JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Chai on March 07, 2010, 10:42:54 PM
-
http://www.evilempirebook.com/
http://www.evilempirebook.com/media.php?id=9&m=03&y=2007&play=now (the vid)
The Evil Empire - 101 Ways that England Ruined the World - heading Ornamental line
* The Book
* |
* The Author
* |
* Press
* |
* Media
* |
* Contact
What is The Evil Empire?
In The Evil Empire, Steven A. Grasse exposes the secret history of England's global misdeeds. He asks what few have dared to ask: Having spent the better half of the millennium turning the world into their personal litter box, where do the English get off blaming everything on America?
After all, whose imperialistic shenanigans is Osama bin Laden really trying to avenge? Whose landgrabbing ways put the Palestinians and Israelis at each others throats? Who invented machine guns, wage slavery and concentration camps?
The closer you look at English history, the more you realize they're in no position to be pointing fingers. This outrageous indictment is sure to make blue bloods boil on both sides of the Atlantic.
Watch the Mini-documentary - banner
Newsweek Reads The Evil Empire, Asks: Did Britain Wreck The World?
Leafing through the latest edition of Newsweek, we were thoroughly delighted to come across a tremendous article… Read More...
YouTube Comments- England: Evil Empire- BBC Radio Debate Part II
Hamdaman101 If New Zealand has no native then why is the Haka still performed by the Maori's? In Canada why ar… Read More...
YouTube Comments- England: Evil Empire- More Letters from Angry Brits
apincle Uh huh. I really wouldn't be too quick to spend reparations you think you're getting from Great Britai… Read More...
Support the International Coalition for British Reparations Ornamental line British FlagCopyright 2007, Evil Empire.bullet - footerTerms & Conditionsbullet - footerRSS FeedBritish Flag The Arcadia Project
-
Does it cover the arms trades they made with the saudi's?
-
They certainly screwed up a good chunk of the world drawing lines in the sand and creating "countries".
-
YEA it does~~!!!!
-
However bad the British were, they generally got on well with the Red Indians, & had they won the American Revolution, there would be a UDA (United Dominions of America) today instead of a USA (United States of America), with a lot more Red Men in it, a breed of human almost extinct, for better or for worse, because of US American policies!
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/97/Goyaale.jpg/492px-Goyaale.jpg)
-
I'd rather deal with the British conquerors than the muslim murderers.
The British bullies your city away from you then what? They modernise it.
Way better than when muslims or others take over.
-
They were the largest (back in the 20's) but they certainly werent the most evil.
Now they suffer from liberal stupidity, which is making them ripe for the picking by Islam.
-
nothing more evil than Islamic empire though
-
nothing more evil than Islamic empire though
True :)
-
You would by far rather have wanted to be under the 13th century Muslim Ottomans than under the 13th century 'British'!
-
You would by far rather have wanted to be under the 13th century Muslim Ottomans than under the 13th century 'British'!
I think for me as a protestant Christian and for you as a Jew this could be right. Althrough I hate this stupid primitive evil arrogant sandmonkeys and I will never accept them ruling over me.
-
The British have been wicked to the Jews for many centuries... Remember that Jews were expelled from England in 1290 after a century of persecution including book burnings and lynchings.
http://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/HistoryJewishPersecution/
Modern history reveals that Britain retains its antisemitsm based on its foul treatment of Jews during the establishment of the state of Israel... Today we remember 12 jewish martyrs who were hanged by the British...
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/136403
(Israelnationalnews.com) The Knesset will hold a ceremonious session on Tuesday in memory of the Olei HaGardom – the 12 pre-State Jewish underground fighters who fought Arab attacks and the British Mandate's betrayal of the Jews and whom the British sentenced to death by hanging between 1938 and 1947.
The words Olei HaGardom mean “those who ascended (were hanged on) the gallows.” Most of them, all members of the Etzel (Irgun Zvai Leumi - National Military Organization) and Lehi (Lohamei Herut Yisrael - Fighters for the Freedom of Israel), were hanged in Acre (Akko) prison.
The Etzel and Lehi were Zionist underground groups that fought to free the Land of Israel from British rule during the 1940s.
The Knesset session will be the main commemoration during three days of special events in honor of the 12 and will be held by the Menachem Begin Heritage Center and the Uri Zvi Greenberg Legacy Center.
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Opposition Leader Tzipi Livni, whose father Eitan was a senior Etzel commander, will address the Knesset session.
The two most famous Olei HaGardom were Shlomo Ben-Yosef and Dov Gruner. Ben-Yosef was executed on June 29, 1938 (Sivan 30) after he shot at an Arab bus carrying near Tzfat in response to frequent Arab attacks against Jews in the country's north. Gruner was executed on April 16, 1947 (Nissan 26) after attacking a British police station in Ramat Gan.
The others were: Eliyahu Hakim, Eliyahu Beit-Zuri, Mordechai Alkachai, Yechiel Drezner, Eliezer Kashani, Meir Feinstein, Moshe Barazani, Yaakov Weis, Avshalom Haviv and Meir Nakar.
-
as a brit(englishmen), i find it quite regardless of our evil past how far the other way we have gone...we are now a woefully pc country...look how we welcome this muslim terrorists..
-
nothing more evil than Islamic empire though
I think what you are saying is even more relevant, coming from a Hindu.
-
as a brit(englishmen), i find it quite regardless of our evil past how far the other way we have gone...we are now a woefully pc country...look how we welcome this muslim terrorists..
So they went from traditional Christian antisemitism to Islamic antisemitism... What difference from the Jewish perspective?
-
as a brit(englishmen), i find it quite regardless of our evil past how far the other way we have gone...we are now a woefully pc country...look how we welcome this muslim terrorists..
So they went from traditional Christian antisemitism to Islamic antisemitism... What difference from the Jewish perspective?
I think that that vast majority of the brits today are great people. I can't say that for the vast majority of Muslims. Muslims are still less than 10% of Britain. And the Leftist Muslim Enablers are a minority as well. So the majority are still good people.
-
as a brit(englishmen), i find it quite regardless of our evil past how far the other way we have gone...we are now a woefully pc country...look how we welcome this muslim terrorists..
So they went from traditional Christian antisemitism to Islamic antisemitism... What difference from the Jewish perspective?
I think that that vast majority of the brits today are great people. I can't say that for the vast majority of Muslims. Muslims are still less than 10% of Britain. And the Leftist Muslim Enablers are a minority as well. So the majority are still good people.
Why do they allow the media, such as BBC, and others such as Galloway to have their way? I have seen very little support for Israel and Jews come from Britain.
PS: I know there are good English people... My first boss, when I was only 18, was a Brit... He was very nice, and I learned how to make him English Tea.
-
I'd rather deal with the British conquerors than the Muslim murderers.
The British bullies your city away from you then what? They modernise it.
Way better than when Muslims or others take over.
