JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Chaim Ben Pesach on November 07, 2008, 12:39:06 AM
-
בס''ד
This is an important poll because we will not take a stand on the 2012 presidential race unless a majority of JTFers approve.
So please vote and if you can explain your vote with a post, that will also be helpful.
I personally support Sarah Palin for president, and I believe that we must organize now to take over the Republican party in 2012. Barry Goldwater won the 1964 Republican presidential nomination because his supporters started organizing immediately after the 1960 presidential election. And Ronald Reagan won the GOP nomination in 1980 for the same reason - the Reagan supporters started organizing immediately after the 1976 presidential election. If we start so far in advance, we may be able to play a serious role in the process and may be able to attract many conservative Palin supporters to our movement, G-d willing.
On the other hand, starting early is risky. It is hard to know what will happen in the next four years. Some other candidate may emerge that seems better - I doubt it, but anything is possible. If that happens, then we would have to change course. Also, while this may bring us many Palin supporters, it may turn off many others who do not like Palin or who doubt that she is electable or who consider her to be unqualified.
The choice is yours, JTFers. I say let's take a chance. But I could be wrong.
-
I think it's to early. People will get over saturated with Palin if it's too early. She is a good candidate, though.
-
I say yes.
1. She has proven to have energized conservatives beyond a doubt. Huge money flowed in to the mccain campaign after she was picked. Huge crowds gathered for HER speeches.
2. She is an excellent human being who puts G-d first, has great judgment, great character, a love for America, Israel, etc. and is a great, sharp executive, who actually walks the walk. (or in her case, RUNS the walk!) In my opinion, she is one of the best types of Christians.
3. Precisely BECAUSE she is such a threat to the left, the left is trying to destroy her. She is a threat to the fat cat corrupt RINO establishment types (which by the way includes mccain). In other words, the more someone is viciously attacked by the media, the more you can rely on them to be very powerful against the left. Take Ann Coulter: she has been demonized, and yet still comes back with book after best-selling book. The truth may hurt the left, but it is still the truth! And republicans should take note that if the american people want to vote for a democrat, they will do so by voting for a democrat with a d next to their name, not an R like what is facetiously next to mccain's name.
4. She has inspired young conservatives and even moderates. Those (young and old) who haven't been inspired by her have yet to hear her or get to know her. They will also be inspired and follow.
5. She is an excellent, attractive communicator who is genuine and accessible.
6. She already has a huge following as she has been exposed to America already. She is very able to clear up misconceptions about her qualifications during the next year and can build up more support by 2012.
7. She is a woman, a loving wife and a mother of five. A true American.
8. She was held back by the defeatist-mccain campaign and we were partially prevented from seeing and hearing the true Sarah Palin who is even BETTER than the great Palin of 08.
Of course I am also open for suggestions on who else can be a conservative leader for 2012, but none come to mind.
-
Sarah Palin is popular and has otherwise apolitical people coming to her defense.
These are a sample of the pro-Sarah Palin comments from a totally apolitical HOLLYWOOD website.
Jim Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 03:48 AM EST
"Sarah is not only unbelievably and palpably sexy, she is honest and the real deal."
Petie R. Peterson Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 03:43 AM EST "Tina Fey is a loser and is jealous of Sarah Palin in every respect. In other words, Sarah is everything Tina would like to be but will never be."
Lemmie Q. Quigg Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 03:40 AM EST
"Sarah has the left spooked like crazy!
You go, girl!"
Jan Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 01:18 AM EST
"The Sarah Palin you saw in the national media is not the REAL Sarah Palin we know and love here in Alaska. I really like her, and I am ashamed of any woman who cannot view Sarah as a human being with a different opinion. I am pro-life, pro-gun ownership, and all sorts of other "pros". There are a LOT of people who think the way I do. And I don't bash any liberal women who want to have abortions or gay marriages. Let me have my views... and a candidate who shares them. If you don't like the message, fine - but back off the attack already."
BJ Franks Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 02:13 PM EST
"Sarah Palin is a class act. It is unfortunate people did not appreciate her as a person, but rather fodder for their cannons. So sad.
To quote from "YOUR future president's wife" --- but with my own
spin on it...
This is the first time in my life I am NOT proud to be an American.
God bless America and Sarah Palin."
Franky L Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 01:31 PM EST
"It is hysterical to listen to you libs and your absolute terror at someone like Sarah ever getting a foothold in national politics. You take the words and policies of a proven sexual deviant like Barney Frank, and hold them in higher regard than a woman that has stood on moral principle in the face of their own challenges, and has had the strength and ability to fight major corporations for the benefit of the people that hired her, and win.. Pathetic is too kind a word for you...."
