JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on September 03, 2008, 12:33:43 PM
-
Michael Savage, that phony self-hating Jew, obviously wants Barack Hussein Obama to win the election. Savage says he will not vote for the McCain-Palin ticket, and he is discouraging his conservative Republican audience from supporting the ticket. That can only help Obama.
When callers tell Savage that they have now decided not to vote for the McCain-Palin ticket, he agrees with them and praises them.
Savage knows that McCain cannot remove Palin at this point. That would be the end of McCain. When George McGovern removed his initial vice presidential choice in 1972, Tom Eagleton, the McGovern campaign literally collapsed. McGovern never recovered. In November, Richard Nixon beat McGovern in 49 out of the 50 states. The Eagleton removal was a major reason for the landslide defeat.
Savage has millions of listeners, and most of them are conservative Republicans. If Savage convinces even just 10% of them not to vote for McCain, that could tip the election to Obama if the race is close in November. There is no doubt that that is what Savage is trying to do. Why would he do this? I have no idea what the motives of this sick self-hating Jew could be.
I tried to warn people about this fraud. But people want to have a conservative spokesman so desperately, that they are willing to overlook almost anything. Savage knows that even if his actions lead to the election of Obama, G-d forbid, all he has to do in 2009 is start speaking like a "rightwinger" again and all will be forgiven and forgotten.
This election is the moment of truth, and in the moment of truth, Savage is betraying us. This proves that giving this huge platform to opportunistic and dishonest frauds like Savage does not help the conservative cause. In fact, giving Savage this huge platform on the radio is VERY DANGEROUS. He has his own twisted agenda, and his actions can now lead to an Obama victory, which in turn can lead to the murder of millions of innocent people from an Iranian nuclear terrorist holocaust.
Chaim, I of course agree with you 110%, but I want to take this time to ask you to support me now. For as long as I have been here, I have been warning forum members against the homosexual kapo Michael Faggot--enlightening people about his once uber-liberal views, his highly probable sexual relationship with out-and-proud homosexual Allen Ginsberg, his sexual encounter with a young Polynesian man, his viciously anti-Israel comments (that he retracted as soon as it became clear his listeners weren't buying them), his defense of Islam, his public denigration of his own Judaism (when he brags about eating ham and cheese sandwiches), and his support for the wetback invasion--not to mention how he constantly rips us off--and for the most part all I have gotten in response is abuse. It seems like some people here think Michael Faggot is just as worthy a conservative force as this movement is, and I can't understand that. Why is it so taboo here to denounce the worthless lowlife effeminate Michael Faggot?
From day one, I have stood behind you every step of the way in denouncing this piece of hog excrement. Michael Faggot is a threat to the conservative movement, a threat to the United States, and a mortal danger to the free world. Michael Faggot is about as right-wing as he is Jewish, and he's about as Jewish as his hero, Sheik Nasrallah, is. Not too many forum members have completely, and without any reservation, agreed with you 100% on Michael Faggot. I am one of them, and so are Cosmokramer and DownwithIslam. Beyond that, there may be a couple others, but the majority have defended him at least at some point. I never have, Chaim, and lots of people have gotten mad at me because of that--because I will not suck the tuchis of this perverse drain of the universe's oxygen.
Now, as for your point--I can tell you why he wants Obama to win, plain and simple. First off, he's a self-hating kapo k**e, and therefore the most important mitzvot in his religion is to fall down and worship the Negro. Secondly, as a probable homosexual, he is likely attracted to Obama. However, most importantly, he is probably being paid to do this by the ultra-flush Obama campaign. People like Dykael Faggot only care about money. Faggot would accept money from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (yimach schmo) if he offered it. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if that is why he accused Israel of committing atrocities in 2006. I am 99% certain that there is a financial motive behind this, Chaim.
In closing, I'd like for you to defend me when I speak the truth about Michael Faggot. Oh, and one last thing: yimach schmo to Michael Faggot. >:(
Chaimfan
-
So, you don't like him?
-
C.F, you're a grown up and very capable of defending yourself.
-
If Chaim wanted to respond to it, he would. I think that the sticky feature should be used more responsibly on your part C.F.
-
He's a very busy man, and can't be on the forum 24/7, and besides I did not sticky it.
-
And besides C.F. why do you have to be the chastity police, and you equate every object of your attacks as a homosexual pervert ?