You don't think the British are bloody murderers? Do you know what they have done to India? infact, the Arabs are the pawns of the damn British! Who do you think created Trans-Jordan??? and other fake Arab countries? The British kind sir . Their hatred of Jews went back even before the Muslim hatred of the Jews. The British are only more cleaver in concealment. People seem to forget the crusades and even the white papers! Every place they go they take and take , they are like cockroaches.
If you are Chinese you should know what they have even done to your people with the opium ..They are evil heartless people.
-
Had Hitler invaded Britain, Oswald Mosley (Hitler was the best man at his wedding!) would have been appointed Reichsprotektor England, and he and the very many Brits who supported his Blackshirt BUF (British Union of Fascists) would have made sure that every single one of the UK's then 600,000 Jews would have been rounded up and put on the Channel ferry to Auschwitz, thereby emptying Britain out of Jews just as it was in the Expulsion of Edward I in 1290.
(http://nickmilne.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/oswald-mosley1.png)
And DON'T say it couldn't happen again!
That Hashem has allowed the white idiots of the US, UK, France, Holland, Belgium etc etc to allow in a peaceful Muslim invasion is part of G-d's plant, to ensure that the Jew doesn't get to feel too much at home among the gentiles! Now that the antisemitism caused by Christianity has been largely defanged, and the Edomites are showing a somewhat better face towards the Jew, the Ishmaelites have replaced them!
-
With no Britain there would have been no United States. I generally like British people.
-
Its britian
-
With no Britain there would have been no United States. I generally like British people.
With no Britain there would be millions of Jews saved in ww2 ..no white papers no crusades . With no Britten no take over of India no Islamic republic and Iran would have the Shah en Shah, damn those socialist commies to hell.
-
They are still occupying my land for their own greedy selfish evil ways. 800 years of war and they never said sorry to The Irish People. They caused The Famine in Ireland that led to a holocaust in Ireland which killed over a million Irish Men, Women and Children because they wouldn't convert to their Protestant religion. They also caused mass expulsion of over 5 million Irish People to America. There are so many horrible crimes they have commited throughtout the 800 years of war to my people that you could write several hundred books on. I would like an apology from The Queen for all the crimes commited at the hands of these monsters to my people, when this beast visits Ireland and I want them out of Northern Ireland. If they do that then we can talk about forgiveness. Until then they are evil Nazi's. >:( >:( >:(
-
I hear you and feel you brother Irish Zionist! the worst of it all is they are so pompous and pretend they are so civilized , Americans need to wake up and realize they are the modern versions of barbarians..they can have all the tea in china ( which they took from them too) and still be animals.
-
I'd rather deal with the British conquerors than the muslim murderers.
The British bullies your city away from you then what? They modernise it.
Way better than when muslims or others take over.
At least The British are civilized unlike the Muslims who aren't but ironically Britain now is being overrun by Muslims.
-
I'd rather deal with the British conquerors than the muslim murderers.
The British bullies your city away from you then what? They modernise it.
Way better than when muslims or others take over.
At least The British are civilized unlike the Muslims who aren't but ironically Britain now is being overrun by Muslims.
Civilized how ???because of crumpets and tea? the white papers? trying to take over the world and falling after WW2 by the hand of G-D?conspiring to bring the ayatollah committing to make Persia the Islamic republic of Iran Israels worst enemy? taking over India? Nationalizing and arming the Arabs? (trasn jordan, Iraq , Islamic republic ? etc etc) no no they never did such things what great people! just because they speak with that ridicules accent people fall in love with them.
Iranians chant death to America and israel not death to Brittan , why do you think that is? . Americans how no idea what goes on or went on Iran before you were born , or what the British did! because you family didn't live there nor did they know the people .. just the same how Ashkenazim Jews don't know what its like to live under Arab rule but us Sephardi do and we never want to live under them again!
call mussies blue collar evil , but don't call Brits civilized. Call them white collar evil if you want
-
Well that does it for me, adios.
-
Well that does it for me, adios.
My friend .. the truth is the truth .... and the truth hurts.
-
I'd rather deal with the British conquerors than the muslim murderers.
The British bullies your city away from you then what? They modernise it.
Way better than when muslims or others take over.
At least The British are civilized unlike the Muslims who aren't but ironically Britain now is being overrun by Muslims.
Civilized how ???because of crumpets and tea? the white papers? trying to take over the world and falling after WW2 by the hand of G-D?conspiring to bring the ayatollah committing to make Persia the Islamic republic of Iran Israels worst enemy? taking over India? Nationalizing and arming the Arabs? (trasn jordan, Iraq , Islamic republic ? etc etc) no no they never did such things what great people! just because they speak with that ridicules accent people fall in love with them.
Iranians chant death to America and israel not death to Brittan , why do you think that is? . Americans how no idea what goes on or went on Iran before you were born , or what the British did! because you family didn't live there nor did they know the people .. just the same how Ashkenazim Jews don't know what its like to live under Arab rule but us Sephardi do and we never want to live under them again!
call mussies blue collar evil , but don't call Brits civilized. Call them white collar evil if you want
Well compared to Muzzies everyone is civilized even blacks.
-
as a brit(englishmen), i find it quite regardless of our evil past how far the other way we have gone...we are now a woefully pc country...look how we welcome this muslim terrorists..
So they went from traditional Christian antisemitism to Islamic antisemitism... What difference from the Jewish perspective?
Historically speaking there might be very little. The thing is England's day is done and they are lucky if they keep their own heads above water. Islam is a present very real threat to the Jewish people and most of the non muslim world. This is what should be concerning us not beating a half dead horse completely to death.
-
as a brit(englishmen), i find it quite regardless of our evil past how far the other way we have gone...we are now a woefully pc country...look how we welcome this muslim terrorists..
So they went from traditional Christian antisemitism to Islamic antisemitism... What difference from the Jewish perspective?
Historically speaking there might be very little. The thing is England's day is done and they are lucky if they keep their own heads above water. Islam is a present very real threat to the Jewish people and most of the non muslim world. This is what should be concerning us not beating a half dead horse completely to death.
No no its very much a life hourse ..albiet on life support..but if you look at the beni brith and I can give you countless other they support the arabs. They r a thorn on the worlds side and they encourage the arabs with evil behavior. They r doing what they can with every breath they have ..sorry to be poetic . Yea muzzies r bad 2. But the root is the brits they make so much trouble.that being said ..take them off life support and don't underestimate their cleverness
-
Although Xtianity is a falsehood, it has some elements of truth derived from us, and as the Rambam says, the purpose of Xtianity was to spread a certain knowledge of the Tenach and belief in G-d around the world.
And who were in the forefront of that spreading: the British!
"The greatness of Britain was built on the Bible!" (Queen Victoria).
One of the British major "successes" was in partially Xtianising India, & in destroying with their bayonets the murderous Indian stranglers of the Thugee Cult (whence the word 'thug'). Better that Hindus and Xtianised Indians are in charge of India than the Muslim Moguls who ruled it for centuries. Otherwise India would today be one massive Pakistan!
