will the mothership only suck up the white race?
what about non-whites and mix-ups?
what about blacks who are partly white?
The 'martians' landed some 1400 years ago somewhere around mekka.;D :laugh: :laugh: :::D :::D :::D
Even just recently the deceased Lubavitcher Rabbi Menachem Schneerson wrote to the most prominent Jewish scientists worldwide to denounce them for their "anti-Torah" stance in their having accepted as fact that the Earth and other planets revolved around the Sun.
He insisted that Torah PROVES the ULTIMATE TRUTH that the Earth is the center of the entire known Universe, and all of Creation revolves around a stationary Earth.
He also claimed there could be no life forms beyond Earth other than bacteria.
And if the stories about aliens are true, I feel really sorry for the aliens, because any alien beings wanting to become involved with humans on planet Earth must be gluttons for punishment.
There is so much evidence that these military experts are telling the truth that it is very foolish to reject their testimonies out of hand.
will the mothership only suck up the white race?
what about non-whites and mix-ups?
what about blacks who are partly white?
ACT said it had no intention of attempting to use the human cloning procedure to start a pregnancy - its aim was "therapeutic cloning" not "reproductive cloning", it said.
I don't really think aliens from another civilization out in space are visiting earth.
I do think it's possible that people may be having very vivid dreams or hallucinations, or even demonic visitation in the form of what looks like the typical "aliens" (some stories about Sidhe from Ireland or other similar stories from Europe describe similar appearance and experience of being abducted. Australian aboriginals had paintings that looked the same, etc.).
Also it's possible that some stuff was genetically engineered and looks freaky. There have been news stories about embryos made from cow and human DNA, for example, but the claim is that these are stopped before they develop beyond a certain point. Who knows how far the unethical experimentation has been allowed to progress with such stuff in reality.
Before people start saying "oh no she's a nutcase" read it and weep:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/371378.stmQuoteACT said it had no intention of attempting to use the human cloning procedure to start a pregnancy - its aim was "therapeutic cloning" not "reproductive cloning", it said.
That time maybe. Also they say that the embryo doesn't have cow DNA, but it would have cow dna in the mitochondria in the cells.
G-d only knows how far this stuff goes.
I am pro-science but human life needs to be respected more than that.
this usually happens when people use cocaine.
Also it's possible that some stuff was genetically engineered and looks freaky. There have been news stories about embryos made from cow and human DNA, for example, but the claim is that these are stopped before they develop beyond a certain point. Who knows how far the unethical experimentation has been allowed to progress with such stuff in reality.
Before people start saying "oh no she's a nutcase" read it and weep:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/371378.stmQuoteACT said it had no intention of attempting to use the human cloning procedure to start a pregnancy - its aim was "therapeutic cloning" not "reproductive cloning", it said.
That time maybe. Also they say that the embryo doesn't have cow DNA, but it would have cow dna in the mitochondria in the cells.
G-d only knows how far this stuff goes.
I am pro-science but human life needs to be respected more than that.
There have been news stories about embryos made from cow and human DNA, for example, but the claim is that these are stopped before they develop beyond a certain point.
Who knows how far the unethical experimentation has been allowed to progress with such stuff in reality.
QuoteACT said it had no intention of attempting to use the human cloning procedure to start a pregnancy - its aim was "therapeutic cloning" not "reproductive cloning", it said.
That time maybe. Also they say that the embryo doesn't have cow DNA, but it would have cow dna in the mitochondria in the cells.
The company said it had released news of the discovery to try to allay fears over the artificial conception of life.So, at the time, they didn't even need to report any of the then- as-yet-unpublished work they were doing but did so anyway for public benefit). (and perhaps to scoop their rivals)
Does someone have a link ?
I am yet to see any hard evidence that aliens visit earth. So far I am aware of lots of excrement stories about alien abducting humans, raping and sodomizing humans, mutilating cows, etc.
For example, an experiment that would raise concerns, he said, is genetically engineering mice to produce human sperm and eggs, then doing in vitro fertilization to produce a child whose parents are a pair of mice.
Can you believe they were eating anuses boiled in feces and thought it was an ethnic delicacy?