-
And besides C.F. why do you have to be the chastity police, and you equate every object of your attacks as a homosexual pervert ?
Not to insult you C.F., But "Pruneface" and "Michael Faggot" are a bit "elementary School" and I don't think it is necessary on the forum. Constructive Criticism.
-
Who unstickied this?
-
With all do respect, what if Savage is right about Palin?
-
I too hate the fact that Savage hates Sarah Palin. All talk show hosts have disagrements with us. Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh. I bet even G Gordon Liddy has some. That is something that we all have to execpt. But to give the ultamite curse and to call him a Faggot just goes over the line. Savage I find to be one of the smartest and best talk show hosts. All these hosts that I mentioned are the only people who talk to a mass audicnce with Consertative Talking points. Fox News doesn't and neither does CNN, or MSNBC.
And I don't know who unsticked this but Chaim said in an Ask JTF about a month ago that there were too many unnessary stickies this would be one of those that don't belong.
-
How in the world is he "right" about Palin? He is trotting out the left's tired character attacks on her.
-
How in the world is he "right" about Palin? He is trotting out the left's tired character attacks on her.
You are right about this.
-
And I do not simply use "faggot" as an insult in this case. There is a lot of evidence that he is a homosexual.
-
And I do not simply use "faggot" as an insult in this case. There is a lot of evidence that he is a homosexual.
Then show it because I am not convinced
-
Why aren't you convinced? I posted a bunch of links a few weeks ago. In addition, have you heard the way he talks, or his obsession with poodles? He is obviously effeminate.
You don't believe he could be gay just because he is a "conservative"? So was J. Edgar Hoover.
-
C.F. you raise a good point in regards to his poodle talk. I guess better he discusses this than his bowel movements. 8;)
-
Please. This is crazy he was married twice. He hates Gays.
-
Some people like poodles because if you are allergic to dogs you can own them because of the poodles hair
-
David, don't you think his marital problems might say something?
PS: Americanhero, I doubt this is because of his allergies. He clearly has effeminate thoughts and speech.
-
It will be interesting to see how his position on Palin wil affect his ratings.
-
With all do respect, what if Savage is right about Palin?
But he doesn't stop at that, to my understanding he actually tries to sabotage McCain's bid because he says that the McCain-Palin ticket is no better than Obama-Biden, his advice to his conservative audience to stay home on election day and let Obama win. And as a political 'Pundit' he says that McCain should revoke Palin's nomination and by that commit a political suicide.
-
And I do not simply use "faggot" as an insult in this case. There is a lot of evidence that he is a homosexual.
I believe you in his case but I just don't think that it is relevant. If he isn't raising the homosexual flag than it is a private matter.
-
Zelhar, I can think of at least one way that it is immediately relevant. If he is indeed a closeted homosexual (and I strongly think that he is), then he will favor whatever candidates promise a more pro-gay policy. A McCain presidency would certainly suck-up to homosexuals, but it isn't likely to go overboard in giving them even more of the country (i.e. McCain probably will not push for ending "don't ask don't tell" in the military or mandating universal recognition of same-sex "marriage"). On the other hand, we have no doubt as to where Barack Hussein Obama stands on homosexual "rights". Since Michael Faggot is all but telling his listeners to vote for Obama, there can be little question that this is exactly what he wants.
-
David, don't you think his marital problems might say something?
PS: Americanhero, I doubt this is because of his allergies. He clearly has effeminate thoughts and speech.
CF,
This is very unfair. Marital problems dont make you homosexual. I divorced my wife of 10 years because of issues of her fidelity.... In the end I forgave her and we are back and have turned our lives around. You cannot judge a man by what his wife does or doesn't do.
muman613
PS: Ive been accused of being a homosexual by people who dont know me. I dont have very many women friends because it is not righteous for a man to have many women friends. My wife is my only female friend.
-
Why aren't you convinced? I posted a bunch of links a few weeks ago. In addition, have you heard the way he talks, or his obsession with poodles? He is obviously effeminate.
You don't believe he could be gay just because he is a "conservative"? So was J. Edgar Hoover.
OK, where are the moderators, I take offense at this. I have had 2 standards poodles as pets. Does this mean I have to start hitting on CF?