-
Although Xtianity is a falsehood, it has some elements of truth derived from us, and as the Rambam says, the purpose of Xtianity was to spread a certain knowledge of the Tenach and belief in G-d around the world.
And who were in the forefront of that spreading: the British!
"The greatness of Britain was built on the Bible!" (Queen Victoria).
One of the British major "successes" was in partially Xtianising India, & in destroying with their bayonets the murderous Indian stranglers of the Thugee Cult (whence the word 'thug'). Better that Hindus and Xtianised Indians are in charge of India than the Muslim Moguls who ruled it for centuries. Otherwise India would today be one massive Pakistan!
What happened the is C on your computer broken? :::D
-
as a brit(englishmen), i find it quite regardless of our evil past how far the other way we have gone...we are now a woefully pc country...look how we welcome this muslim terrorists..
So they went from traditional Christian antisemitism to Islamic antisemitism... What difference from the Jewish perspective?
Historically speaking there might be very little. The thing is England's day is done and they are lucky if they keep their own heads above water. Islam is a present very real threat to the Jewish people and most of the non muslim world. This is what should be concerning us not beating a half dead horse completely to death.
No no its very much a life hourse ..albiet on life support..but if you look at the beni brith and I can give you countless other they support the arabs. They r a thorn on the worlds side and they encourage the arabs with evil behavior. They r doing what they can with every breath they have ..sorry to be poetic . Yea muzzies r bad 2. But the root is the brits they make so much trouble.that being said ..take them off life support and don't underestimate their cleverness
You might have a point in that England might have a bit more life in it then I gave it credit for. I just personally feel that as we speak Muslims in general are the major threat in the world today. If the English are working along with them they are working at crossed purposes. England itself has been the target of quite a few terrorist attacks.
-
Imperial india was good? Do you have any idea what they have done? pleanty of indians were non muzzie and non jesus belivers.
They helped Make pakestan and the islamic republic!
Why whould anyone defend such horrable acts? All they want to do is take advantage.
Do you know what they do to the irish ..now yes not not in the past? The mis east policy they have towrd my people..yes I'm a jew
You were not there.. I seen the horrible things they. Have done in modern yes modern. Times
And they did no spread their religon to help anyone ..all they did is spread a religon from the arrogance that they have... only though the act of G-d does the world now know what the torah is not man... in preperation of messiah so when he comes people won't get socked but that's the extent of it
-
Britain did good and bad things as all powers have done in history. They lead the horrible slave dealing from Africa, but they also have the merit of having abolished slavery in the world.
Their policy in Israel was awfull, but it was Balfour that first issued the declaration which opened the dorr for Israeli independende.
I don't see why Britain would be worse than other Empires in history
-
The Euro-Communist British Empire had the only plus point that they inadvertently helped India from getting liberated from the clutches of the worst evil muslamic terrorist domination.
However they were to lose this attribute, when they helped to give birth to another evil muslamic Papistan666. This act of theirs surely exposed, recognized and branded them as the Old Beast, who was fatally hit in the head and then was supposed to be thought as going dead but then amazingly changing in to the New Beast to the utter astonishment and veneration of the peoples and the Kings of the Earth.
:beast: ;D
-
Still can't figure out why Britain was fighting the Nazis alone for years while the Americans were sitting on their collective backsides. Or why this forum is in English, if the English were so bad. Or why the ultimate legacy of the British Empire - the USA - is still so popular for Jews who prefer not to emigrate to Israel. Or why Britain is nowadays the only country in the world providing meaningful support for the USA in Afghanistan. Doesn't make sense.
-
One things for sure, even when outnumbered 100 to one, the Redcoats at their best new how to handle Negroidals!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1csr0dxalpI
(http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/9867/screenhunter01mar091143.jpg)
-
One things for sure, even when outnumbered 100 to one, the Redcoats at their best new how to handle Negroidals!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1csr0dxalpI
(http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/9867/screenhunter01mar091143.jpg)
I like the song "Men of Harlech", althrough imo it was not right to invade and colonize Africa.
But in one thing the message of this szene from Zulu is true. The British are great soldiers. Imo they have the right balance of bravery and daringness combined with rational thought.
Did anyone know Horatio Hornblower? I had all the books from CS Forester about him - until I bourrought them a friend. :'(
-
The Brits killed the Afrikaners with no mercy
-
The Brits have always been conquerors. But what do they do after they've taken your city?
Do they blow it up? Do they murder everyone?
They take it over and build all kinds of infrastructure.
Yes I know the opium wars were bad. But the people in HK and Shanghai etc... actually like the British.
Tell me they didn't modernise HK. When they took it over, yes, they did say things like no dogs and Chinese allowed. And now?
Can we say the same about other conquerors? The Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, Hitler, Stalin, etc.....
They were butchers in the act of taking. Their goal is to take. Their goal has never been to simply pointless murder.
Even Germany after Hitler. Jews there get reparations.
Ever gotten anything under Islam or anyone else?
-
even when i was playing Age of Empires, the British and the Turks used to collude against my Indo-Chinese Empire >:(
;D
-
I don't see what's so bad about invading Africa. Honestly the natives haven't done anything of merit there except come up with bizarre scarification rituals and herd cattle. Imagine how wonderful Africa would be with human management! It would be a breadbasket for the world.
-
I suppose to sum up all I am saying , The Brits are in league with the Muslims. Case in point , Israel used forged British and Aussie ( Brit commonwealth ) passports to make the Dubai assassination so when they arrive ,there will be no suspicion , they didn't use South American or U.S. or.... well, you get the point. Guess why they used British?
Thats pretty much all im saying. Islam wants Israel of the map no doubt, but so does Brittan, and they use Muslim to do the dirty work because that's what they do best!
-
I'm not saying the Brits are such nice guys.
The subject here is: "Britan was and is the most evil empire on the face of this planet...EVER!".
Well, I say they are not.
I don't agree with the title. I think Muslims are the most evil.
Now lets see some one find a more evil people or nation or whatever.
-
I'm not saying the Brits are such nice guys.
The subject here is: "Britain was and is the most evil empire on the face of this planet...EVER!".
Well, I say they are not.
I don't agree with the title. I think Muslims are the most evil.
Now lets see some one find a more evil people or nation or whatever.
Romans were evil cruel monsters as were Russians, Nazi's, Japanese (holocausts on Chinese). Britian slaughtered millions of Irish people throughout the years. It was like a holocaust every 200 years. There is only 4 million Irish people in Ireland and England which is the same size has roughly about 50 million English people. They are nothing but oppressors and bullies. So saying the Brits are civilised is like saying the Nazi's were civilised and the murdering of 6 Million Innocent Jewish men, women and children was necessary for civilisation. And we all know that is not true. Murdering Innocent people is an act of pure evil and all nations that do that should be exposed and forced to recognise that they are held accountable for their crimes. Germany said sorry to The Jewish People. Britian never said sorry to The Irish People.
-
I'm not saying the Brits are such nice guys.
The subject here is: "Britain was and is the most evil empire on the face of this planet...EVER!".
