JTF.ORG Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on January 23, 2007, 02:23:30 AM

Title: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on January 23, 2007, 02:23:30 AM
Well... go to town, guys!  :D

Chaimfan
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on January 23, 2007, 03:25:07 AM
... and the First Dyke is a lesbian Nazi.

Let's see:

--Bareback wants every illegal to get citizenship, 40 acres, and a mule.
--Drooliani wants full gay marriage and even more subsidized baby slaughter.
--McGayne wants us to merge with Mexihole and in general wants a world government.

I agree that the outright anti-Semites are the worst, but none of the leaders I listed really care about Israel in the least.
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Fruit of thy loins on January 23, 2007, 08:07:10 AM
In my school classes here in the UK, although I wanted to be a radical left-winger I was always very impressed when I read about the things Giulliani did.  Taking criminals and undesirables off the streets is always an under-appreciated miracle which people don't fully appreciate until the low-lifes come crawling back.
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Scriabin on January 23, 2007, 10:47:59 AM
It matters not who is elected president.  We'll be sold out in the end.

We have to change things!

Does anyone honestly think that politicians can save our dying country?

The election process is a fraud, a waste of time. 
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: fjack on January 23, 2007, 11:57:26 AM
The sad part is when you see all these people on the same list you realize that we are in serious serious trouble. No matter who runs or gets elected we are still in a downward trainwreck.
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Shoshana on June 24, 2007, 11:22:03 PM
Definitly Ron Paul.
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Jasmina on June 24, 2007, 11:40:13 PM
Hillary Clinton has to be on top because she has an actual chance of winning... G-d forbid !
I really despise The Clintons , I'm biased for obvious reasons.
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: OdKahaneChai on June 25, 2007, 03:40:44 AM
I agree with Yasmine - I said the First Dyke.  Policy-wise, she's just as evil as Adolf Paul or Barack Osama - but then "Dyke" and "Clinton" take her down a bit more.
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Dan on June 25, 2007, 10:20:55 AM
BAraCK Hussein Obama, is clearly the most vile!
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Matthias Corvinus on June 27, 2007, 08:43:05 PM
The pictures speak for themselves:  >:(

(http://www.stentorian.com/MoveOn/sharpton_obama.jpg)

(http://www.stentorian.com/MoveOn/clinton_sharpton.jpg)
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: cosmokramer on July 03, 2007, 04:54:28 AM
They are so many presidential candidates in 2008 that are reeking of drek, I cant make up my mind whos most evil.
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: ScotcH on July 03, 2007, 09:08:47 AM
Go with Freddy Thompson, the good Ol' Boy from "BAMA !

As least we know he doesn't hate 'Whitey' !
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: mord on July 13, 2007, 12:01:58 PM
Well i like Duncan Hunter      http://www.gohunter08.com/
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: kellymaureen on July 13, 2007, 12:03:31 PM
Osama obama is a muslim....he would be death for the US, even more frightening is the thought of osama obama and hitlery teaming up and winning....that is a nightmare that we can't allow.
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Muck DeFuslims on July 13, 2007, 12:33:59 PM
I voted for the mooozie schvartza.

It took about a nanosecond to decide.

Nothing could be worse than a mooozie president.

And I mean NOTHING.
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Alexander on July 13, 2007, 01:33:23 PM
I chose Hillary. They are all horrible candidates but we have already seen what she would do with the little power that she had during Bill's reign. There is no doubt that she would try to enact everything that she could not back then.

Please excuse my ignorance on Ron Paul. I have not followed politics very closely for years because they all disgust me but I remember Paul being a libertarian, small govt. type of politician. What has he done or said that was Nazi-like?
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: EuroAmerican on July 15, 2007, 03:18:23 PM
What has he done or said that was Nazi-like?

He's not exactly a Nazi. But he is an isolationist. At this time in history, that WILL NOT help America.

Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Alexander on July 15, 2007, 05:37:13 PM
What has he done or said that was Nazi-like?

He's not exactly a Nazi. But he is an isolationist. At this time in history, that WILL NOT help America.


Thank you EuroAmerican. I do remember that the Libertarians are isolationists which does not make much sense these days.
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: RationalThought110 on July 17, 2007, 02:39:05 AM
What has he done or said that was Nazi-like?

He's not exactly a Nazi. But he is an isolationist. At this time in history, that WILL NOT help America.


Thank you EuroAmerican. I do remember that the Libertarians are isolationists which does not make much sense these days.