-
Why aren't you convinced? I posted a bunch of links a few weeks ago. In addition, have you heard the way he talks, or his obsession with poodles? He is obviously effeminate.
You don't believe he could be gay just because he is a "conservative"? So was J. Edgar Hoover.
OK, where are the moderators, I take offense at this. I have had 2 standards poodles as pets. Does this mean I have to start hitting on CF?
These dogs are not that bad
(http://dogbreeds.fyiabout.com/wp-content/uploads/image/standard-poodle.jpg)
-
בס''ד
1. I apologize to CF for not responding sooner. This is the first time that I am seeing this thread.
2. CF is indeed a very loyal and important member of our movement.
3. CF has been right in understanding that Michael Savage is a complete phony. Every time I said this in the past, most of our members disagreed with me. But CF instinctively understood that Savage is engaged in a big scam.
4. Our great members who were mistaken about Savage had the best of intentions. These JTFers want so badly to believe that someone with a big audience is actually doing something good. So they were willing to overlook Savage's past behavior: for years, this self-hating Jew condemned Israel and called for the creation of an independent PLO terrorist state in Israel's heartland. Savage also repeats the same lies about "moderate" Muslims and even refers to Nazi Islam as a "great religion". But our members desperately want to believe that someone with a big audience is fighting to prevent disaster. Again, our members have the best of intentions.
5. Now everyone can clearly see how dangerous it is to give a big platform to a fraud like Savage. Thanks to Savage, we may end up getting Barack Hussein Obama in the White House, G-d forbid. Savage has an audience of millions of listeners. If he convinces even several hundred thousand not to vote for John McCain, in a close election that could make the difference. Savage is not just terrible, he is dangerous to all of us.
6. We now have more than enough indisputable information to turn conservatives and Republicans against Savage. Without conservatives and Republicans, you can't have a big radio audience because leftists and Democrats generally do not listen to talk radio. In my opinion, we should stick to the indisputable fact that Savage is now sabotaging the McCain-Palin ticket. I think that calling Savage a "faggot" undermines our argument. I have known Jews like Savage, and I do not get the impression that he is a homosexual. In any event, without real evidence, making this accusation harms our credibility.
Anyway, you asked for my honest opinion. G-d bless you CF. You are truly a righteous person.
-
I find it rather PECULIAR that 'Michael "faggot" as CF says is gay..considering in 2003, he got fired off of his Television show on MSNBC, BECAUSE HE BLASTED GAYS...this would mean that he blasted his own SELF, and kicked his OWN butt of TV...Savage ADMITS he is an egotist. Most people in the spotlight ARE.
IF you dont like Savage, CF- WHATEVER....that is YOUR affair, but MANY people here DO listen and like Savage. My whole family read his books, and REALIZED that they themselves were LIBERALIZED, AFTER reading them, NOT everyone posts on forums on the internet--. Just b/c people like Savage, does NOT mean that they DONT LIKE Chaim, as you told me: 'Why would you want a 'burger' when with Chaim I can have filet mignon'. ---You JUDGED ME, & INSINUATED that I respect Savage MORE than Chaim, and THAT, Sir, is UNTRUTH. TOTALLY, to the MAX.
I will ALSO add that in one of your previous posts TO ME today, you just about accused ME almost of being ANTI-SEMITIC, THAT, is one reason, Sir- that I will not EVER post to one more of YOUR posts, EVER again. ---THAT IS DISGUSTING, considering I am a Crypto-Jewess-- NEVER in MY life, have I had to read such veiled ACCUSATIONS about MYSELF like you did today CF. EVER. Me, ANTI SEMITIC?? MY G-d, man!!!! SELL CRAZY somewhere ELSE!!!
I do not believe that Savage is right, at all right now, for doing this, when our nation is in dire straits, (with Palin) and I ADMIT this after thinking hard about it...HOWEVER, if what goes on inside the house of the Palins is deemed as righteous, then I am VERY UNRIGHTEOUS. Having sex, and getting knocked up, and drinking schnapps is NOT my idea of CONSERVATISM, AT ALL, when ones mother is a Governor, especially, and as Conservatives, if we just CONDONE this behavior- there will be NO CONSERVATIVE takeover of the GOP. I am voting GOP for ONE reason, and ONE ONLY: THE ALTERNATIVE IS UNTHINKABLE...as is said by a member on this forum. G-d Bless the members on this forum, and PLEASE- when you see what is 'deemed' as "righteous" and OK, please STAND AGAINST IT.
