JTF.ORG Forum

Save Western Civilization => Save America => Topic started by: spiritus_persona on May 06, 2008, 10:12:23 PM

Title: Virgins
Post by: spiritus_persona on May 06, 2008, 10:12:23 PM
I don't understand why people laugh at virgins.  It just means that they haven't had sex.  I think it's the sick perverts in Hollywood that portray the virgin as a loser and to be laughed at.  What are your thoughts?
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: nopeaceforland on May 06, 2008, 10:20:29 PM
I don't understand why people laugh at virgins.  It just means that they haven't had sex.  I think it's the sick perverts in Hollywood that portray the virgin as a loser and to be laughed at.  What are your thoughts?

Unfortunately there's a lot of unmarried people walking around with disease farms in their pants.
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Lisa on May 06, 2008, 10:49:53 PM
There is a lot of pressure for young women to put out.  The ones who don't are really ridiculed, and it's not just by the Hollyweird crowd.  The website Askmen.com had an article about young virgin women.  The writer cautioned the readers not to get involved with a virgin woman. 

I also read an article on Salon.com about virign women in the 20's who whose boyfriends/dates dump them once they reveal that they are virgins.  It's a very messed up world we live in. 

Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: White Israelite on May 06, 2008, 11:03:13 PM
I don't understand why people laugh at virgins.  It just means that they haven't had sex.  I think it's the sick perverts in Hollywood that portray the virgin as a loser and to be laughed at.  What are your thoughts?

Depends, if someones living with their mom until their 40, a virgin, and they still asking her to make them a sammich, then I will laugh at them. I call those mama's boys.
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Lisa on May 06, 2008, 11:37:53 PM
Good for you, Yehudit!
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Scriabin on May 06, 2008, 11:42:41 PM
I don't understand why people laugh at virgins.  It just means that they haven't had sex.  I think it's the sick perverts in Hollywood that portray the virgin as a loser and to be laughed at.  What are your thoughts?

Men who get lots of sex NEVER accomplish Great things.

The Greatest Men who ever lived were sexual Puritans.
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Dont Tread on Me on June 01, 2008, 03:29:33 AM
I'm 23 years old and I'm still a virgin, and I'm male. It's not that I have a strong moral conviction towards virginity, but more along the lines of I believe in sex amongst people that are lovers, rather than a casual occurrence.
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Harzel on June 01, 2008, 04:52:45 PM
I don't understand why people laugh at virgins.  It just means that they haven't had sex.  I think it's the sick perverts in Hollywood that portray the virgin as a loser and to be laughed at.  What are your thoughts?

Men who get lots of sex NEVER accomplish Great things.

The Greatest Men who ever lived were sexual Puritans.

Yes- Like Bethoven for example ...
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: shimon on June 01, 2008, 05:00:22 PM
I don't understand why people laugh at virgins.  It just means that they haven't had sex.  I think it's the sick perverts in Hollywood that portray the virgin as a loser and to be laughed at.  What are your thoughts?

Men who get lots of sex NEVER accomplish Great things.

The Greatest Men who ever lived were sexual Puritans.
yea Alexander the Great never accomplished anything, and neither did King Solomon
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Scriabin on June 01, 2008, 05:14:18 PM
I don't understand why people laugh at virgins.  It just means that they haven't had sex.  I think it's the sick perverts in Hollywood that portray the virgin as a loser and to be laughed at.  What are your thoughts?

Men who get lots of sex NEVER accomplish Great things.

The Greatest Men who ever lived were sexual Puritans.
yea Alexander the Great never accomplished anything, and neither did King Solomon

Alexander the Great and King Solomon likely got those Women AFTER ataining Greatness. 

Furthermore, they would have been even Greater had they not indulged in sexual decadence.
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: shimon on June 01, 2008, 07:24:10 PM
I don't understand why people laugh at virgins.  It just means that they haven't had sex.  I think it's the sick perverts in Hollywood that portray the virgin as a loser and to be laughed at.  What are your thoughts?

Men who get lots of sex NEVER accomplish Great things.

The Greatest Men who ever lived were sexual Puritans.
yea Alexander the Great never accomplished anything, and neither did King Solomon

Alexander the Great and King Solomon likely got those Women AFTER ataining Greatness. 

Furthermore, they would have been even Greater had they not indulged in sexual decadence.
  fair enough
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: WesternPatriot on June 03, 2008, 02:11:06 AM
I'm a virgin, 21 y/o male. I choose to be this way. Just as I choose not be be a drunk or drug addict. Luckily people never ask me about my love life.

I think a large part of the problem is people with no class are very loud mouthed, while the good have not been speaking up for our beliefs. People cave into peer pressure at absurd rates. One thing is for sure, I do not want to go on a date with some other lowlife's sloppy seconds.
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Scriabin on June 03, 2008, 11:22:47 AM
I'm a virgin, 21 y/o male. I choose to be this way. One thing is for sure, I do not want to go on a date with some other lowlife's sloppy seconds.

If Women were real Ladies like they once were in America, you wouldn't have to worry about that.
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Americanhero1 on June 04, 2008, 11:21:02 AM
I don't understand why people laugh at virgins.  It just means that they haven't had sex.  I think it's the sick perverts in Hollywood that portray the virgin as a loser and to be laughed at.  What are your thoughts?