-
Shalom Chaim and all of JTF,
My opinion is that it is still too early to know what the political situation will be like in 2012. It is good to get an early start but we need to see how Obama is going to act. It is such a great unknown at this time that I think we should see what exactly we need to run against. I myself like Palin but still dont know enough to make the choice on whether she should be the president. I am sure that she will develop her political character in the next few months. My recommendation is to wait to see what the political reality of the situation is, at least for six months. Of course this is only my opinion... ;)
muman613
-
http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=213653 (http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=213653)
-
I voted yes to supporting her. It is true that it may be too early, at least we will have more than two months to get to know her. We can use her as an example of what a Republican should be. If there are any other possible candidates, at least we can compare them to Sarah Palin. I just hope that she would want the job, considering what the scumbag media put her and her family through.
-
Since the media was her greatest enemy, she should be making statements about this. Palin at the GOP convention was the best I've seen a candidate since Reagan. I felt like she was sabotaged and held herself back when she was interviewed by the press. I think it depends on how she acts now. She obviously needs to be with her family but its only been a few months. She should go on the right wing talk show circuit and say what she thinks. People love the truth and if she sounded off it would really help her come out of her shell.
Right now she is again being defined by her enemies.
The mainstream press would cover what she says, especially if she talked about media bias.
She has nothing to lose and everything to gain by doing this.
She needs to be coached on all the issues for a while because she obviously learns quickly.
She should NEVER, EVER go on that stupid SNL show and not be nice about it
-
I voted yes the communist media and the weasels around MC CAIN ARE NOW BLAMING HER FOR THEIR INCOMPETENT CAMPAIGN.I'M NOT BLAMING MC CAIN BUT SOME OF HIS ADVISORS.MC CAIN WAS'NT MY FIRST CHOICE BUT AT LEAST HE WAS CLOSE TO A REPUGNENT REPUBLICAN,I'M A CONSERVATIVE.
-
I like her and I want her to be president.
The Democratic candidate WILL be Barack Hussein Obama, so we do know what we're running against. He's probably going to be the most liberal president ever. Conservatives will be aching for someone like Sarah, and once the rest of the country sees that Obama's left-wing policies haven't really helped them much, they might be willing to give Sarah a chance.
She's got good looks, a great personality that will appeal to average Americans, a compelling personal story, and has walked the walk, not just talked the talk, on her convictions.
Her history of fighting corruption will be a huge asset, we should play this up as much as possible.
She's already run a national campaign, so all the dirt is already out on her. It's time for her to be politically active now and it's time for us to prop her up and help her.
-
I voted no because she doesn't have experience,she would granted amnesty to illegals,no military background,looks to soft,no anger behind her statement,no business background(like Romney which i support for 2012) and no to another affirmative action president.The only woman i would support would be with military background.
-
No, because there are more qualified candidates out there.
-
There are a lot of things about Palin's I like, and right now she is the only candidate for the Republican party I feel comfortable with. I still think we should look for other possibilities. I see a couple of possible drawbacks on putting Palin in the White House. One is her skit on Saturday Night Live. I think it was a big mistake because now the left is mercilessly making fun of her. This may cause mainstream Americans not to take her seriously. She doesn't seem to have an edge to her. What I mean by this is she doesn't come across as someone you don't want to mess with. Reagan and Gulianni had that edge. Another possible problem is that dictators like Akmenijahd, Kim Soong Ill, Vladimir Putin, the Saudis, Chinese, and others may see this persona in Palin as a green light, mistaking kindness for weakness. These are only possible drawbacks and Palin should definitely be given a chance to prove herself. I know McCain's people told her not to say a thing during the campaign, so there is a lot of things about her we don't know yet.
-
No. Too early.
-
no, if she ran she would lose in a similar fashion to the way McCain lost this time around. Just about all the votes McCain got were probably votes for Palin. It was clearly not enough to win. Things might be different in 4 years, however.
-
Too soon...but we can do a little bit..
Let's look around for more young go getters
-
No. The media smear campaign has weakened her chances. They will not stop the assault. We saw the same thing with Guiliani this past election. Bobby Jindal and Mike Huckabee are in my opinin the two best picks as of now.