MSNBC fires Michael Savage after anti-gay comments
NEW YORK (AP) — MSNBC on Monday fired Michael Savage for anti-gay comments.
The popular radio talk show host who did a weekend TV show for the cable channel referred to an unidentified caller to his show Saturday as a "sodomite" and said he should "get AIDS and die."
"His comments were extremely inappropriate and the decision was an easy one," MSNBC spokesman Jeremy Gaines said.
There was no immediate comment from Savage, according to a spokesman at his office in California.
The brash, tough-talking Savage is one of radio's hottest jocks. His Paul Revere Society advocates closing borders, deporting illegal immigrants, mandating health tests for immigrants and eliminating entitlement programs.
The televised version of The Savage Nation began March 8 despite the protests of such advocacy groups as the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation.
Aired at 5 p.m. ET Saturday, Savage didn't translate into a television hit. He increased the ratings for the time slot marginally, according to MSNBC.
The incident that resulted in his firing began innocently enough. Savage was taking viewer phone calls about airline horror stories, and a male caller began talking about smoking in the bathroom.
"Half an hour into the flight, I need to suggest that Don and Mike take your ..." the caller said, before he was cut off and his words became unintelligible.
"So you're one of those sodomists. Are you a sodomite?" Savage asked.
The caller replied: "Yes, I am."
"Oh, you're one of the sodomites," Savage said. "You should only get AIDS and die, you pig. How's that? Why don't you see if you can sue me, you pig. You got nothing better than to put me down, you piece of garbage. You have got nothing to do today, go eat a sausage and choke on it."
He asked for another phone caller who "didn't have a nice night in the bathhouse who's angry at me today."
These bums "mean nothing to me," he said.
GLAAD spokeswoman Cathy Renna said of Savage's firing: "It's about time.
"This latest attack made the clearest case for why Savage has no place on any reputable news network. MSNBC witnessed firsthand exactly the kind of verbal assaults GLAAD's been warning them about for the past five months, and to their credit, they backed up their promises to hold Savage accountable."
-
Why aren't you convinced? I posted a bunch of links a few weeks ago. In addition, have you heard the way he talks, or his obsession with poodles? He is obviously effeminate.
You don't believe he could be gay just because he is a "conservative"? So was J. Edgar Hoover.
OK, where are the moderators, I take offense at this. I have had 2 standards poodles as pets. Does this mean I have to start hitting on CF?
Of course having a breed of dog doesn't make you gay. Why should we even have to discuss this? Of course, if your dog is named fluffypoopikins and you color its fur pink then you may have a problem.
-
Michael Savage, that phony self-hating Jew, obviously wants Barack Hussein Obama to win the election. Savage says he will not vote for the McCain-Palin ticket, and he is discouraging his conservative Republican audience from supporting the ticket. That can only help Obama.
When callers tell Savage that they have now decided not to vote for the McCain-Palin ticket, he agrees with them and praises them.
Savage knows that McCain cannot remove Palin at this point. That would be the end of McCain. When George McGovern removed his initial vice presidential choice in 1972, Tom Eagleton, the McGovern campaign literally collapsed. McGovern never recovered. In November, Richard Nixon beat McGovern in 49 out of the 50 states. The Eagleton removal was a major reason for the landslide defeat.
Savage has millions of listeners, and most of them are conservative Republicans. If Savage convinces even just 10% of them not to vote for McCain, that could tip the election to Obama if the race is close in November. There is no doubt that that is what Savage is trying to do. Why would he do this? I have no idea what the motives of this sick self-hating Jew could be.
I tried to warn people about this fraud. But people want to have a conservative spokesman so desperately, that they are willing to overlook almost anything. Savage knows that even if his actions lead to the election of Obama, G-d forbid, all he has to do in 2009 is start speaking like a "rightwinger" again and all will be forgiven and forgotten.
This election is the moment of truth, and in the moment of truth, Savage is betraying us. This proves that giving this huge platform to opportunistic and dishonest frauds like Savage does not help the conservative cause. In fact, giving Savage this huge platform on the radio is VERY DANGEROUS. He has his own twisted agenda, and his actions can now lead to an Obama victory, which in turn can lead to the murder of millions of innocent people from an Iranian nuclear terrorist holocaust.
