JTF.ORG Forum

Save Western Civilization => Save Serbia => Topic started by: Kerber on March 18, 2011, 11:30:46 AM

Title: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on March 18, 2011, 11:30:46 AM
We are all witnesses to upcoming new aggression from NATO members. Scenario of starting the aggression is about the same as it was against Serbia - through lying media and satanisation of Libyan leadership.
But, this time Russian leaders support it. They are real traitors..

I'm very sorry for Libyan people. We, the Serbs, know what NATO(and USA) is going to bring them - many killed and their natural resources occupied.

May God help them and revenge all innocent people who are going to be killed by NATO fascist troops.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: crnitrn on March 18, 2011, 01:23:11 PM

But, this time Russian leaders support it. They are real traitors..


They done same thing for NATO bombing of Yugoslavia(Serbia)!!!
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on March 18, 2011, 01:59:22 PM
Russia abstained during the vote. They maintain that they are opposed to any military intervention. http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/article1550803.ece
Russian leaders blocked all Libyan financial operations in Russia and didn't put veto on this shameful UN  resolution. Being "neutral" is being silenced collaborator.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on March 20, 2011, 12:55:44 PM
(http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/188540_149114251818445_143360419060495_302009_8326399_n.jpg)

(http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/190360_1742520561859_1204063388_31811924_1603061_n.jpg)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Zelhar on March 20, 2011, 04:32:41 PM
I wish the "noble" Libyan people manu casualties from NATO and from their own hands. The more, the better !

Now I am also against this western intervention in Libya not because I like Qadaffi or the Libyans yemach schmam, but because clearly any replacement would be worse then him. Libya under Qaddafi is a weak state without WMD program or serious terrorist affiliation (although he was involved in both things in the past).
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: crnitrn on March 20, 2011, 07:07:18 PM
Rusija daje neku mlaku izjavu ako je protiv sto nije dala veto u savetu bezbednosti! Ruski lideri su veliki licemeri i ne mogu da ih smisim, jer su se prodali!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on March 20, 2011, 09:06:20 PM
Tripoli, Libya (CNN) -- Libyan ruler Moammar Gadhafi promised "a long-drawn war" Sunday after an international coalition hammered the nation's air defense as part of an operation to enforce a no-fly zone.

Gadhafi said the strikes were a confrontation between the Libyan people and "the new Nazis."
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03/20/libya.civil.war/index.html (http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03/20/libya.civil.war/index.html)


I absolutely agree with Gadhafi. Today leading NATO countries are the biggest fascist and nazi countries in the world. GB,FRA,USA have adopted nazi and fascist ideology and practice...

All evil empires had its time limit and the end - Egyptian, Medo-Persian, Babylonian, Roman, the Third Reich, Soviet Union, and today US-EU global fascist empire.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on March 20, 2011, 09:21:18 PM
Fascist air base in Aviano, Italy. In 1999 this base was used for aggression on Serbia and Montenegro. Today it's the same.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_tU6uWtPJQ&feature=player_embedded
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on March 20, 2011, 09:25:53 PM
Japan also supported the aggression. They were always siding with evil and fascists. I thought they have smarter things to do, like taking care for the punishment from Creator, but instead they continue to support destruction and death.

If Japan was punished like this, I can't imagine what is going to happen in EU or USA.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on March 21, 2011, 07:01:27 AM
I wish the "noble" Libyan people manu casualties from NATO and from their own hands. The more, the better !

Now I am also against this western intervention in Libya not because I like Qadaffi or the Libyans yemach schmam, but because clearly any replacement would be worse then him. Libya under Qaddafi is a weak state without WMD program or serious terrorist affiliation (although he was involved in both things in the past).

But you can't be a nazi, you are a jew. ???

Go watch your Forth Reich television!
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on March 22, 2011, 10:20:52 AM
F-15E

(http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01854/plane01_1854046c.jpg)

(http://static.politika.co.rs/uploads/rubrike/171426/i/1/libija.jpg)

(http://pics.top.rbc.ru/top_pics/resized/480x480/uniora/33/1300805046_0233.480x350.jpeg)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on March 22, 2011, 12:03:47 PM
NATO claims there was a malfunction on airplane. They really think people are retarded.

Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on March 22, 2011, 12:12:39 PM
Libya got S-300 anti air systems from Russia. It was a top secret. One of our man in Libyan Army entered the camp were those systems where stationed and he was almost shot because of that. They thought he was a spy.