-
I voted no because she doesn't have experience,she would granted amnesty to illegals,no military background,looks to soft,no anger behind her statement,no business background(like Romney which i support for 2012) and no to another affirmative action president.The only woman i would support would be with military background.
But almost all American leaders with military experiences participated in war against the Serbs.
-
No. Too early.
Heard this before.
-
No. The media smear campaign has weakened her chances. They will not stop the assault. We saw the same thing with Guiliani this past election. Bobby Jindal and Mike Huckabee are in my opinin the two best picks as of now.
That's why she needs to get out there, attack the media, and refute these false stories.
Jindal: very young, possible VP material for Sarah
Huckabee: a complete joke, I think everybody realizes that by now
Hunter: possible, but lacks the visibility, charisma, and uniting factor--maybe VP material
-
No. Too early.
Scriabin, we already know what you think of women; it's nothing new.
We all know how you feel about yourself, too.
You little schmuck.
-
no, if she ran she would lose in a similar fashion to the way McCain lost this time around. Just about all the votes McCain got were probably votes for Palin. It was clearly not enough to win. Things might be different in 4 years, however.
No, because Palin would be actually running to win, unlike McCain.
-
I say yes, Chaim, without hesitation. Sarah Palin is the only candidate who will energize the Republican base, and she is the only mainstream candidate who actually will want to win and will fight to at all costs. There are very few candidates out there--unlike Democrats, conservatives can't rise out of nowhere and be appointed savior of the country overnight by the media.
The only other possible candidates:
Huckabee--clearly a joke; he's as leftist as McCain, I think you can see that by now
Hunter--not bad, but not well-known and not charismatic--unlikely to electrify the GOP (he might make a good VP pick for Sarah though)
Jindal--too young (might make a good VP pick though, like Hunter)
Tancredo--single-issue candidates never get far, plus the immigration issue has been a losing one for the past two elections
Romney--showed he couldn't get it done this time around despite all the money in the world, plus he's not genuinely conservative
Cantor--not enough experience, plus the fact that he would be a Jewish leader in the diaspora--might make a good VP candidate, though
-
I think Huckabee is our guy but I will stand by JTF no matter what. I think JTF has the Jews Best Intrests at heart
-
I voted no. It's too early.
Osama hasn't even been inaugurated yet. We will have to endure 4 years of Osama and Demonrat 'leadership'.
Let's wait and see how Palin measures up to the challenges, trials and tribulations that surely lie ahead.
It's true the early bird catches the worm, but JTF should be vigilant against prematurely supporting anyone. At first glance, Palin does seem like a decent candidate--but let's wait and see--let's find out more about exactly who she is and what she stands for.
Let's see what Palin has to say when Osama starts pressuring Israel to commit suicide. Palin will have plenty of time to distinguish herself as a candidate worthy of our support. Or it might turn out she isn't what we're looking for. Time will tell. There's absolutely no reason to jump the gun on this one.
-
We should wait to learn more about her...There may be someone just as good if not better...But she deos have real potential...
-
I say yes, cause of her being a female and has youth and if you add Jindal in it you may spark both base with the conservative wing in the party, sorry cant go with Huckabee I am tired of the RINOS it is time to shift back to the right
-
We need Karl Rove back.
He was able to politically off Gore, Kerry, Dan Rather and Anne Richards.
I wish they would dig up more skeltons in more of these leftists closets'. You know the reason they scream about wiretaps is that they are looking at child porn and other sick things online.
-
I agree about Rowe. He's a weasel, but that's what you need in politics.
-
Too early. I agree. Lets wait and see.
-
I liked her speech on the Repblic National Convention. After that, on international and geo-politics she seemed very bad in my point of view. Maybe she will improve the next four years. But until now, I don't 100% support her.
-
Because it will be hard to predict the outcome of the 2012 Republican primary, we should hedge our are bets and back both Sarah Palin and Bobby Jindal. This combination of race/gender is essential to the GOP's ability to compete in future elections against B. Hussein.
-
This is good we are discussing Sarah's candidacy now. She doesn't have to start campaigning, but she is definitely a great choice. I think its shoddy what the McCain campaign did to make it look like it was her fault they lost.
They lost because McCain refused to go after Obama on the truth. Sarah was a shining Beacon for the Conservatives. She took all the slander with good humor, and came out fighting. People with children of special needs just loved her, and Trigg. She is also right about Drill Baby Drill, and Mine baby Mine. We need to get off foreign terrorist oil!!!!! Actually Sarah as governor of Alaska could appoint herself as Senator Palin, if Ted Stevens has to resign because of bad behavior. She would then have 4 years as a US Senator. ya think the left will finally admit she has enough experience?