Well, ... on second thought, I guess it is an ethnic delicacy! :::D
KWRBT, I know the difference between mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA. However mixing these together into one cell/entity with a human's nuclear DNA and a cow's mitochondrial DNA being in the same cell is wrong to me. I think the researchers who were doing this experiment were just reporting what they were doing, but my point (poorly made, I suppose) was that other researchers might not be stopping these embryos from growing and might implant them. Also there might be other experiments as-yet unreported that mix nuclear DNA from different creatures.
I don't know exactly how they're getting pigs to have human blood running through their veins, but it scares me a bit:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/01/0125_050125_chimeras.html
Here's one hypothetical problem that's possible:QuoteFor example, an experiment that would raise concerns, he said, is genetically engineering mice to produce human sperm and eggs, then doing in vitro fertilization to produce a child whose parents are a pair of mice.
It says nobody would actually try to do that experiment, but I am not so sure. There have been scientists in the past that are willing to do the most unethical work.
A lot of the experiments the Nazis did didn't make a lot of sense either, but they were done out of utter depravity and a total lack of limits as to ethical guidelines. I think if a scientist had the funding, enough secrecy surrounding the work, and could come up with a rationale for doing the research, some would do this kind of thing just for the fact that it can be done.
A lot of the experiments the Nazis did didn't make a lot of sense either, but they were done out of utter depravity and a total lack of limits as to ethical guidelines. I think if a scientist had the funding, enough secrecy surrounding the work, and could come up with a rationale for doing the research, some would do this kind of thing just for the fact that it can be done.
The comparison to the nazis y''s is not valid. They didn't have ethics committees and legal restraints or conditional funding. Their program was anything goes and their evil so-called scientists carried out whatever they wanted.
That is not the system in place in America, therefore pointing to the nazis and saying we should worry about our current scientists, does not hold water. Sorry.
A lot of the experiments the Nazis did didn't make a lot of sense either, but they were done out of utter depravity and a total lack of limits as to ethical guidelines. I think if a scientist had the funding, enough secrecy surrounding the work, and could come up with a rationale for doing the research, some would do this kind of thing just for the fact that it can be done.
The comparison to the nazis y''s is not valid. They didn't have ethics committees and legal restraints or conditional funding. Their program was anything goes and their evil so-called scientists carried out whatever they wanted.
That is not the system in place in America, therefore pointing to the nazis and saying we should worry about our current scientists, does not hold water. Sorry.
(http://i41.tinypic.com/2m6l3td.jpg)
Ain't that the truth.
You seem to trust man way too much. The system is not etched in stone and relative morality always is a slippery slope.
I agree with Rubystars that although currently it seems that things are being measured according to moral laws, there is no such guarantee that it will be that way in the future. It is always best to move forward cautiously lest we make a very large error.
Don't you think that the builders of the Tower of Babel had the noblest intentions? I know that they did, and their efforts ended up being against the wishes of Hashem. The rest is history.
I seen Illegal Aliens,,, does that count? :P
A little Alien on a mothership named Jose.. Flew over the border into California to pick lettuce, he got paid in pesos, brought drugs and 35 of his family members with him.. Ohhhhhhhhh.. You mean them green looking E.T. ones? Well I would take the green looking E.T. ones over the Joses
A little Alien on a mothership named Jose.. Flew over the border into California to pick lettuce, he got paid in pesos, brought drugs and 35 of his family members with him.. Ohhhhhhhhh.. You mean them green looking E.T. ones? Well I would take the green looking E.T. ones over the Joses
I wonder if they can pick lettuce though.
A lot of the experiments the Nazis did didn't make a lot of sense either, but they were done out of utter depravity and a total lack of limits as to ethical guidelines. I think if a scientist had the funding, enough secrecy surrounding the work, and could come up with a rationale for doing the research, some would do this kind of thing just for the fact that it can be done.
The comparison to the nazis y''s is not valid. They didn't have ethics committees and legal restraints or conditional funding. Their program was anything goes and their evil so-called scientists carried out whatever they wanted.
That is not the system in place in America, therefore pointing to the nazis and saying we should worry about our current scientists, does not hold water. Sorry.
KWRBT,
You seem to trust man way too much.
The system is not etched in stone
and reative morality always is a slippery slope. I agree with Rubystars that although currently it seems that things are being measured according to moral laws, there is no such guarantee that it will be that way in the future. It is always best to move forward cautiously lest we make a very large error.
Don't you think that the builders of the Tower of Babel had the noblest intentions? I know that they did, and their efforts ended up being against the wishes of Hashem. The rest is history.