Now Libya will fully provide "no-fly zone". Lol...
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Zelhar on March 22, 2011, 12:55:19 PM
I highly doubt Libya has the S-300 but even if it has one or a few then it must have been completely suppressed if not destroyed. This could be a malfunction or a shot down but either way the attrition rate is very law and clearly NATO airforce has complete domination of Libyan sky and the Libyan army is completely incapable to maneuver on ground.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on March 22, 2011, 11:21:32 PM
This is a video of Benghazi rebels taking heart out of the man, cutting his legs, hands and head off, and playing with it  in front of cheering public - one month ago (before Gadhafi started even fighting with them)! This is who America is defending! Armed Al-Qaeda! Not innocent civilians!
Just like supporting mislims in Bosnia, Albanians on Kosovo and Metohiya, ustasha regime in Croatia.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCzAMNzc5WE
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on March 23, 2011, 12:55:55 AM
Two days ago a Facebook group called "Support for Muammar al Gaddafi from the people of Serbia" was a top news on Libyan national television.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on March 23, 2011, 02:52:50 AM
Two days ago a Facebook group called "Support for Muammar al Gaddafi from the people of Serbia" was a top news on Libyan national television.

Можеш ли да поставиш снимак?
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on March 23, 2011, 05:03:32 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJU7w4EAT4E
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on March 23, 2011, 05:11:54 AM
Можеш ли да поставиш снимак?
Nemam snimak. To su objavile neke novinske agencije.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on March 23, 2011, 06:38:18 AM
Here's what Putin said. He is right.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvP3BW21VWU&feature=related
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on March 25, 2011, 03:05:45 AM
(http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/183887_1603335159584_1122252408_31207402_1328682_n.jpg)

(http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/188069_143360419060495_5378915_n.jpg)

(http://www.pressonline.rs/upload/boxImageData/2011/2/22/134301/LIBIJA-KRAJ-1.jpg)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: crnitrn on March 25, 2011, 05:31:28 AM
http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/171/gadafiheronatovaticanas.png
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on March 25, 2011, 06:28:24 AM
http://rt.com/usa/news/usa-libya-yugoslavia-anniversary-war/
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on March 25, 2011, 06:40:01 AM
http://rt.com/usa/news/usa-libya-yugoslavia-anniversary-war/
Continued fascism and support to extremism!
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on March 26, 2011, 09:56:04 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmKRRxDn_8A&feature=player_embedded
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on March 26, 2011, 01:48:59 PM
(http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/190121_150663431663527_143360419060495_309638_3544989_n.jpg)


(http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/188603_150661564997047_143360419060495_309635_6720602_n.jpg)


(http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/188715_2012703356658_1216018094_32580941_2505647_n.jpg)


(http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/189067_187003168010334_100001019571289_426085_3408802_n.jpg)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on March 26, 2011, 01:51:40 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aHcRe3iwQg&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PygyhjaAcKw&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3olzMPsv-nY&feature=related
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on March 26, 2011, 02:03:17 PM
Diana Johnstone: http://www.nspm.rs/nspm-in-english/why-are-we-making-war-against-libya-real-and-false-reasons.html
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on March 29, 2011, 08:52:51 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX7hMj2NKT
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on March 31, 2011, 02:37:36 AM
http://www.rferl.org/content/feature/2348963.html?page=3
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on April 01, 2011, 08:41:48 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AubBU12uu0
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: crnitrn on April 03, 2011, 11:51:28 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhS3ETU0qTE
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on April 04, 2011, 03:03:13 AM
http://www.nspm.rs/nspm-in-english/libyan-odyssey-and-the-dawn-of-a-new-serbian-public-opinion.html
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on April 05, 2011, 03:38:36 PM
(http://i54.tinypic.com/2ce27fb.jpg)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on April 05, 2011, 03:50:10 PM
Here is one more article in the ocean of filth by controlled western media. If he is alive, Goebbels would be proud on western journalism:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110405/ap_on_hi_te/eu_serbia_gadhafi_facebook;_ylt=Aio2jhQIRGCVx79DIyJo.Y4jtBAF;_ylu=X3oDMTJybnBlbWR0BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTEwNDA1L2V1X3NlcmJpYV9nYWRoYWZpX2ZhY2Vib29rBGNwb3MDMQRwb3MDMgRzZWMDeW5fdG9wX3N0b3J5BHNsawNzZXJibmF0aW9uYWw-

Look at this, again we are "nazis"....hahahaha....

"The same aggressors who were murdering us, now are relentlessly attacking the Libyan people," said the extremist Nasi organization — an affiliate of the Russian group with the same name — which is behind social media support campaign for Gadhafi.