Well, I say they are not.
I don't agree with the title. I think Muslims are the most evil.
Now lets see some one find a more evil people or nation or whatever.
Romans were evil cruel monsters as were Russians, Nazi's, Japanese (holocausts on Chinese). Britian slaughtered millions of Irish people throughout the years. It was like a holocaust every 200 years. There is only 4 million Irish people in Ireland and England which is the same size has roughly about 50 million English people. They are nothing but oppressors and bullies. So saying the Brits are civilised is like saying the Nazi's were civilised and the murdering of 6 Million Innocent Jewish men, women and children was necessary for civilisation. And we all know that is not true. Murdering Innocent people is an act of pure evil and all nations that do that should be exposed and forced to recognise that they are held accountable for their crimes. Germany said sorry to The Jewish People. Britian never said sorry to The Irish People.
yes, i'm sure those English engineered the potato blight that caused the famine in the 19th century.
-
I don't see what's so bad about invading Africa. Honestly the natives haven't done anything of merit there except come up with bizarre scarification rituals and herd cattle. Imagine how wonderful Africa would be with human management! It would be a breadbasket for the world.
Exactly. And if whites shouldn't have been in Africa, they shouldn't have been in North America either.
-
I'm not saying the Brits are such nice guys.
The subject here is: "Britain was and is the most evil empire on the face of this planet...EVER!".
Well, I say they are not.
I don't agree with the title. I think Muslims are the most evil.
Now lets see some one find a more evil people or nation or whatever.
Romans were evil cruel monsters as were Russians, Nazi's, Japanese (holocausts on Chinese). Britian slaughtered millions of Irish people throughout the years. It was like a holocaust every 200 years. There is only 4 million Irish people in Ireland and England which is the same size has roughly about 50 million English people. They are nothing but oppressors and bullies. So saying the Brits are civilised is like saying the Nazi's were civilised and the murdering of 6 Million Innocent Jewish men, women and children was necessary for civilisation. And we all know that is not true. Murdering Innocent people is an act of pure evil and all nations that do that should be exposed and forced to recognise that they are held accountable for their crimes. Germany said sorry to The Jewish People. Britian never said sorry to The Irish People.
Actually, I do see that.
I didn't say they were nice guys or peace loving vegetable eaters.
Yes, what they did to the Irish was terrible. And they're paying for it now with the invasion of of disgusting muslims.
-
http://www.irishholocaust.org/britain%27scoverup
Britain's Cover Up
The cover-up is accomplished by the same British terrorism and bribery that perpetrated the genocide. Consider: why does Irish President Mary Robinson call it "Ireland's greatest natural 1 disaster" while she conceals the British army's role? Potato blight, "phytophthora infestans", did spread from America to Europe in 1844, to England and then Ireland in 1845 but it didn't cause famine anywhere. Ireland did not starve for potatoes; it starved for food.
Ireland starved because its food, from 40 to 70 shiploads per day, was removed at gunpoint by 12,000 British constables reinforced by the British militia, battleships, excise vessels, Coast Guard and by 200,000 British soldiers (100,000 at any given moment) The attached map shows the never-before-published names and locations in Ireland of the food removal regiments (Disposition of the Army; Public Record Office, London; et al, of which we possess photocopies). Thus, Britain seized from Ireland's producers tens of millions of head of livestock; tens of millions of tons of flour, grains, meat, poultry & dairy products; enough to sustain 18 million persons.
The Public Record Office recently informed us that their British regiments' Daily Activity Reports of 1845-1850 have "gone missing." Those records include each regiment's cattle drives and grain-cart convoys it escorted at gun-point from the Irish districts assigned to it. Also "missing" are the receipts issued by the British army commissariat officers in every Irish port tallying the cattle and tonnage of foodstuff removed; likewise the export lading manifests. Other records provide all-revealing glimpses of the "missing" data; such as: ...
-
http://www.irishholocaust.org/thefoodremoval
The Food Removal
From Cork harbor on one day in 1847 2 the AJAX steamed for England with 1,514 firkins of butter, 102 casks of pork, 44 hogsheads of whiskey, 844 sacks of oats, 247 sacks of wheat, 106 bales of bacon, 13 casks of hams, 145 casks of porter, 12 sacks of fodder, 28 bales of feathers, 8 sacks of lard, 296 boxes of eggs, 30 head of cattle, 90 pigs, 220 lambs, 34 calves and 69 miscellaneous packages. On November 14, 1848 3, sailed, from Cork harbor alone: 147 bales of bacon, 120 casks and 135 barrels of pork, 5 casks of hams, 149 casks of miscellaneous provisions (foodstuff); 1,996 sacks & 950 barrels of oats; 300 bags of flour; 300 head of cattle; 239 sheep; 9,398 firkins of butter; 542 boxes of eggs. On July 28, 1848 4; a typical day's food shipments from only the following four ports: from Limerick: the ANN, JOHN GUISE and MESSENGER for London; the PELTON CLINTON for Liverpool; and the CITY OF LIMERICK, BRITISH QUEEN, and CAMBRIAN MAID for Glasgow. This one-day removal of Limerick's food was of 863 firkins of butter; 212 firkins, 1,198 casks and 200 kegs of lard, 87 casks of ham; 267 bales of bacon; 52 barrels of pork; 45 tons and 628 barrels of flour; 4,975 barrels of oats and 1,000 barrels of barley. From Kilrush: the ELLEN for Bristol; the CHARLES G. FRYER and MARY ELLIOTT for London. This one-day removal was of 550 tons of County Clare's oats and 15 tons of its barley. From Tralee: the JOHN ST. BARBE, CLAUDIA and QUEEN for London; the SPOKESMAN for Liverpool. This one-day removal was of 711 tons of Kerry's oats and 118 tons of its barley. From Galway: the MARY, VICTORIA, and DILIGENCE for London; the SWAN and UNION for Limerick (probably for transshipment to England). This one-day removal was of 60 sacks of Co. Galway's flour; 30 sacks and 292 tons of its oatmeal; 294 tons of its oats; and 140 tons of its miscellaneous provisions (foodstuffs). British soldiers forcibly removed it from its starving Limerick, Clare, Kerry and Galway producers.
In Belmullet, Co. Mayo the mission of 151 soldiers 5 of the 49th Regiment, in addition to escorting livestock and crops to the port for export, was to guard a few tons of stored meal from the hands of the starving; its population falling from 237 to 105 between 1841 and 1851. Belmullet also lost its source of fish in January, 1849, when Britain's Coast Guard arrested its fleet of enterprising fishermen ten miles at sea in the act of off-loading flour from a passing ship. They were sentenced to prison and their currachs were confiscated.
The Waterford Harbor British army commissariat officer wrote to British Treasury Chief Charles Trevelyan on April 24, 1846; "The barges leave Clonmel once a week for this place, with the export supplies under convoy which, last Tuesday, consisted of 2 guns, 50 cavalry, and 80 infantry escorting them on the banks of the Suir as far as Carrick." While its people starved, the Clonmel district exported annually, along with its other farm produce, approximately 60,000 pigs in the form of cured pork. ...