Chaim, I of course agree with you 110%, but I want to take this time to ask you to support me now. For as long as I have been here, I have been warning forum members against the homosexual kapo Michael Faggot--enlightening people about his once uber-liberal views, his highly probable sexual relationship with out-and-proud homosexual Allen Ginsberg, his sexual encounter with a young Polynesian man, his viciously anti-Israel comments (that he retracted as soon as it became clear his listeners weren't buying them), his defense of Islam, his public denigration of his own Judaism (when he brags about eating ham and cheese sandwiches), and his support for the wetback invasion--not to mention how he constantly rips us off--and for the most part all I have gotten in response is abuse. It seems like some people here think Michael Faggot is just as worthy a conservative force as this movement is, and I can't understand that. Why is it so taboo here to denounce the worthless lowlife effeminate Michael Faggot?
From day one, I have stood behind you every step of the way in denouncing this piece of hog excrement. Michael Faggot is a threat to the conservative movement, a threat to the United States, and a mortal danger to the free world. Michael Faggot is about as right-wing as he is Jewish, and he's about as Jewish as his hero, Sheik Nasrallah, is. Not too many forum members have completely, and without any reservation, agreed with you 100% on Michael Faggot. I am one of them, and so are Cosmokramer and DownwithIslam. Beyond that, there may be a couple others, but the majority have defended him at least at some point. I never have, Chaim, and lots of people have gotten mad at me because of that--because I will not suck the tuchis of this perverse drain of the universe's oxygen.
Now, as for your point--I can tell you why he wants Obama to win, plain and simple. First off, he's a self-hating kapo k**e, and therefore the most important mitzvot in his religion is to fall down and worship the Negro. Secondly, as a probable homosexual, he is likely attracted to Obama. However, most importantly, he is probably being paid to do this by the ultra-flush Obama campaign. People like Dykael Faggot only care about money. Faggot would accept money from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (yimach schmo) if he offered it. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if that is why he accused Israel of committing atrocities in 2006. I am 99% certain that there is a financial motive behind this, Chaim.
In closing, I'd like for you to defend me when I speak the truth about Michael Faggot. Oh, and one last thing: yimach schmo to Michael Faggot. >:(
Chaimfan
This is exactly the 100% truth, C.F. and Chaim convinced me from the start about what this "Michael Savage" guy really did and was about. Now, Savage is endangering this country and advocating the Black muSSlim Nazi for change! >:(
Anyways, C.F. said the truth, G-d Bless. O0
-
Well,
You can be correct and remove the anger. Anger is not so good especially if it doesnt result in any change. I dont think one should throw around curses and namecalling in order to prove a point. Actually adding the namecalling and curses makes one believe that the writer is the one with the issues.
Whether Savage is good or bad will be determined. I dont listen to him and could care less about what he says because it doesnt impact me. If he is leading people astray then he is guilty of a grave sin. It is in Hashems hands how to deal with this individual.
It is a thin line we must tread in our retaining our righteousness without alienating those still on the fence. The only way we can bring light into the world is if our world view is not radical {black & white} and we are tolerant of difference of opinion. Once again I defer to the Machlokes of Hillel & Shammai.
muman613
-
Chaim,
Thank you very much for responding and making clear what our movement's position on the fraud Michael Weiner is. As to your one disagreement with me--I am more than happy to stop calling him "Michael Faggot", for the good of the movement, but I do think there is legitimate evidence to suggest that he may be a closeted homosexual--such as his bizarrely close friendship with out-and-proud gay Allen Ginsberg and his occasionally obvious effeminate mannerisms. Chaim, I will stop if you would prefer that I not use this term, but it is my opinion that Savage is a closeted homosexual. If you are interested, I can work on compiling a thread with all of the combined rumors and evidence that he is. Surely you have to wonder why gay rumors do not follow other conservafrauds like Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Hannity, Coulter, etc. around, but only Savage.
As for Muman and others--no, of course I don't think having an interest in poodles makes somebody gay--I like cats, so someone could probably say the same thing about me, but I take it as one out of myriad suspicious factors in his life and conduct that warrrant critical examination. Muman, I am profoundly sorry for your marital problems (which, thank HaShem, have been resolved), but I do think that a pattern of marital problems in someone's life often says something about the individual.
Chaimfan.