This manipualtion is very interesting, like always. They lie their own population that UN approved the fascist aggression. "No- fly zone" has nothing to do with bombing. But, who cares...If a fascist newspaper said so, it must be the truth. Everything, including lies and brainwashing for supporting radical islamic "civilians", as always:

Backers on Facebook have compared the Libya bombing campaign — authorized by a U.N. Security Council resolution to protect Libyan civilians — to the 78 days of NATO airstrikes against Serbia.

.............


Interesting comment from Steve:

BTW Nasi Organization translated is "Our" Organization, I think the article misleadingly tries to make it resemble Nazi in the context that it's used... More media with a spin, imagine that...
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on April 07, 2011, 01:16:31 PM
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=24146
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on April 10, 2011, 06:10:50 AM
(http://postavi.com/hosted/acbc80c308ea34147647d44adcf253c8.jpg)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on April 10, 2011, 01:56:37 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_82CVv6Rt4
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on April 27, 2011, 09:58:55 AM
(http://www.vostok.rs/sajt/doc/Image/novosti_sr/kolumne/8218_vest_1382.jpg)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on April 30, 2011, 05:54:25 PM
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Libyan-Children-Congratulate-Prince-William-And-Dutchess-Of-Cambridge-Catherine-From-Tripoli/Article/200910415982870?lpos=World_News_Top_Stories_Header_4&lid=ARTICLE_15982870_Libyan_Children_Congratulate_Prince_William_And_Dutchess_Of_Cambridge_Catherine_From_Tripoli (http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Libyan-Children-Congratulate-Prince-William-And-Dutchess-Of-Cambridge-Catherine-From-Tripoli/Article/200910415982870?lpos=World_News_Top_Stories_Header_4&lid=ARTICLE_15982870_Libyan_Children_Congratulate_Prince_William_And_Dutchess_Of_Cambridge_Catherine_From_Tripoli)

(http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2011/Apr/Week4/15982889.jpg)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on May 01, 2011, 04:56:37 AM
(http://www.opinion-maker.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Three-children-killed-by-US-bombings-300x209.jpg)



MORE OBAMA WAR CRIMES...Libya disabled children school hit in NATO strike!!!!


Shattered glass litters the carpet at the Libyan Down's Syndrome Society, and dust covers pictures of grinning children that adorn the hallway, thrown into darkness by a NATO strike early on Saturday. It was unclear what the target of the strike was, though Libyan officials said it was Muammar Gaddafi himself, who was giving a live television address at the time... The missile completely destroyed an adjoining office in the compound that houses the government's commission for children. The force of the blast blew in windows and doors in the parent-funded school for children with Down's Syndrome and officials said...
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on May 01, 2011, 06:40:59 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2z9_6afWRxs&feature=player_embedded

A NATO missile struck a house in Tripoli where Moammar Gadhafi and his wife were staying on Saturday, missing the Libyan leader but killing his youngest son and three grandchildren, a government spokesman said. (May 1)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: cjd on May 01, 2011, 07:12:02 AM
The sad fact is that at the end of the day nothing in the least will improve in Libya... NATO should have left the animals to slaughter themselves.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: cjd on May 01, 2011, 07:28:35 AM
Looking at all the steel in the concrete walls of the home it seems the house was built to  sustain a moderate attack... It must have been a good sized bomb to do that sort of damage.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on May 01, 2011, 11:13:20 AM
One of Gaddhafi's granddaughters killed in bombings.

(http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/225527_207091832645522_204882232866482_660500_7193552_n.jpg)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on May 01, 2011, 07:13:00 PM
Public and open call for Gaddafi's assassination by CNN!
We, the Serbs, know what satanic media is CNN, but something like that wasn't the case even in the time when our country was attacked. This kind of fascist and Goebbels-like criminal activity never happened in history of modern journalism - that one media even dare to enter any kind of debate should someone be assassinated.
US became a real successor of nazi Germany when something like this is possible. Goebbels is proud.

http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/25/should-nato-assassinate-gadhafi/#comment-18832
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on May 06, 2011, 10:36:22 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuqZfaj34nc
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on June 09, 2011, 03:20:16 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-uUtySN63o&NR=1
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on June 13, 2011, 06:12:41 AM
From 04:07 to 06:19:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwhsLqgqW4k
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on June 16, 2011, 08:48:48 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35ndI5Z0C2A
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on June 16, 2011, 04:47:28 PM
An interesting fact here...considering 2009 and money from oil. Take a look:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pVQWdc7aBQ&feature=player_embedded#at=609
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on June 17, 2011, 10:58:06 AM
Delegation from Serbia in Jamhiriya TV(Libya).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10gCH_bPV9Y&feature=youtu.be
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on June 22, 2011, 04:44:55 AM
Interview with Dr. Salem Finir (Libyan Ambassador in BiH)

http://videobam.com/wAIGy
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on June 30, 2011, 02:42:06 PM
It is not my text but it is interesting to read:


