communist King, Parks and many many others.

The flood was a good example.  Very few actually owned their own homes but somehow they were the center of attention, never showing the flooding and ruin of Ol-whitey's suberban homes.  I can totally understand breaking into a store to steal food and perhaps clean clothing in times of tragedy but to be caught on CNN exiting a looted department store carrying radios, television sets, furniture, appliances by the hundreds is not only appalling but further evidence in the values, moral differences and total cultural differances between white, even poor whites, and the average black. 

I'd not have appologized for standing up to assault be it verbal or physical.  When blacks appologize for their actions and deeds than perhaps he should appologize.  When blacks themselve stop using "The N-Word" or racial slurs towards Whites, Jews and clean up their deprave culture and society, than perhaps he should appologize but NOT until it has happened....and not to filth like "Rev" Jesse Jackoff!  How can a Marxist be a "Rev"?  Agreed Dr.Goldstein.... Agreed!  May more whites find their man/womanhood and stand up to the "Political Correct", "embracing diversity", "multicultural" dumbing down.  We have been bent over, by Marxism and Marxists, for far too long....
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: davkakach on November 29, 2006, 10:43:53 AM
The race wars are coming.  20-30 years tops.
Title: Re: Kramer from seinfeld on [censored]
Post by: sat_chit_anand on November 29, 2006, 11:11:47 AM
The race wars are coming.  20-30 years tops.

Coming? I think that they have already started.