-
I will ALSO add that in one of your previous posts TO ME today, you just about accused ME almost of being ANTI-SEMITIC, THAT, is one reason, Sir- that I will not EVER post to one more of YOUR posts, EVER again. ---THAT IS DISGUSTING, considering I am a Crypto-Jewess-- NEVER in MY life, have I had to read such veiled ACCUSATIONS about MYSELF like you did today CF. EVER. Me, ANTI SEMITIC?? MY G-d, man!!!! SELL CRAZY somewhere ELSE!!!
Paulette, this is uncalled for and I am ashamed of you. I know full well that you are a proud Jew. You know exactly what I said. I stated that to argue that it is the fault of "women in high places" that we are fighting an ineffective, mamby-pamby war in Iraq is similar to the anti-Semitic tactic that argues that it is "Jews in high places" that have made this country liberal.
Whether or not you want to reply to anything I write anymore is your choice, but you owe me an apology.
-
C.F., you are one the true greats on this forum. Maybe you should refer to Savage a metrosexual, a more appropriate term perhaps. O0
-
C.F., you are one the true greats on this forum. Maybe you should refer to Savage a metrosexual, a more appropriate term perhaps. O0
Or even a Bisexual
-
Or a Savagette.
-
I suppose I could call him "Michael Maggot", which is also very appropriate. But there is evidence to believe that my original nickname for him is warranted.
-
C.F., you are one the true greats on this forum. Maybe you should refer to Savage a metrosexual, a more appropriate term perhaps. O0
Wow! wow! wow!
I am an open metrosexual, since I remember myself, always was. :) I was born that way - always like to dress well and look good. To me the word metrosexual has no negative connotation. Since when, actually, gay people have a monopoly on taste and manners!? Since when straight guys MUST look like slobs to prove their masculinity?! It is a recent phenomenon - perhaps media wants to show gays as uber cool while most of them wear drek and look absolutely putrid.
-
If I offended any mertosexuals, I apologize.
-
If I offended any mertosexuals, I apologize.
I took it in good spirit - no offense taken, of course! But you see the point I was making?
-
Indeed. Sometimes things get heated up here. I'm a metro too. I feel so relieved! O0
-
I will ALSO add that in one of your previous posts TO ME today, you just about accused ME almost of being ANTI-SEMITIC, THAT, is one reason, Sir- that I will not EVER post to one more of YOUR posts, EVER again. ---THAT IS DISGUSTING, considering I am a Crypto-Jewess-- NEVER in MY life, have I had to read such veiled ACCUSATIONS about MYSELF like you did today CF. EVER. Me, ANTI SEMITIC?? MY G-d, man!!!! SELL CRAZY somewhere ELSE!!!
Paulette, this is uncalled for and I am ashamed of you. I know full well that you are a proud Jew. You know exactly what I said. I stated that to argue that it is the fault of "women in high places" that we are fighting an ineffective, mamby-pamby war in Iraq is similar to the anti-Semitic tactic that argues that it is "Jews in high places" that have made this country liberal.
Whether or not you want to reply to anything I write anymore is your choice, but you owe me an apology.
Paulette, this is uncalled for! CF never insinuated anything of sort. This is a very old cheating tactic in the debate - "turn the table" - comment on the illustration not on the point that your opponent made. The illustration was of course anti-Semites accusations, but the point, and it was very clear, was Stereotyping of women! Women gave us Margaret Thatcher, Queen Victoria, Empress Elizabeth the Great, etc. From what I can see, Ms. Palin has the right stuff to become, with time, an iron lady of America - a great president.
And finally, you and Scriabin must know that men are as guilty, if not more guilty, than women of the disastrous feminism movement.
-
Indeed. Sometimes things get heated up here. I'm a metro too. I feel so relieved! O0
All right! Ping me when you see Prada shoes on sale, size 11.