Western oil companies have made a great deal of money with the Gadaffi administration. The US, in particular, following sanctions, “adopted a number of return strategies, from buying back old oil concessions (Marathon and ConocoPhillips), winning bids for new blocs (Chevron and ExxonMobil) or a combination of both (Amerada Hess and Oxy).” Since 2005 “there have been three Exploration and Production Sharing rounds in which exploration areas have been competitively bid to foreign companies.” As a result, “several new one-off deals” had been “concluded, including “massive deals with Shell and British Petroleum,” and a 25 year extension of Italian company ENI (Wikileaks, Tripoli 967).

The close relationship did not end here. In terms of arms trading to the region, the US and the EU have been very friendly indeed. An article in the Associated Press cites the fact that “the US government quietly green-lighted a $77 million deal to provide at least 50 refurbished amored troop carriers to Moammar Gadaffi’s army.” This deal “signaled growing American business contracts with his regime in the months before Libya imploded in civil war” (17 April 2011). Writing in the Guardian, Simon Rogers notes that the European Union contributed a staggering “843.5 mill Euros worth of arms exports in the first five years after the arms embargo with Libya was lifted.” In 2009 alone, some “343.7 million Euros worth of arms sales were conducted with the Gadaffi Regime” (‘EU arms exports to Libya’, Guardian: 1 March 2011). The UK in particular approved 214.8 million strategic export licenses to the region, 25 of which we know for certain were used for military purposes. NGO Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) writes that the UK government is responsible for “the export of goods including tear gas and crowd control ammunition and sniper rifles to Bahrain Libya, as well as a wide range of other miltary equipment to authoritarian regimes in the region (18 February 2011).

Like any trade relationship, the spoils are two-way: with Gadaffi selling oil to the west, and the west selling arms to Gadaffi. However, the good terms of this relationship were imperiled on two counts: the first in regard to Gadaffi’s decision to nationalize Libyan oil reserves; the second in regard to his attacks on the UN Security Council. From the slew of Tripoli-to-Washington cables published by Wikileaks it becomes immediately clear that the US worried about how to secure future oil contracts with Libya. On 15 November 2007, one cable expresses the worry that “those who dominate Libya’s political and economic leadership are pursuing increasingly nationalistic policies in the energy sector that could jeopardize efficient exploitation of Libya’s extensive oil and gas reserves” (Tripoli 967) Another cable, written on 17 June 2008, records how the Libyan government “has been pressing all International Oil Companies to accept further reductions in their production share allocations to increase Libya’s take” (Tripoli 474). Five months later, it is relayed how Gadaffi plans to “implement dramatic government restructuring” and “directly distribute shares of oil revenue to the Libyan people” (Tripoli 896). The evident concern is that a nationalized oil industry, that is, an oil industry whose proceeds will go directly to the people, enforces an alternative growth model to that used in the west. A fully socialized economic structure where wealth is distributed for the good of the nation, and thereby diverted away from western interests, agitated the west greatly. It is therefore logical to suppose that western oil companies wanted to take Libyan oil at the cheapest rate possible. Gadaffi’s regime posed a problem in this regard.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on July 02, 2011, 12:14:24 AM
Sudan deploys troops at Libya border, evicts envoy

 


KHARTOUM (Reuters) - Sudan has deployed troops at the Libyan border to prevent arms smuggling to rebels in Darfur and closed the Libyan consulate in the troubled region, a government official said on Wednesday.

Sudan shares an almost 400km-long border with Libya where a civil war against leader Muammar Qadhafi has split the desert state into a government-held western area around the capital Tripoli and an eastern region held by rebels.

"We deployed troops at the border to Libya because we are worried about arms smuggling [to rebels]," Khalid Musa, spokesman for the Sudanese foreign ministry, said.

Sudan closed the Libyan consulate in Al Fasher in Darfur and asked staff to leave within 48 hours after Libya had closed the Sudanese consulate in the eastern town of al-Kufrah, Musa said.

"We summoned the Libyan ambassador for an explanation why the consulate was closed but his answer came too late and was not satisfactory so we closed the Libyan consulate," he said.