Lets hope we all have enough money to support ourselves, after Obama gets his policies instated, and we are over taxed..... "Go Sarah" and Who will be the VP? Did anyone think about this yet?
-
No, because there are more qualified candidates out there.
I'm interested. Name some.
-
How about Michael Reagan http://www.reaganaction.com and Sarah Palin?
-
I voted no.
I think Sarah Palin is not liberal (in the real meaning of this term) enough.
In my oppinion it is neccessary to estabish a natural economic and social order. In this order, different Christian and Jewish communities can live together without struggeling, because everybody would drink it's own cup of tea.
I saw the video in her church with the black preacher. He said, that he would like to see when the Christians would conquer the economic sector and Palin says nothing against it. She did the opposite and prayed with him for political power.
But it has never worked this way.
We have to divide, godly and earthly.
If we don't, it will destroy us both. (Christians and Jews).
Althrough she is better than the socialist Democrates, who wants to enforce a godless order on us all, she is only misguided.
-
Those of us who lost out big-time through US policy in southern Africa will be cool to say the least towards a candidate who believed that Africa was just one country. Still, I guess that total ignorance is better than partial knowledge, which we all knew was the dangerous thing.
-
I voted no because she doesn't have experience,she would granted amnesty to illegals,no military background,looks to soft,no anger behind her statement,no business background(like Romney which i support for 2012) and no to another affirmative action president.The only woman i would support would be with military background.
But almost all American leaders with military experiences participated in war against the Serbs.
Let's no argue with each other why but just lets see how we support.It's true about the war but i would preferred anyway women with military background.
-
Way too early. You don't even know if she will be a candidate in 2012. She might decide to devote her time to her family (remember she has an infant with Downs Syndrome).
-
Chaim and everyone, I feel strongly that we should support Governor Sarah Palin for President in the 2012 election. I agree with what Chaim said on this week's " Ask JTF " program, that a proactive approach with our support for Gov. Palin is the best course of action.
Governor Palin has the type of values that help represent what JTF stands for. She has inspired me for multiple reasons. Her ability to draw large crowds to her recent V.P campaign speeches was evident. Also, Gov. Palin's presence on the 2008 Ticket was the difference in many, including myself, financially supporting the McCain campaign. Gov. Palin's popularity, name recognition, and National campaign experience all are positives.
Regardless of who emerges as the 2012 Republican Nominee, most of the American media is going to be biased against the candidate. Hence, why not go with the person ( viable option ) who represents JTF's standards the best, with the added plus that she already is very popular amongst Conservatives.
-
I agree with Chaim's proposal... Let's get behind Sarah Palin all the way!
-
In late 2007, we had many people who wanted JTF to support Duncan Hunter and/or Tom Tancredo for president. Hunter and Tancredo were both getting only 1% or 2% support in the polls, yet people here were willing to go with them.
I said that Tancredo would pull out before any votes are cast (which is what happened) and that Hunter would indeed get only 1% of the vote as the polls were indicating (which also happened).
If people were willing to go with candidates who were getting only 1% among Republican voters, then surely it is not too much of a leap to go with Sarah Palin, who according to the usually accurate Rasmussen poll, is getting 64% of Republican voters supporting her for the GOP nomination.
It's true that we would be taking a chance. I believe that Palin will run for president in 2012. She may not succeed, but at least she has a realistic shot. I think we should try to become an early force on her behalf so that we can influence what happens.
In any event, if I can't convince a substantial majority of JTFers to go along with this, then we won't do it. Right now, most JTFers are voting for the two "no" options. If this becomes the final result, then we will just have to do something else for now other than launch a Palin campaign.
-
Huckabee is the Man! Chaim was right from the beginning.
Palin is happy to go home.
-
Yes.
I like Sarah Palin and I think we should support her for President in 2012!
-
Don't know where Palin
stands on illegal immigration.
Other than that ...I personally support her...
but not sure if JTF should take a position yet.
-
Shalom Chaim and Everyone,
I certainly don't want to oppose your better wisdom. I think it is wise to be able to see the future and see that Sarah Palin is the President in 2012. I could see it and if you think that JTF can afford to take such a chance, then I certainly support your ideas. You have been right about a lot of issues and I pretty much trust your better judgement. If you personally feel that Palin has what is needed then let us go and do it.
