JTF.ORG Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: EffIran on January 25, 2009, 11:08:05 AM

Title: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
Post by: EffIran on January 25, 2009, 11:08:05 AM
Who is the first private citizen/group Kirsten Gillibrand met with after being appointed senator?  That's right, you got it....Al Sharpton! 
Title: Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
Post by: DownwithIslam on January 25, 2009, 02:54:24 PM
I am not surprised. This swine is just a typical traitor democrat.
Title: Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
Post by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on January 25, 2009, 04:06:33 PM
Give her a break guys. Every single NY state politician is a disgusting whore, from both parties. They are no different from the California Republican Party, which is now supporting tax increases as part of a "comprehensive solution" to close our state's budget gap.
Title: Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
Post by: briann on January 25, 2009, 05:36:05 PM
Quote from: C.F. on January 25, 2009, 04:06:33 PM
Give her a break guys. Every single NY state politician is a disgusting whore, from both parties. They are no different from the California Republican Party, which is now supporting tax increases as part of a "comprehensive solution" to close our state's budget gap.

Isnt she supposed to be moderate?? I heard she was supportive of the 2nd ammendmant.. is this true?
Title: Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
Post by: Americanhero1 on January 25, 2009, 05:50:26 PM
Quote from: briann on January 25, 2009, 05:36:05 PM
Quote from: C.F. on January 25, 2009, 04:06:33 PM
Give her a break guys. Every single NY state politician is a disgusting whore, from both parties. They are no different from the California Republican Party, which is now supporting tax increases as part of a "comprehensive solution" to close our state's budget gap.

Isnt she supposed to be moderate?? I heard she was supportive of the 2nd ammendmant.. is this true?


Yes she supports the 2nd amendment
The Dems have already attacked her for her stance on the 2nd amendment
Title: Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
Post by: Abben on January 25, 2009, 09:16:49 PM
A gun supporter is good in my book.
Title: Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
Post by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on January 25, 2009, 09:58:33 PM
Quote from: Abben on January 25, 2009, 09:16:49 PM
A gun supporter is good in my book.
Yeah but she's horrible on all other issues. She is like Jolene Unsoeld (sp?) of Washington, who was a fanatical leftist but pro-gun.
Title: Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
Post by: Abben on January 25, 2009, 10:25:29 PM
Quote from: C.F. on January 25, 2009, 09:58:33 PM
Quote from: Abben on January 25, 2009, 09:16:49 PM
A gun supporter is good in my book.
Yeah but she's horrible on all other issues. She is like Jolene Unsoeld (sp?) of Washington, who was a fanatical leftist but pro-gun.

I didn't know that. Thanks for that info CF.
Title: Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
Post by: nessuno on January 25, 2009, 10:37:00 PM
Quote from: C.F. on January 25, 2009, 09:58:33 PM
Quote from: Abben on January 25, 2009, 09:16:49 PM
A gun supporter is good in my book.
Yeah but she's horrible on all other issues. She is like Jolene Unsoeld (sp?) of Washington, who was a fanatical leftist but pro-gun.
C.F. is right.  I heard her speak when she was running for office.