There is little love lost between Qadhafi and Sudanese President Omar Hassan Al Bashir, who was indicted by the International Criminal Court for genocide and other war crimes in Darfur.

Relations were strained between Libya and Sudan after Qadhafi agreed to offer refuge to Darfur rebel Justice and Equality Movement chief Khalil Ibrahim, who had left peace talks in Qatar to return to fighting in Darfur.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on July 02, 2011, 12:41:42 AM
Sudanese broke into Libya


Sudanese troops broke into Libya. Gaddafi has threatened to attack Europe if NATO continues to bomb Libya. After the speech a series of explosions followed in Tripoli. Eight powerful explosions in Misurata.

Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has interrupted his days-long silence with rather brave threat that if NATO does not suspend the operation of air strikes on Libya, the war will spread to Europe, and the "homes, offices and families would become legitimate targets."

Sound recording of Gadaffi's speech was broadcast before the tens of thousands of his supporters in the main square in Tripoli, a few hours after the Libyan army hell-fire by rocket launchers broke rebels' advancing on the southern front and urged them to withdraw.

"These people are willing to, one day, bring the war in Europe ..." If we decide we can go to Europe like locusts, like bees. You are advised to withdraw before you experience a disaster ",said Gaddafi, and the enthusiastic masses chanted slogans against the West.

Besides the mass excitement, Gaddafi's speech was followed by a series of explosions in Tripoli, while NATO planes flew over the city. The least popular foreign leader in Tripoli, however, is French President Nicolas Sarkozy.

Sudanese troops broke into Libya

Sudanese troops entered without a fight on Libyan territory and occupied the town of Kufra and the nearby military base, but so far there are no indications of what the intention of President Omar Bashir's army is, as soldiers do not try to extract the oil from Libya.

(http://www.rts.rs/upload/storyBoxImageData/2011/07/02/7951848/T4.jpg)
Sudanese soldier

First Sudanese forces entered in Libya two weeks ago, but it seems that no one cared about it, and Sudanese now present protection for two oil fields that the rebels are holding - Mislah and Sarir.

The circumstances under which Sudanese entered in Libya are not known, but international organizations has recorded that some 2,000 people, mostly workers from Chad, fled the area.

NATO preparing an invasion?

At least it says Russian Ambassador to NATO, Dmitry Rogozin, who believes that recent events in Libya suggest that NATO, or at least some members of the Alliance, prepare ground operation in Libya.

(Radio Television of Serbia)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: crnitrn on July 05, 2011, 06:41:10 AM
Serbian traitors!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=os0xWtohvjo&feature=feedu
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: syyuge on July 05, 2011, 10:34:38 AM
The inter fighting between Gaddafi and rebels shall get more and more intensified. The nato shall get more and more involved actively in the incessant war. Let the vipers swallow each other. They shall pay for the damages done to Serbia at least in this manner if not otherwise.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: crnitrn on July 05, 2011, 04:28:31 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfG0FOUipXM&feature=channel_video_title
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on July 08, 2011, 07:39:00 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYympoo16FI
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: syyuge on July 08, 2011, 04:38:43 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8619353/US-Senate-drops-Libya-resolution-to-focus-on-national-debt.html
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on July 17, 2011, 02:28:31 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXLQAUUpJwU
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on July 20, 2011, 09:38:05 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yUrCkDHguc
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on July 25, 2011, 05:02:57 PM
(http://pit.dirty.ru/dirty/1/2011/07/24/26683-123241-b7e25626e7cc83e86161986773ec8b3b.jpg)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on August 02, 2011, 07:17:12 AM
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25829
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: England4Ever on August 03, 2011, 09:25:41 AM
Supporting muzzi again hey Serbs?

 So many bombs wasted on Libiya when i know somwhere better for them to be dropped!  ;D

 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: crnitrn on August 03, 2011, 10:16:43 AM
Supporting muzzi again hey Serbs?

 So many bombs wasted on Libiya when i know somwhere better for them to be dropped!  ;D

 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)
Maybe on Serbia!??
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Rational Jew on August 13, 2011, 10:00:25 PM
Who cares about libyans anyway? Let's nuke them!
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on August 14, 2011, 08:03:19 AM
Who cares about libyans anyway? Let's nuke them!

How can somebody even say something like that?
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Rational Jew on August 14, 2011, 02:30:48 PM
How can somebody even say something like that?


What do you even mean? Are you pro-Islam?
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on August 14, 2011, 02:57:17 PM
I don't choose my friends and enemies based on their religion.