Thank you,
muman613
-
I think Palin would be a great president and yes, it could really help our movement to support her. So I think we should do it. I can't imagine how she could win seeing how the media has treated her, but it is worth a shot.
I don't like the idea of splitting the forum though.
-
Perhaps many of the people who vote that it is too early to decide have not ruled out Palin, they are simply waiting for other potential leaders. Therefore those votes should not be considered anti-Palin.
Also, this evening Palin will be interviewed on Fox by Greta, 10pm Eastern time.
-
I think people need to get over the upset that Obama won as best we can and start looking to the future now! Palin is a great choice for us!
-
Chaim, I think it's time we get onboard the Sarah train, now. A majority of JTFers support you in this idea; we will never have 100% unanimity. What's more is that the people who don't agree with this mostly disagree only on the issue of timing, not character. This is not a repeat of when JTF endorsed Huckabee this winter. The vast majority of JTFers like what they see in Sarah Palin based on what they know.
-
I spent about three hours watching Sarah Palin being interviewed and I can emphatically say that yes we should start a grassroots effort to support her for President in 2012. When she was in a more relaxed setting with Sean Hannity on Fox News she conducted herself well, she was articulate, she was on point with her answers and she certainly didn't come across as the "idiot" that the establishment media has attempted to make her out to be. I'm enamored by her core principles. She's not 100% where I'd like her to be on Israel, but hopefully we can work to persuade her to change her position.
-
The best part about her, she is not part of that Washington elitest group of animals. She has tremendous ability to lead as you see with her being a Gov. So already she has executive expirience. She runs in '12 I will without question support her. And lets fight the media dogs that will do once again anything they can to try to bury her cause they are afraid of her.
-
Yes. the washington elite had better get themselves behind Palin.
The PEOPLE OF AMERICA love her, and the last time I checked, there are more regular patriotic Americans than there are washington elite.
Also, we know Palin is not afraid to fire people who are useless or dangerous.
-
She's not 100% where I'd like her to be on Israel, but hopefully we can work to persuade her to change her position.
I think we all know that she said what she felt like she had to say--either what the McCain ghouls told her to say, or what she thinks Israel itself advocates--probably both. I doubt that she truly supports the "two state solution" in her heart.
-
I agree. She is the type of Christian from everything that I've seen and read, that loves and is dedicated to Israel. She's the type of Christian that actually believes what she says she believes, and does not waiver, make excuses, or act in a politically expedient way. She will be a steadfast defender of Israel, in my opinion.
-
Chaim,
You're right. I actually changed my mind. JTF could be in the news and the spotlight if Palin is supported now that she is still in the spotlight..
-
Way too early on this one. Most of us were angry and jacked after the election and our focus was too far down the road, me as guilty as anyone. Palin will soon vanish and we just have to see what the next four years brings us. But I have no doubt that we haven't seen the last of Mrs. Palin.
-
I honestly do not think Sarah Palin would be a strong candidate. I mean I love her but half of the American people still don't know her and dont think she is knowledgable enough to run the country. I like Newt Gingrich. I am not THAT knowledgable about him yet but I like what I hear so far a lot on his Americansolutions website.. He seems to make sense to me and is a good speaker. I think he would make a strong candidate for the republican party.
-
Newt Gingrich over Palin? Even the media would side with Palin.
-
No, Its too early. Even though she is really appealing to JTF, you never will know what can happen in 4 years.
-
Like I mentioned earlier in this thread, Sarah Palin is clearly the person who I want to see get elected President in 2012. And who I hope JTF elects to support ASAP.
Regarding Newt Gingrich, one thing that could work against him was something that some voters factored into their decision regarding rejecting John McCain. Gingrich will be 69 in 2012, which is only 3 years younger than McCain's current age.
-
The best part about her, she is not part of that Washington elitest group of animals. She has tremendous ability to lead as you see with her being a Gov. So already she has executive expirience. She runs in '12 I will without question support her. And lets fight the media dogs that will do once again anything they can to try to bury her cause they are afraid of her.
Excellent post, Masterwolf. We are definitely on the same wave length.