Hugo Boss rules! :::D
-
Shoes rally aren't my thing. But I spend a King's ransom on hair care products. O0
-
(http://forumspile.com/That-Is-Disgusting-Radio.jpg) :::D :::D :::D :::D :::D
-
Shoes rally aren't my thing. But I spend a King's ransom on hair care products. O0
I do the whole thing - shoes, watches, suits, apparel, haircut. Thank G-d for www.bluefly.com! O0
-
Shoes rally aren't my thing. But I spend a King's ransom on hair care products. O0
I do the whole thing - shoes, watches, suits, apparel, haircut. Thank G-d for www.bluefly.com! O0
That is a nice site I have ordered from them a couple of times
-
Chaim,
Thank you very much for responding and making clear what our movement's position on the fraud Michael Weiner is. As to your one disagreement with me--I am more than happy to stop calling him "Michael Faggot", for the good of the movement, but I do think there is legitimate evidence to suggest that he may be a closeted homosexual--such as his bizarrely close friendship with out-and-proud gay Allen Ginsberg and his occasionally obvious effeminate mannerisms. Chaim, I will stop if you would prefer that I not use this term, but it is my opinion that Savage is a closeted homosexual. If you are interested, I can work on compiling a thread with all of the combined rumors and evidence that he is. Surely you have to wonder why gay rumors do not follow other conservafrauds like Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Hannity, Coulter, etc. around, but only Savage.
As for Muman and others--no, of course I don't think having an interest in poodles makes somebody gay--I like cats, so someone could probably say the same thing about me, but I take it as one out of myriad suspicious factors in his life and conduct that warrrant critical examination. Muman, I am profoundly sorry for your marital problems (which, thank HaShem, have been resolved), but I do think that a pattern of marital problems in someone's life often says something about the individual.
Chaimfan.
I accept you apology CF. Poofyfoopoopkins was just the best poodle I ever had, and I just get the sniffles and a little teary eyed when people don't seem to understand us poodle lovers.
(http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e290/karlique/webkinzpinkpoodle.jpg)
-
Chaim,
Thank you very much for responding and making clear what our movement's position on the fraud Michael Weiner is. As to your one disagreement with me--I am more than happy to stop calling him "Michael Faggot", for the good of the movement, but I do think there is legitimate evidence to suggest that he may be a closeted homosexual--such as his bizarrely close friendship with out-and-proud gay Allen Ginsberg and his occasionally obvious effeminate mannerisms. Chaim, I will stop if you would prefer that I not use this term, but it is my opinion that Savage is a closeted homosexual. If you are interested, I can work on compiling a thread with all of the combined rumors and evidence that he is. Surely you have to wonder why gay rumors do not follow other conservafrauds like Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Hannity, Coulter, etc. around, but only Savage.
As for Muman and others--no, of course I don't think having an interest in poodles makes somebody gay--I like cats, so someone could probably say the same thing about me, but I take it as one out of myriad suspicious factors in his life and conduct that warrrant critical examination. Muman, I am profoundly sorry for your marital problems (which, thank HaShem, have been resolved), but I do think that a pattern of marital problems in someone's life often says something about the individual.
Chaimfan.
I accept you apology CF. Poofyfoopoopkins was just the best poodle I ever had, and I just get the sniffles and a little teary eyed when people don't seem to understand us poodle lovers.
(http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e290/karlique/webkinzpinkpoodle.jpg)
(http://art.uwstout.edu/images/sad-face.jpg)
-
Thank you Americanhero, I can tell you are a sensitive guy.
-
In my opinion, we should stick to the indisputable fact that Savage is now sabotaging the McCain-Palin ticket. I think that calling Savage a "faggot" undermines our argument. I have known Jews like Savage, and I do not get the impression that he is a homosexual. In any event, without real evidence, making this accusation harms our credibility.
Exactly. I agree.
And CF, this was exactly what I have been saying in response to your diatribes. I never defended Savage's political views or called him a great guy. It is wise to avoid slander and speculative material. Stick to the facts. That's all I have asked for.
-
I will ALSO add that in one of your previous posts TO ME today, you just about accused ME almost of being ANTI-SEMITIC, THAT, is one reason, Sir- that I will not EVER post to one more of YOUR posts, EVER again. ---THAT IS DISGUSTING, considering I am a Crypto-Jewess-- NEVER in MY life, have I had to read such veiled ACCUSATIONS about MYSELF like you did today CF. EVER. Me, ANTI SEMITIC?? MY G-d, man!!!! SELL CRAZY somewhere ELSE!!!
Paulette, this is uncalled for and I am ashamed of you. I know full well that you are a proud Jew. You know exactly what I said. I stated that to argue that it is the fault of "women in high places" that we are fighting an ineffective, mamby-pamby war in Iraq is similar to the anti-Semitic tactic that argues that it is "Jews in high places" that have made this country liberal.