I am neither pro-Islam nor anti-Islam.

I am ANTIGLOBAL.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on August 21, 2011, 08:01:06 AM
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=26084
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on August 24, 2011, 02:48:18 AM
(http://natostop.pl.ua/upload/blogs/00ab1d71b6c2bfd83829c408bc5ee64f.jpg.jpg)

 ???
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Srdjan97 on August 24, 2011, 10:36:23 PM
Supporting muzzi again hey Serbs?

 So many bombs wasted on Libiya when i know somwhere better for them to be dropped!  ;D

 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)


Again? How old are u, 5?!
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: White Israelite on August 24, 2011, 10:45:04 PM
Libya is a Muslim country however the situation is identical to Iraq, the country under Gadaffi was weak and was not really a big threat similar to Iraq under Hussein, but because Iraq was taken out of the picture, Iran has complete dominion with a new government in power, the same will happen in Syria as it has happened in Egypt but at least Israel will know who it's real enemies are now.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Hank64 on August 26, 2011, 05:37:13 PM
Libya is a Muslim country however the situation is identical to Iraq, the country under Gadaffi was weak and was not really a big threat similar to Iraq under Hussein, but because Iraq was taken out of the picture, Iran has complete dominion with a new government in power, the same will happen in Syria as it has happened in Egypt but at least Israel will know who it's real enemies are now.

Is Libya also a threat to Iran?
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Hank64 on August 26, 2011, 05:38:05 PM
(http://natostop.pl.ua/upload/blogs/00ab1d71b6c2bfd83829c408bc5ee64f.jpg.jpg)

 ???

 :::D

I wonder how many minutes did it take to phone talk
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on September 07, 2011, 04:31:00 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0bT_2-xayI
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on September 14, 2011, 04:37:24 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsKx7kbvkJA
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: maelgwyn on September 14, 2011, 06:51:27 AM
since 1979 in the UK weve had nothing but fascism in disguise!  NAZI NATO should have been disbanded like the Warsaw Pact was, but its was kept on as a sly arm off the US.  NAZI NATO is the 4th Reich, their leaders should be publicly hanged in Belgrade!  Russia has taken the wrong step! >:(
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: crnitrn on September 16, 2011, 06:13:48 PM
http://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/en_GB/features/setimes/features/2011/06/03/feature-03?gclid=CNuCvsTioqsCFeRYmAodniyPkA

true or not!?
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: serbian army on September 16, 2011, 11:59:07 PM
Loyalist heartland stands its ground against Libyan revolution

By Associated Press, Published: September 14

WADI AL-HAMMAR, Libya — The revolution’s quest to unite Libya under its control has a formidable challenge standing in the way: A swath of territory where disciplined loyalists fighters stage precision attacks and withering shelling barrages to defend land that includes Moammar Gadhafi’s hometown.

It’s far too early to predict whether the pro-Gadhafi heartland — wedged between the former rebel hub of Benghazi and the capital Tripoli — could turn into a seat of resistance such as insurgent zones in Iraq or Afghanistan. But, for the moment, it carries the same interplay of firepower and zealotry, fueling attacks that have killed at least 80 anti-Gadhafi forces in recent days.


( no / Associated Press ) - A former rebel fighter looks through binoculars at the side of the highway that links Tarhouna to Bani Walid, at a checkpoint in Wadi Dinar, near the frontline of Bani Walid, Libya, Wednesday, Sept. 14, 2011. Libyan fighters are signing up for a final assault on one of the last remaining bastions of Moammar Gadhafi. The volunteers are pouring in by the dozens, coming in pickup trucks from cities as far as Tripoli and Tobruk, as a deadline expired on Saturday for the pro-Gadhafi loyalists holed up inside the town of Bani Walid to surrender.

“Its cities are packed with weapons, missiles and ammunition depots,” said Fadl-Allah Haroun, a commander of revolutionary units near Benghazi. “It is an unbelievable force.”

Currently, former rebel fighters are assembling for an expected push into the well-defended loyalist stronghold of Bani Walid, on the western end of the 240-mile (400-kilometer) band of pro-Gadhafi territory. It includes the hunted leader’s Mediterranean birthplace Sirte and stretches to near the oil port of Ras Lanouf — which came under back-to-back attacks by loyalist forces on Monday that killed 15 guards.

The stiff resistance in Bani Walid, including by highly trained snipers, offers a glimpse of possibly much bigger fights ahead to try to dislodge Sirte and other places from loyalist hands.