-
http://www.irishholocaust.org/officialbritishintent
Official British Intent
Official British intent at the time is revealed by its actions and enactments. When the European potato crop failed in 1844 and food prices rose, Britain ordered regiments to Ireland. When blight hit the 1845 English potato crop its food removal regiments were already in Ireland; ready to start. The Times editorial of September 30, 1845, warned; "In England the two main meals of a working man's day now consists of potatoes." England's potato-dependence was excessive; reckless. Grossly over-populated relative to its food supply, England faced famine unless it could import vast amounts of alternative food. But it didn't grab merely Ireland's surplus food; or enough Irish food to save England. It took more; for profit and to exterminate the people of Ireland. Queen Victoria's economist, Nassau Senior, expressed his fear that existing policies "will not kill more than one million Irish in 1848 and that will scarcely be enough to do much good."6 When an eye-witness urged a stop to the genocide-in-progress, Trevelyan replied: "We must not complain of what we really want to obtain."7 Trevelyan insisted that all reports of starvation were exaggerated, until 1847. He then declared it ended and refused entry to the American food relief ship Sorciére. Thomas Carlyle; influential British essayist, wrote; "Ireland is like a half-starved rat that crosses the path of an elephant. What must the elephant do? Squelch it - by heavens - squelch it." "Total Annihilation;" suggested The Times leader of September 2, 1846; and in 1848 its editorialists crowed "A Celt will soon be as rare on the banks of the Shannon as the red man on the banks of Manhattan." The immortal Society of Friends, the "Quakers," did all in their power to save lives. But in 1847 they despaired and quit, upon learning that the Crown planned to perpetuate the genocide's pretext; the British claim of "ownership" of Irish land. Quakers refused to facilitate the genocide by pretending (as Concern does re African genocides) it was an act of nature. In the 1870s; too late; British laws were enacted allowing the Irish to buy back the land of which Britain had robbed them. Twice-yearly payments were extracted from Ireland's farmers until that "debt" was paid off in the 1970s. Ireland's diet, since pre-history, has been meat, dairy products, grains, fruit and vegetables; latterly supplemented by potatoes. Central to its ancient legends are its livestock, reaping hooks, flails,8 querns, and grain-kilns and -mills. The many Connacht grain-kilns and -mills shown on the Irish Ordnance Survey Map of 1837-1841 operated continually prior to, during the Starvation, and subsequent to it until the 1940s when I observed them still working. Local farmers dried and milled their grain - not potatoes - in them, and this oatmeal and flour were seized and exported by British forces. The "potato famine" Big Lie was underway and already denounced by John Mitchel in his United Irishman in 1847 (he was soon sent in chains to a Tasmanian death camp; but escaped). Fifty years later G.B. Shaw wrote in Man and Superman: "Malone: 'My father died of starvation in Ireland in the Black '47. Maybe you've heard of it?' Violet: 'The Famine?' Malone: (with smoldering passion) 'No, the Starvation. When a country is full of food and exporting it, there can be no Famine."' But he kept mum on the British army's role; Ireland's whole-truth-tellers don't receive Nobels. To date, the Big Lie prevails. It started in 1846 when, while the British government genocidally stripped Ireland of its abundant foodstuffs, internationally it was begging help for the "starving Irish." John Mitchel remonstrated; "Many will, perhaps, be surprised to learn neither Ireland, nor anybody in Ireland ever asked alms or favors of any kind, either from England or from any other nation or people. On the contrary, it was England herself that begged for us, asking a penny, for the love of God, to relieve the poor Irish. And further, constituting herself the almoner and agent of all that charity, she, England, took all the profit of it." Mitchel again; 'Thus any man who had a house, no matter how wretched, was to pay the new tax; and every man was bound to have a house; for if found out of doors after sunset; and convicted of that offence, he was to be transported for fifteen years, or imprisoned for three - the court to have the discretion of adding hard labor or solitary confinement. This law would drive the survivors of ejected people (those who did not die of hunger) into the poorhouses or to America; because, being bound to be at home after sunset, and having neither house nor home, they would be all in the absolute power of the police, and in continual peril of transportation to the colonies (Australian slave labor camps). By another act of parliament the police force was increased, and taken more immediately into the service of the Crown; the Irish counties were in part relieved from their pay; and they became, in all senses, a portion of the regular army. They amounted to twelve thousand chosen men, well armed and drilled. The police were always at the command of sheriffs for executing ejectments; and if they were not in sufficient force, troops of the line could be had from the nearest garrison. No wonder that the London Times, within less than three years after, was enabled to say; 'Law has ridden roughshod through Ireland, it has been taught with bayonet, and interpreted with ruin. Townships levelled with the ground, straggling columns of exiles, workhouses multiplied, and still crowded, express the determination of the legislature to remove Ireland from its slovenly old barbarism, and to plant the institutions of this more civilized land' (meaning England!)" Mitchel also wrote; "Steadily, but surely, the 'Government' was working out its calculation; and the produce anticipated by 'political circles' was likely to come out about September (of 1847), in round numbers - two millions of Irish corpses." 9 ...
-
http://www.irishholocaust.org/tollofholocaust
Toll of Holocaust
Toll of Irish Holocaust. The 1841 census of Ireland revealed a population of 10,897,449. This figure includes the correction factor established by that year's official partial recount. When, between 1779 and 1841, the U.S. population increased by 640 percent, and England's is estimated to have increased, despite massive emigration to its colonies, by 100 percent, it is generally accepted that Ireland's population increase was 172% 10. The average annual component of this 172% increase is x in the formula (1+ x)62 = 1 + 172%; thus 0.0163, or 1.63%. Accepting that this 1.63% rate of annual population increase continued until mid-1846 (one human gestation after the late-1845 beginning of removal of Ireland's food), the 1846 population was 11,815,011.
Assuming that rate continued, the population in 1851, absent the starvation, would have been approximately 12,809,841. However; the 1851 census recorded a population of 6,552,385; thus there was a "disappearance" of 6,257,456. This population-loss figure of 6,257,456 is scarcely susceptible to significant challenge, being derived directly from the British government's own censuses for Ireland. It is reasonable to assume that the rigor established in the recount of 1841 became the standard for the 1851 census; so that any residual undercount would be systemic, affecting 1841 and 1851 proportionately (and, if known, would increase the murder total). These 6,257,456 include roughly 1,000,000 who successfully fled into exile and another 100,000 unborn between 1846 and 1851 due to malnutrition-induced infertility. Of the 100,000 who fled to Canada in 1847, only 60,000 were still alive one month after landing.11 Among the 40,000 dead was Henry Ford's father's mother who died en route from Cork or in quarantine on Quebec's Grosse Ile.