It depends on the situation.  The US should have not interfered in Kosovo. 
Title: ;)
Post by: SirGallantry on July 17, 2007, 09:33:49 AM
;)
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: newman on July 17, 2007, 09:48:23 AM
Whitehouse dinner function 2009:

 (http://www.imagehosting.com/out.php/i916355_niggerkfc.jpg) (http://www.imagehosting.com)
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: MassuhDGoodName on July 17, 2007, 09:55:47 AM
Cherubim:  "...Neo-Conservativism, which descends from the post-WWII mentality that we are not alone in the world, and more significantly gave official recognition to Israel in 1948 happens to stem from the Jeffersonian, Wilsonian line of alliances with foreign nations which was finally realized with the formation of the U.N.  This line of thought was considered progressive until Vietnam, when the hippie protesters began calling their nation's interventionist policies oppressing.  Therefore, the alliance War Hawks became synonymous with the New Right (Neo-Con), while the Old Right (Paleo-Con) of maintaining a strong military for only America's border security either merged with the New Right, or remains on the fringe in the likeness of the Reform Party of Ross Perot who offered Bill Clinton the Presidency in '92 by getting his Old Guard Nazi pals to vote against G.H.W.Bush.
Btw the hippie, minority-lovers have controlled the Democratic Party ever since Vietnam and Welfare... "

Cherubim,
Never before has anyone so concisely defined the entirety of American politics and America's foreign relations.
You've also pointed out for all to see, the real traitors to proper civilization.
You not only have pointed out who they are; but what they are!
Every school in America should be forced to have you lecture their entire student body.
The reason so many Americans are confused today is because they need explanations such as yours to fill in the missing censored history of America and what it stands for!
Title: ;)
Post by: SirGallantry on July 17, 2007, 10:52:21 AM
;)
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: EuroAmerican on July 17, 2007, 11:13:06 AM



It depends on the situation.  The US should have not interfered in Kosovo. 
[/quote]

             I said at this point in history. America was not fighting Islam at that point. Yeah, we should have but we weren't. Blame Clinton, but don't drag the whole country down with him. 
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Alexander on July 17, 2007, 04:36:13 PM
Thank you Cherubim. That was a clear and detailed account of the recent political landscape.
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Muck DeFuslims on July 17, 2007, 06:26:08 PM
"the children of post-Affirmative Action America are being given a chance to take their nation back"

I must have missed the end of the affirmative action era.

When did this occur ?
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Muck DeFuslims on July 17, 2007, 07:31:29 PM
Can you site one of these cases ?

Even if you can, it's meaningless, because 'minorities' are getting as much preferential treatment as ever, and reverse discrimination continues unabated.

If you honestly think affirmative action hirings have waned, you need to get out more.

Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: Muck DeFuslims on July 17, 2007, 09:24:35 PM
But you can't site a supreme court ruling deeming affirmative action unconstitutional ?

Just forced integration ? Well, it's nice to know that my white children can't be forced to take a bus to integrate an all black school, but that's a far cry from making affirmative action unconstitutional, isn't it ?

Trust me, I'd like to see America enter the 'post-Affirmative action' era as much as you do, it just hasn't happened yet.
Title: Re: Worst Possible 2008 Presidential Candidate
Post by: RationalThought110 on July 18, 2007, 03:17:52 AM
Thank you EuroAmerican. I do remember that the Libertarians are isolationists which does not make much sense these days.

This Moron Paul isn't a Libertarian.  That title is only an acceptable cover for his Paleo-Con objective to get us back to our protectionist past before the arrival of the Great Depression.  Paul's rhetoric is similar in tone to none other than Pig-Nazi Pat Buchanan who is nothing short of an Authoritarian dictator.

The true Libertarians in this race are in the mold of a Moody Giuliani, and other Liberals who believe a woman and her doctor have a right to make a decision in murdering her fetus, and support flaming queers' rights to dress up in drag and walk down the aisle together. 

Neo-Conservativism, which descends from the post-WWII mentality that we are not alone in the world, and more significantly gave official recognition to Israel in 1948 happens to stem from the Jeffersonian, Wilsonian line of alliances with foreign nations which was finally realized with the formation of the U.N.  This line of thought was considered progressive until Vietnam, when the hippie protesters began calling their nation's interventionist policies oppressing.  Therefore, the alliance War Hawks became synonymous with the New Right (Neo-Con), while the Old Right (Paleo-Con) of maintaining a strong military for only America's border security either merged with the New Right, or remains on the fringe in the likeness of the Reform Party of Ross Perot who offered Bill Clinton the Presidency in '92 by getting his Old Guard Nazi pals to vote against G.H.W.Bush.
Btw the hippie, minority-lovers have controlled the Democratic Party ever since Vietnam and Welfare... ::)


I find some of this confusing.  I thought many neoconservatives don't like the UN.   The hippies basically kicked the war hawks out of the Democrat party like how they forced Joe Lieberman into running as an independent? 

Perot supports Nazis?