Cities and towns throughout the Gadhafi belt are apparently awash with arms — with larger weapons such as 152mm Howitzer canons now well hidden against NATO airstrikes that continue in the area, revolutionary commanders told The Associated Press. The pro-Gadhafi commandos also stage hit-and-run strikes from the desert to the south, suggesting that Libya’s vast hinterlands and distant loyalist hubs such as Sabha could become rallying points for resistance fighters.

Outside Wadi Al-Hammar, a village on the coastal road about 55 miles (90 kilometers) east of Sirte, anti-Gadhafi forces have found armored vehicles hidden under tents and other weapons stashed in encampments of nomadic Bedouin tribesmen.

Al-Tayab Said, a revolutionary commander from Sabha, said loyalist fighters are trying to regroup and are using desert supply lines from Algeria.

“They are moving freely across the border,” he said. “They get constant supply.”

Other anti-Gadhafi leaders have noted the superior fighting tactics of the highly trained loyalists units compared with the civilian-heavy revolutionary brigades.

A battlefield report about a Mitsubishi pickup is now making the rounds as a cautionary tale.

On Saturday, pro-Gadhafi forces left the vehicle — loaded with ammunition — in a conspicuous hilltop in Wadi Al-Hammar. Revolutionary fighters rushed to claim the prize, but were picked off by hidden marksmen. At least 35 deaths were counted before the group managed to retreat to safety.

Dr. Ahmed Alsharif, who heads a field hospital in Nawfaliyah, said at least 80 anti-Gadhafi fighters have been killed since Saturday in or around the loyalist territory.

Ideology also is a power weapon. The loyalist resistance is believed overseen by members of Gadhafi’s “Revolutionary Committees,” which were founded in the 1970s as the eyes and ears — and muscle — of the regime on university campuses and other sites. In 1976, Gadhafi made a speech to students saying that if dissidents “want peace, they will have peace. But if they want blood, let it be bloody.”

In Umm Kunfis, a town about 60 miles (100 kilometers) east of Sirte, school papers suggested the high school curriculum was changed after the uprising began in February to demonize the regime opponents. One exercise asked students to write an essay praising a Gadhafi speech that called his critics “rats.” In religion class, students were asked to explain why the anti-Gadhafi factions were not Muslims and why it is proper to kill them.

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: serbian army on October 10, 2011, 09:07:31 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hobDCtmx0xo&skipcontrinter=1

i cry ...
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on October 11, 2011, 08:25:40 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hobDCtmx0xo&skipcontrinter=1

i cry ...

All I can say that I hope G-d will cause the changes in Russia and create conditions for stoping the beasts in their global butchery and raping.


Eventually we'll come to a point when there will be no alternative... because beasts will never stop to massacre nor withdraw from their satanic goals.
(http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/pon3.jpg)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: maelgwyn on October 12, 2011, 12:12:06 AM
Yes! They seen to be familar from the nostalgic November 7th parades ! :o
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: crnitrn on October 13, 2011, 03:51:47 AM
http://www.zangetna.com/t14504-topic
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Ulli on October 13, 2011, 04:53:09 AM
I wish the "noble" Libyan people manu casualties from NATO and from their own hands. The more, the better !

Now I am also against this western intervention in Libya not because I like Qadaffi or the Libyans yemach schmam, but because clearly any replacement would be worse then him. Libya under Qaddafi is a weak state without WMD program or serious terrorist affiliation (although he was involved in both things in the past).

Exactly. You can choose in this hellhole between Al-Quaida and Gadaffi.

Althrough I am surprised that grandpa Gadaffi fights his opponents as well as Nato so hard and perseveringly. It is totally unusual for a average quranimal.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Zelhar on October 13, 2011, 05:44:44 AM
Exactly. You can choose in this hellhole between Al-Quaida and Gadaffi.

Althrough I am surprised that grandpa Gadaffi fights his opponents as well as Nato so hard and perseveringly. It is totally unusual for a average quranimal.
Well you know the rumor in Israel is that he is actually a Jew. ‎There are Libyan Jews in Israel who say Qadafi is in fact their cousin. Their aunt, his mother, was a rebellious young Jewess who married a muslim sheik.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Ulli on October 13, 2011, 06:11:31 AM
Well you know the rumor in Israel is that he is actually a Jew. ‎There are Libyan Jews in Israel who say Qadafi is in fact their cousin. Their aunt, his mother, was a rebellious young Jewess who married a muslim sheik.