Thus; though from 1845 through 1850, 6,257,456 "disappeared," the number murdered is approximately 1.1 million fewer; i.e., 5.16 millions. Consequently; if Britain's census figures for Ireland are correct the British government murdered approximately 5.16 million Irish men, women and children; making it the Irish Holocaust. This number, 5.16 million, exceeds the high end of the range (4.2 to 5.1 million) of serious estimates of the number of Jews murdered by Nazis. The least reliable component of the foregoing arithmetic is the number assumed to have successfully fled. If the fleers who survived prove to number, say, 900,000 instead of 1,000,000, the murder count will have to be corrected from 5.16 to 5.26 millions. This amount of adjustment, up or down, of the 5.16 millions murdered is determinable by sensitive review of the immigration records of the U.S., Canada, Argentina, and Australia; and of government records on the Irish who fled to Britain at the time. We invite bona fide documentation of the foregoing; whether in confirmation or rebuttal. Economists and historians are disqualified if their published work on the events of 1845-1850 covers up the British army's central role therein. Such individuals lack the standing to participate in this truth-quest.
To our knowledge nobody else has ever published the above arithmetic or named the food removal regiments and battleships. Evidence that other truth-telling accounts exist would be greatly appreciated. Irish academia shuns and slurs Tom Gallagher's Paddy's Lament and Englishwoman Cecil Woodham-Smith's The Great Hunger for mentioning the Food Removal. Woodham-Smith fudged, but not enough to satisfy the cover-up cabal. For example; she reported that the 1841 partial recount established a correction factor of one-third for the 1841 census figure; but she used the uncorrected figure to calculate! By this and other fudges she arrived at a population-loss of only 2.5 million. She allocated only half a page to the core facts of the Genocide; the food removal data, while using some two hundred pages to describe British government "relief measures" as if they were something other than cosmetic exercises; a cover-up. But just as Telefis Eireann out-Britished Yorkshire TV by refusing to co-premiere the latter's 1993 exposé of the 5/17/74 British bombings of Dublin/Monaghan streets that murdered 33 and maimed 253; and as the Irish police menace the survivors of that bombing instead of arresting the known British perpetrators; so do Irish historians out-British Woodham-Smith by ostracizing her for exposing the Food Removal. They out-do themselves in describing the "benefit" of the Irish Holocaust; how Britain reduced poverty in Ireland ( by murdering those it had impoverished! They promote the notion that only the blighted potato crop belonged to the Irish while Ireland's abundant livestock, grains, etc., all "belonged" to mostly absentee English landlords. By that insane standard all of the property and production of Europe and Asia, excepting starvation rations for workers, would belong to W.W.II GIs and their heirs (or to the Axis had it won).
Irish are not guilty. Though many Holocaust Irish, like many, say, Auschwitz Jews, took deadly advantage of their own weakest, neither the Irish nor Jewish communities had hand or part in the conceiving and planning of the genocides from London and Berlin; respectively. But, the German government repented and paid $100 billion (dollars) reparations to Jews while the British government and its Dublin surrogates still use terror and slander against those who commemorate the Irish Holocaust. It is still dangerous - after 150 years - to reveal the truth of it. ...
-
Irish Zionist ...most Americans have no clue how evil the British empire is. The sad thing is when Americans hear the word European or think of that British accent they think sophistication. It is the same reason only Sephardic Jews like me know how horrible it is to live under Muslim rule and liberal European Jews don't. We know how horrible the Brits are because we lived under them...Americans don't and when they did..Well we know what happen there!!!!!!
The good thing about JTF is that we all agree how Islam is bad so we all agree with that , and it was Rabbi Kahane that help Introduce this to MODERN Americans that were spared by Islam and prepare them for it and again he repetitively said "the reason Israel wants to appease Arabs is that they are ruled by Liberal European Jews that were also lucky not to live by them"
People , Great JTFers ... The Brits Oppress. Look at the difference between Canada and Austria British commonwealths and look at Our great country we live in when we broke free from the Brits!!! can Toronto or Sydney be compared to New York City >??? :P
Yes , Indeed Kahanas Slogan NEVER FORGET!!! Was and is applicable to Jews even though Nazi Germany is dead
How much more so the slogan NEVER FORGET! Should be even more so applicable to Americans that were oppressed by the Brits >:(
Americans speak English, so it is very difficult to separate another psychologically speaking and I do not blame the forum members for not being fully convinced because there do feel a natural affinity and connection with Brittan. it took tons of documents speaking to people like Irish Zionist and Persian Royalty that my family is connected with to truly see how Britain CREATED From most modern to past and I will undoubtedly miss some....
So for the people that agree Islam is Evil LISTEN TO THIS PLEASE To What Evil Brittan has CREATED!!!!!
............................ From westernized Iran(Persia) to The Islamic Republic of Iran ..............................
.........................................................Pakistan.................................. ....................
............................................................Iraq................................... .................................
......................................................Saudi Arabia (remember the Brit in Lawrence of Arabia)........................
..........................................................Trans Jordan............................................
............................................................Etc,Etc,Etc............................................................
:'(
What is the greatest danger America and Israel face today?
1.The Islamic Republic of Iran
not only did Brittan create The Islamic Republic of Iran, They support them. Brittan has an embassy there we do not.
these are not conspiratress but facts even Wikipedia has ,. people don’t read!!!
LOOK>>
According to the book All the Shah's Men, the British tried to convince Harry S. Truman to join their campaign against Iran. However it was only when Dwight Eisenhower became the president that British succeeded in convincing U.S. to join their plot. In order to convince the Eisenhower administration Woodhouse shaped his appeal around the rhetoric of anti-communism. They pointed out the Tudeh party could take control of Iran. Eventually British and CIA created a plan code named Operation Ajax to overthrow the democratically elected Mosaddegh. The coup was performed by Central Intelligence Agency field commander Kermit Roosevelt, Jr. (grandson of Theodore Roosevelt)
.http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:1sOFOosdelIJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_%E2%80%93_United_Kingdom_relations+britain+iran+relations&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
more??
Iran
REGISTRATION / EMBASSY LOCATION: The U.S. government does not have diplomatic or consular relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran and therefore cannot ...
travel.state.gov › ... › International Travel Information - Cached - Similar
guess who does?? :o
UK in Iran
The UK has never denied Iran's right to pursue a peaceful civilian nuclear programme. ... UK in Iran - the official website for the British Embassy in Iran ... We have a new improved online registration service called LOCATE for British ...ukiniran.fco.gov.uk
:dance: :dance:
-
Anyone who says it was a potato famine is a holocaust denier.
-
Should I assume you live in Ireland?
-
18chai - You're right. I did see their good looks over their [plunder-and-pillage] evil deeds.
...But I would still be weak in the knees in calling them the MOST evil people.
As for the most evil empire....that would probably be another hard call. I would say that all empires have been evil. Because how do you have a massive empire without murdering all resistance?
-
Should I assume you live in Ireland?
Yes I do and I assume you live in China?
-
Should I assume you live in Ireland?
Yes I do and I assume you live in China?