Whether or not you want to reply to anything I write anymore is your choice, but you owe me an apology.
I owe you ZERO.
-
C.F. I think you should apologize to Paulette for not being sensitive to her background when you made that kind of analogy.
-
Flame me if you will, but CF, your outward facing anger is so great that sometimes it reflects back inwards towards your allies. Attack is a pretty strong word, maybe bickering is more appropriate. There is a big difference between petty bickering and debating. The forum members should never attack each other. That is exactly what our enemies want. There have been times when I could have felt offended by comments or statements but I just shrugged it off.
We have a fantastic forum here. Even if you took the battle against Obama and Islam out of it, the opportunity for two great religions with a common foundation to debate, communicate, and build understanding and an alliance is just phenomenal. It proves we can coexist in a peaceful and healthy environment. A lot of times Americanhero and I will inject some humor in a thread and many of you think we are just being silly idiots, well what we are displaying is exactly how the bickering looks.
Like an earlier post stated, it is our duty to just ignore some things if it doesn't contribute to the overall initiatives.
-
C.F., you are one the true greats on this forum. Maybe you should refer to Savage a metrosexual, a more appropriate term perhaps. O0
Or even a Bisexual
Call him Michael Sewage. That's a good pun.
C.F.'s 'puns' are always witless and lame.
-
Flame me if you will, but CF, your outward facing anger is so great that sometimes it reflects back inwards towards your allies. There have been times when I could have felt offended by comments or statements but I just shrugged it off.
Our enemies could use the following quote from Rabbi Kahane against C.F.:
"Let him speak because he's winning votes for us."
-
I owe you ZERO.
Suit yourself. You have the right not to apologize, just like I have the right to critique your views just like anybody else's. The kinds of stereotypes you have against women are LIKE the stereotypes many have about Jews. I didn't say that means YOU don't like Jews. Understand that much please.
-
I owe you ZERO.
Suit yourself. You have the right not to apologize, just like I have the right to critique your views just like anybody else's. The kinds of stereotypes you have against women are LIKE the stereotypes many have about Jews. I didn't say that means YOU don't like Jews. Understand that much please.
Paulette is correct.
-
I owe you ZERO.
Suit yourself. You have the right not to apologize, just like I have the right to critique your views just like anybody else's. The kinds of stereotypes you have against women are LIKE the stereotypes many have about Jews. I didn't say that means YOU don't like Jews. Understand that much please.
This is an absurd comparison.
-
Oh, really? It's wrong to point out that saying "we are losing the war in Iraq because of too many women in high places" is exactly like how anti-Semites say similar things of Jewish politicians and authorities? Checked out lately what Buchanan, Ron Paul, Sobran etc. have wrote of Wolfowitz, Perle, Albright, etc. and other "neocons"?
Of course Paulette is not an anti-Semite, but in this issue, the stereotyping of an entire group, and blaming it for a whole range of problems that it can't possibly be responsible for, is a shared tactic. There are violent misogynists out there, such as Muslims and Muslim sympathizers such as adam613, whose view of women is very similar to how anti-Semites view Jews. Paulette doesn't have to apologize, and neither do I. The difference is that I made no insults or character attacks. I only criticized the position.
-
From where i stand, Sarah Palin has more balls that all McCain, Obama and Biden combined. This women has endured more criticism and smears in two weeks than Obama has in nearly 2 years of infomercial coverage.
-
Is it ok to say balls? 8;)
-
Is it ok to say balls? 8;)
(http://media.kbmt12.com/images/Baseballs.bmp)
-
Is it ok to say balls? 8;)
(http://media.kbmt12.com/images/Baseballs.bmp)
LOL. Would you prefer cajones?
-
She's tough but not as tough as McCain. I doubt she could go through what he went through in the Hanoi Hilton and still have a mind. The man is a phenomenon. I had no idea what he'd gone through until they started to detail some of it for the public recently.
-
Is it ok to say balls? 8;)
(http://media.kbmt12.com/images/Baseballs.bmp)
LOL. Would you prefer cajones?
something like that ;D
-
If Savage isn't doing it, it's definitly possible that someone in the future could pretend to be a right wing talk show host and then reveal he is not and say how stupid all his listeners were. Something like Borat.