-
I think we should give backing Plain a shot. I don't think it would be a bad thing to do. If she gains momentum in the next year or so JTF will have been one of the first movements to give her backing. I liked Palin from the first time I heard her speak this was way before she was seriously even thought of as a VP candidate. She has a straight forward quality that connects to many conservative Americans. The left wing is deadly scared of her and they have done everything to discredit her they possibly could do. Even so her ratings are still high. If she runs for President in 2012 she will be calling the shots and won't be hampered by the likes of people like McCain and the people who ran his campaign. I have been a card carrying Republican for over 30 years and Palin is one of the best people to come along in all that time. Lets not waste another day lets get moving and get some emails out to Alaska to let her know JTF is willing to work at getting her elected in 012. I think Palin is a person who will remember friends who support her and this may go a long way in making JTF a mass movement and helping Israel.
-
I say 'Yes'!
Sarah Palin has a bright future with the Conservative Republicans, I just hope we'll manage to get through these 4 years under Obama.
-
Right-Of-Center Bloggers Select Their Favorite People On The Right (2008 Edition)
Right Wing News emailed almost 260 right-of-center bloggers and asked them to send us a list of whom they considered to be their "Favorite People On The Right." Representatives from the following 44 blogs responded...
All American Blogger, Atlas Shrugs, Axis of Right, Bad Example, Blonde Sagacity, Bookworm Room, (Matt) Bull Moose Strikes Back, (Laura) Bull Moose Strikes Back, The Captain's Journal, Dr. Melissa Clouthier, Conservatism Today, Conservative Compendium, Copious Dissent, Argghhhh!, Cara Ellison, Girl On The Right, House of Eratosthenes, Paul Ibrahim.com, IMAO, Keith Burgess-Jackson, Conservative Grapevine, Jeremayakovka, Josh Schroeder, Lotus Blog, Libertarian Republican, Mean Ol' Meany , Midnight Blue, Moonbattery, mountaineer musings, Mount Virtus, Musings, My Aisling, Newsbeat1, (Shoebox) No Runny Eggs, The Nose On Your Face, Pirate's Cove, Pirates Man Your Women!, The Rougblog, Don Singleton, Take Our Country Back, Trying To Grok, Vox Popoli, WILLisms, Wolking's World
All bloggers were allowed to make anywhere from 1-12 unranked selections and were allowed to choose anybody on the right or generally perceived to be on the right that they liked: Republican, Conservative, Libertarian, politician, preacher, blogger, columnist, radio host, you name it!
Without further ado, here are the right-of-center bloggers' favorite people on the right with the number of votes beside of each selection in parentheses:
23) Michele Bachmann (4)
23) Glenn Beck (4)
23) Pat Buchanan (4)
23) Victor David Hanson (4)
23) Charles Krauthammer (4)
23) Dennis Prager (4)
23) John Roberts (4)
20) Dick Cheney (5)
20) Mark Levin (5)
20) Clarence Thomas (5)
19) Paul Ryan (6)
15) Tom Coburn (7)
15) Laura Ingraham (7)
15) Sean Hannity (7)
15) Mike Pence (7)
12) Jeff Flake (8 )
12) Jonah Goldberg (8 )
12) Antonin Scalia (8 )
11) Jim DeMint (10)
9) Ann Coulter (11)
9) Thomas Sowell (11)
7) Michael Steele (12)
7) Michelle Malkin (12)
6) Mark Steyn (13)
5) Newt Gingrich (17)
4) Fred Thompson (18)
3) Bobby Jindal (22)
2) Rush Limbaugh (29)
1) Sarah Palin (33)
http://rightwingnews.com/#post13493 (http://rightwingnews.com/#post13493)
Where's Lou Dobbs?
-
I noticed the take out king from San Fran didn't make that list.
-
Although I like her as a person, I'm not really comfortable with Sarah Palin as Presidential candidate. There were many instances where she didn't appear professional at all. Unfortenately the recent turkey interview adds to that.
I also wonder about her position and knowledge on Israel and the Middle East. She's talking about a two state solution, which means Israel having to make concession to terrorists. At the same time she claims to be a bible believing Christian, so something doesn't fit in my view. Possibly she had to talk about a two state solution due to pressure from the McCain staff, but who can say that for sure?
Hopefully, these inadequacies can be solved within 4 years.
-
If people can eat a turkey they can watch a few of them being quickly and humanely killed.
-
I want to see a Palin/Jindal ticket!
-
I support Palin! In fact a few days after she lost, I ordered PALIN 2012 buttons from Cafepress! I wear one every day, right next to my, "Not My President" button (with the Obama symbol on it, lol).
-
On VH1 best week ever the guy hosting it said "palin is talking about runnign again in 2012 , *pft as if that's possible*
And the scary thing is he might be right.
The media won't leave her alone now, imagine if she runs again they will attack her until she has no campaign.