Nope. You can't. This site is banned in China. I live in the People's City of New York [New York City].
OK. The British are evil. ...but not the most evil.
What part of Ireland do you live in and have they been forced to drive on the wrong side of the road?
-
Sometimes British perfidy is good, such as the 'betrayal' of the handing over of 50,000 pro-Nazi Cossacks to the Soviets in 1945 Austria to be massacred!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repatriation_of_Cossacks_after_WWII
Wunderbar!
-
18chai - You're right. I did see their good looks over their [plunder-and-pillage] evil deeds.
...But I would still be weak in the knees in calling them the MOST evil people.
As for the most evil empire....that would probably be another hard call. I would say that all empires have been evil. Because how do you have a massive empire without murdering all resistance?
Thank you :)
Thats just it having an Empire that takes over other people is an Evil act.......Having an Empire that helped create even more evil empire (Islamic Republic ..etc etc etc is even worse!!)
At least the Nazis and Islam are open about their hatred of Jews.
Chaim ben Pesach allays said "Islam makes you Stupid" these fakestinas are to stupid to organize a birthday party the second Iran was a rising power in Asia the Second It because a theocracy they because so dumb their oil refineries began to rot in the desert because no one knew how to operate them.
Alas ,Brittan knows exactly what Chaim does!! Do you think he is the only one that knows this? No our enemies know this as well! Do you think they were able to create such a vast empire because of their lack of cleverness? No sir , they know what Chaim does and they use that knowledge that Chaim preaches , create organized Islamic powers so they can be manipulated by them. We all know how much England hates the Jews (ask chaim) ...the worst is they hate us for no reason. Why didn't they let the Jews go to Israel during the holocaust ..why did they turn those bouts away ..WHY WHY!!! THEY HATE US!!!!!! They knew they were sending us to your deaths not to long ago.
The Torah predicts Ishmael and Amalek will band together and unite against the Jews. WW2 was only Amalek
WW3 will be the arab world and The united kingdom ..
We see already the cleaver games even with the us , .. as we see with eb22 recent post ..U.S. condemns Israel's decision to build in disputed territory
March 9, 2010 6:24 p.m. EST
Jerusalem (CNN) -- Vice President Joe Biden said Tuesday that the United States condemns Israel's decision to build neighborhood, calling it "a step that undermines the trust we need right now."
"I condemn the decision by the government of Israel to advance planning for new housing units in East Jerusalem," Biden said in a statement issued just hours after he met with Israeli leaders in the region.
"The substance and timing of the announcement, particularly with the launching of proximity talks, is precisely the kind of step that undermines the trust we need right now and runs counter to the constructive discussions that I've had here in Israel."
The construction, announced earlier Tuesday, will be in the Ramat Shlomo neighborhood, located in disputed territory in East Jerusalem. The Israeli Interior Ministry denies the territory is in East Jerusalem.
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs echoed Biden's condemnation at a briefing in Washington.
"I don't believe that either the substance or the timing [of the announcement] is particularly helpful, and I think [it] runs counter to the very productive talks the vice president was having in the region," Gibbs said.
Biden is the highest-ranking member of the Obama administration to visit Israel, and he emphasized America's close ties with Israel earlier Tuesday during meetings with top Israeli leaders. He said the bond between the two nations is unshakable.
On efforts to restart the peace process, Biden said, "We are at a moment of real opportunity. I think that the interests of the Israeli and Palestinian people, if everybody stops and takes a deep breath, are actually more in line than they are opposites."
After the plan for construction was announced, lead Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat said the Israeli government is "determined to undermine" efforts to jump-start peace negotiations and called the plan "a disaster."
The area where the construction is to take place is "in occupied Palestinian territory, and that's the issue we are supposed to negotiate, and now they are dictating rather than negotiating," Erakat said.
The Israeli Interior Ministry said the construction plan was approved by a district committee, and the public can express objections to it over the next 60 days.
The minister of interior did not approve the plan, as expanding an existing neighborhood is in the hands of the district committee, the ministry said.
However, Meir Margalit of the Jerusalem Municipality -- representing the leftist party Meretz -- said the ministry's planning and building committee is a political committee that acts under the minister's political guidance. Even if objections are voiced in the 60-day period, he said, most are ignored.
The claim that the minister had no hand in the decision is a "complete lie," Margalit said. "The minister decides his office's policy, including that of the committee."
In a later announcement, the Interior Ministry said the plan has taken more than three years to come to fruition and is a "procedural stage as part of a longer procedure which would take quite some time to complete."
"The timing of the committee meeting was preset and has nothing to do with the American vice president's visit to Israel," the ministry said.
The announcement came a day after George Mitchell, the Obama administration's special envoy for Middle East peace, announced that Israeli and Palestinian leaders had accepted indirect talks aimed at restarting direct talks. Negotiations between the two sides have been stalled for over a year.
In announcing those indirect talks, Mitchell, who is also visiting the region with Biden, encouraged both sides to refrain from any statements or actions that could inflame tensions or prejudice the outcome of the talks.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in January his government made a series of concessions to the Palestinians, including a 10-month moratorium on West Bank settlement construction and the removal of dozens of checkpoints and roadblocks. However, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas had refused to re-enter negotiations until Israel enacted a complete freeze of all settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
On Monday, Erakat expressed skepticism about the indirect talks, pointing to Israeli approval of 112 apartment units in a settlement in the southern part of the West Bank near Bethlehem.
Abbas told Mitchell, Erakat said, that "if every visit is going to be announced by more settlements and unilateral declarations and imposing reality on the ground ... this places a question mark on all the efforts that we are undergoing."
this was my friends reaction (not jewsh)
lol chutzpah... youve never used yiddish slangf before...
I read that article while i was in class last night... I was confusing because they say the US offers its "unyeilding support of Israel" and then gets angry about a housing project?? WTF
my replyTF indeed. like that black Israelite said lol you want to talk about hatred and racism? that's blatant hatred and racism!,
join JTF.org
from the bible.
I will bless them if bless thee
And curse them if curse thee
kahane assassination in nov 1990
wtc bombing by the assassinater they let free 1993..u wanna talk about the lord talking about punishment measure for measure? Thats blatant measure for measure in only 36 months less then a car payment!
Prime minster issac rabin tryed to make "piece"lol gets shot
Clinton administrations pressures Israel for 8 years = 911 Clinton gets impeached later in office as well for the immoral sex scandal
Israeli prime minister sharon gives up land ..fatal stroke 3 weeks later
The Us immoral new Orleans act .... Flood (any more biblical) what has to happen ???
even in the bible there was small warnings .. its like a kid you say clean up room nicely the kid says no , again , no again , no then you have to yell!! and may result in corporal punishment if there still is refusal
you will see what else will happen
how much more England hates us.
-
Sometimes British perfidy is good, such as the 'betrayal' of the handing over of 50,000 pro-Nazi Cossacks to the Soviets in 1945 Austria to be massacred!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repatriation_of_Cossacks_after_WWII
Wunderbar!