Men who get lots of sex NEVER accomplish Great things.

The Greatest Men who ever lived were sexual Puritans.
yea Alexander the Great never accomplished anything, and neither did King Solomon


But wasn't Alexander The Great a homosexual? That's why he didn't have any heirs and his empire was split into 3 parts.



He was married three times and i dont think he was a homosexual

Alexander's lifelong companion was Hephaestion, the son of a Macedonian noble. Hephaestion also held the position of second-in-command of Alexander's forces until his death, which devastated Alexander. The full extent of his relationship with Hephaestion is the subject of much historical speculation.

Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Harzel on June 04, 2008, 12:37:06 PM
I don't understand why people laugh at virgins.  It just means that they haven't had sex.  I think it's the sick perverts in Hollywood that portray the virgin as a loser and to be laughed at.  What are your thoughts?

Men who get lots of sex NEVER accomplish Great things.

The Greatest Men who ever lived were sexual Puritans.
yea Alexander the Great never accomplished anything, and neither did King Solomon


But wasn't Alexander The Great a homosexual? That's why he didn't have any heirs and his empire was split into 3 parts.



He was married three times and i dont think he was a homosexual

Alexander's lifelong companion was Hephaestion, the son of a Macedonian noble. Hephaestion also held the position of second-in-command of Alexander's forces until his death, which devastated Alexander. The full extent of his relationship with Hephaestion is the subject of much historical speculation.

To my knowledge his death was caused by Alexander impaling him with a spear in a moment of rage. And they were lovers according to the greek sources. Alexander was married but since he spent most of his adult life in military campaigns he probably didn't have much time to inseminate  his wifes since they most likely didn't accompany him.
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Americanhero1 on June 04, 2008, 12:40:48 PM
I don't understand why people laugh at virgins.  It just means that they haven't had sex.  I think it's the sick perverts in Hollywood that portray the virgin as a loser and to be laughed at.  What are your thoughts?

Men who get lots of sex NEVER accomplish Great things.

The Greatest Men who ever lived were sexual Puritans.
yea Alexander the Great never accomplished anything, and neither did King Solomon


But wasn't Alexander The Great a homosexual? That's why he didn't behave any heirs and his empire was split into 3 parts.



He was married three times and i dont think he was a homosexual

Alexander's lifelong companion was Hephaestion, the son of a Macedonian noble. Hephaestion also held the position of second-in-command of Alexander's forces until his death, which devastated Alexander. The full extent of his relationship with Hephaestion is the subject of much historical speculation.

To my knowledge his death was caused by Alexander impaling him with a spear in a moment of rage. And they were lovers according to the greek sources. Alexander was married but since he spent most of his adult life in military campaigns he probably didn't have much time to inseminate  his wifes since they most likely didn't accompany him.


No one will ever know if he was or wasn't a homosexual
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Harzel on June 04, 2008, 01:58:20 PM
But there are historical reports about that
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Americanhero1 on June 04, 2008, 02:00:56 PM
But there are historical reports about that
Historical reports but did the people see him do anything Homosexual most likely not so they dont know either
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Harzel on June 04, 2008, 02:08:49 PM
But there are historical reports about that
Historical reports but did the people see him do anything Homosexual most likely not so they dont know either

Your argument applies to every historical account, at list up to the invention of photography. The historical accounts report, at list to my knowledge, that they were lovers and that this fact was not hidden from the troops, on the contrary there is an account about the troops asking them to kiss in public. Moreover Alexander was given the classical Greek education, where young adult males were expected to have homosexual relations. They have different concepts of sexualities and such behavior was not considered as a fag behaviour but as the normal one.
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Americanhero1 on June 04, 2008, 02:12:05 PM
But there are historical reports about that
Historical reports but did the people see him do anything Homosexual most likely not so they dont know either

Your argument applies to every historical account, at list up to the invention of photography. The historical accounts report, at list to my knowledge, that they were lovers and that this fact was not hidden from the troops, on the contrary there is an account about the troops asking them to kiss in public. Moreover Alexander was given the classical Greek education, where young adult males were expected to have homosexual relations. They have different concepts of sexualities and such behavior was not considered as a fag behaviour but as the normal one.



So if back then it was not considered homosexual then how is he gay then shouldn't they call him bisexual?
Title: Re: Virgins
Post by: Harzel on June 04, 2008, 02:29:05 PM
But there are historical reports about that
Historical reports but did the people see him do anything Homosexual most likely not so they dont know either

Your argument applies to every historical account, at list up to the invention of photography. The historical accounts report, at list to my knowledge, that they were lovers and that this fact was not hidden from the troops, on the contrary there is an account about the troops asking them to kiss in public. Moreover Alexander was given the classical Greek education, where young adult males were expected to have homosexual relations. They have different concepts of sexualities and such behavior was not considered as a fag behaviour but as the normal one.



So if back then it was not considered homosexual then how is he gay then shouldn't they call him bisexual?

Yes I agree with that, they should call homosexual or 'gay' because he most likely wasn't one.