Good for the Cossacks ....lol.........Im sure they did it to be a light onto the nations lol :laugh:
-
The fact that King Abdullah is a Hashemite Muslim with a white British mother makes him TRIPLY dangerous!
(http://www.kabobfest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/King_Abdullah_on_Star_Trek2.jpg)
-
I'd rather deal with the British conquerors than the muslim murderers.
The British bullies your city away from you then what? They modernise it.
Way better than when muslims or others take over.
I am sure that good English people agree there with you.
-
I'd rather deal with the British conquerors than the muslim murderers.
The British bullies your city away from you then what? They modernise it.
Way better than when muslims or others take over.
I am sure that good English people agree there with you.
AsheDina. there is good in all, not trying to insult good, decent righteous British citizens , I am trying to bring to light however something that actually is in your profile quote.
"The banding together by the nations of the world against Israel is the guarantee that their time of destruction is near and the final redemption of the Jew at hand." Meir Kahane
-
I'd rather deal with the British conquerors than the muslim murderers.
The British bullies your city away from you then what? They modernise it.
Way better than when muslims or others take over.
I am sure that good English people agree there with you.
AsheDina. there is good in all, not trying to insult good, decent righteous British citizens , I am trying to bring to light however something that actually is in your profile quote.
"The banding together by the nations of the world against Israel is the guarantee that their time of destruction is near and the final redemption of the Jew at hand." Meir Kahane
I'm putting that quote in my sig.
-
I don't see what's so bad about invading Africa. Honestly the natives haven't done anything of merit there except come up with bizarre scarification rituals and herd cattle. Imagine how wonderful Africa would be with human management! It would be a breadbasket for the world.
Exactly. And if whites shouldn't have been in Africa, they shouldn't have been in North America either.
Having failed to get any comment on this and my previous post, here's another one for everyone to ignore. Until shortly before the potato famine, British coal mines were populated by young children dressed in filthy rags (if anything), chained by iron shoulder yolks to trucks, working in total darkness, overrun by rats, and allowed just one day a week to pray and give thanks to Almighty G-d for the wonderful life He had given them. I guess that these kids were also reponsible for the potato famine, murdering Afrikaaners, slavery, etc. etc. Over-generalisations are ridiculous, and best dismissed as Pub Talk. Perhaps the same US pubs where the Irish terrorists collected/collect money for bombs to maim and kill their fellow Irish. As a normal British person I do not hate the Irish, or the Jews, or the Negroes, or the Hindus, or even the Americans. I would make two suggestions to the US Jews on this forum: (a) make some sacrifices and emigrate to Israel; and (b) recognise that Islam might just be a worse enemy than the British.
-
This thread is disgusting. Britain did in fact fail to support Jews during Israeli independence and even supported Arabs. Their policy towards the Middle East now is as bad a that of any other country. But calling Britain evil is an insult to many British members and readers of the forum.
Under the current international situation, anti-British stances can be dangerous. It's Muslims and communists who blame "British colonialism" for all the problems of the world. Today, backing any anti-British propaganda is a victory for Nazis, Communists, Iranians and third world fascist nationalism
-
"I do not hate the Irish, or the Jews, or the Negroes, or the Hindus, or even the Americans. I would make two suggestions to the US Jews on this forum: (a) make some sacrifices and emigrate to Israel; and (b) recognise that Islam might just be a worse enemy than the British."
A; I Agree and I am making such "sacrifices".
B; I also agree , But Britain helped create them , why do you choose to neglect all the other facts i have given.
Furthermore, you may be a great person but that's what Brittan is doing If they created the trans Jordan ,well, they created the trans Jordan. Why be upset at the post ..its a fact ..i didn't do these things.... why censor me?... not censoring my thoughts is just as like Rabbi Kahane said .....
when Jews sat idly in America because "they were afraid of what gentiles would say think and do" ....Like you. Well, i am sorry i am not afraid of what gentiles might say.
crusades, inquisitions, holocaust by the Europeans?? Thanks but no Thanks . Rabbi Meir Kahane.
This tread is not disgusting ... And there is no doubt that it may be taken personally by a British member..dont i have nothing against you personally and i love how you support America and Israel, but its not just me, take a look at all the recent British - Anti Israel stances Britt is taking ..don't get upset at the thread, be upset at your rulers and do something .. if you are a professor, ..teach your students the right thing ... things like that, if you are pro saving western civilization and Israel .....because your leaders are letting the muzzies come in your land as well for greed...and not just in Britt ,you know how the mussies are spreading all over Europe.
-
England also contributed to their downfall by bringing in the Muzzies as a work force! Not too Bright!
-
England also contributed to their downfall by bringing in the Muzzies as a work force! Not too Bright!
You are quite right. Unfortunately, though, when people talk of Britain's "downfall" they automatically assume that it was somehow better when it was powerful. It is asking a lot of any Empire never to make mistakes. Britain's main mistake, like that of Rome 2000 years before, was to fall out with the Germans. Or perhaps to confuse Zulus carrying spears with Germans using machine guns. The USA declined to assist until Britain was well and truly about to be invaded and, as Churchill said, one of their aims by doing so was to destroy the Empire. There was no Marshall Plan for Britain, and only recently did they finish paying for the bullets they borrowed. However, the point remains that Britain stood up against the Nazis alone for much of the war, and your ill-informed associates in this forum are just too numerous. I think I'll join Looserivet and take a break.
-
England also contributed to their downfall by bringing in the Muzzies as a work force! Not too Bright!
You are quite right. Unfortunately, though, when people talk of Britain's "downfall" they automatically assume that it was somehow better when it was powerful. It is asking a lot of any Empire never to make mistakes. Britain's main mistake, like that of Rome 2000 years before, was to fall out with the Germans. Or perhaps to confuse Zulus carrying spears with Germans using machine guns. The USA declined to assist until Britain was well and truly about to be invaded and, as Churchill said, one of their aims by doing so was to destroy the Empire. There was no Marshall Plan for Britain, and only recently did they finish paying for the bullets they borrowed. However, the point remains that Britain stood up against the Nazis alone for much of the war, and your ill-informed associates in this forum are just too numerous. I think I'll join Looserivet and take a break.
You are being biased and ignoring facts because you are British ..and its o.k. i don't except anymore. The Britain/German attacks in WW2 were not as shallow as you make it out to be.
-
R.Kahane never even got to visit London or to speak there, because he was deported on touchdown at Heathrow Airport in 1982, thanks to Anglo-Jewish court-Jew establishment traitors like Chief Rabbi Immanuel Jakobovits & MP Greville "grovel" Janner, who tipped off the anti-Israel British Foreign Office.
-
R.Kahane never even got to visit London or to speak there, because he was deported on touchdown at Heathrow Airport in 1982, thanks to Anglo-Jewish court-Jew establishment traitors like Chief Rabbi Immanuel Jakobovits & MP Greville "grovel" Janner, who tipped off the anti-Israel British Foreign Office.
..Wow really?? I didn't even know that!