Was there not also a story of a pilot?
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Zelhar on October 13, 2011, 07:12:07 AM
Was there not also a story of a pilot?
I don't know.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: serbian army on October 16, 2011, 01:42:38 AM
Exactly. You can choose in this hellhole between Al-Quaida and Gadaffi.

Althrough I am surprised that grandpa Gadaffi fights his opponents as well as Nato so hard and perseveringly. It is totally unusual for a average quranimal.
That is what happens when you have Serb fighters on your side.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on October 20, 2011, 08:37:50 AM
Unfortunately, servants of the new world order had brutally murdered Colonel Gaddafi.

But, we will see whether this is true or not.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on October 20, 2011, 03:26:37 PM
(http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/300707_2237206883830_1057713518_32030285_1265641543_n.jpg)

(http://flipthepyramid.com/images/easyblog_images/42/capturedc3a9cran2011102.jpg)
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: serbian army on October 21, 2011, 10:12:19 PM
I don't know what is the truth but I know he was the greatest hero to ever lived on African continent.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Just Nick on October 22, 2011, 11:31:09 PM
How can you guys support these Libyan muslim nazi state? Qaddafi was an animal who deserve to burn in hell for the rest of his afterlife. It's crazy. These are the same muslim nazis who were trying to take over the Balkans throught many centuries. You would say it's a different situation. But guess what -- it is all called Islam, and it's dangerous.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on October 23, 2011, 12:29:49 AM
How can you guys support these Libyan muslim nazi state? Qaddafi was an animal who deserve to burn in hell for the rest of his afterlife. It's crazy. These are the same muslim nazis who were trying to take over the Balkans throught many centuries. You would say it's a different situation. But guess what -- it is all called Islam, and it's dangerous.

No.

Our country and ex-YU area is enslaved by EU and USA. Muslims are pushed into wars by those. Mislims on Balkans are just a stupid toy, an instrument, for reaching goals of new world order beasts. The same thing happened in Lybia.

USA and some EU countries(who participated in raping of Lybia, just like Serbia) had depts to Lybia over 200 billions dolars for using their oil. Next year that usage would be stopped and Gaddafi refused to sign another contracts until debts are paid.
And he is removed.

Gaddafi didn't try anything here. He supported Serbia. USA and EU sent their Albanian terrorist leaders to ask for recognition of our occupied Kosovo and Metohia region(occupied by USA and EU, not Gaddafi).
He received Albanian terrorist leaders, danced with them, cheered , etc... In the end he said "I will never recognize independent Kosovo, and now you may leave".


At least 90% of Serbs fully supported colonel against common enemy.

PS
Drugged gangs and Al-Qaida members who fought together with NATO against Lybia are the same like Albanians or Bosnian muslims here on Balkans. As I said - just a tool.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on October 23, 2011, 12:36:54 AM
Testimony of Libya - Lizzy Phelan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RFvpfkUyBqE#!
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on October 24, 2011, 04:54:33 AM
How can you guys support these Libyan muslim nazi state? Qaddafi was an animal who deserve to burn in hell for the rest of his afterlife. It's crazy. These are the same muslim nazis who were trying to take over the Balkans throught many centuries. You would say it's a different situation. But guess what -- it is all called Islam, and it's dangerous.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8844819/Libyas-liberation-interim-ruler-unveils-more-radical-than-expected-plans-for-Islamic-law.html
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on October 25, 2011, 09:19:45 AM
War criminal Wesley Clark explains Libyan invasion, Syria, Somalia planned years in advance

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=fSNyPS0fXpU

Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Kerber on October 25, 2011, 09:21:55 AM
Putin: Who gave NATO right to kill Gaddafi?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=Iw5Ij_RFJ1Q
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: serbian army on October 29, 2011, 02:34:17 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Thy0dKb4J3s#!

The earth are groaning under bombs of NATO,
Black hawks are flying in the sky.
Sirt is as Stalingrad:
The explosions are above the city,
And there are the words: «Not one step back»

Kaddafi deserved a great glory,
He will be always alive.
He gave the last fight
Against shameless mafia of the world.

The civilization was killed,
Barbarians are dancing after they were washed themselves in blood
Murderers became mad because of the oil!
Obama, you should repent! You should feel fear, Sarkozi!

The aggressors could be happy because of the Victory,
But it`s Pyrrhic victory.
The arsonists will get evil as a reckoning.
Yankee are damned for this war.
Title: Re: NATO agression on Lybya
Post by: Slobodan on November 09, 2011, 01:01:53 PM
http://mathaba.net/news/?x=629289
Title: BOTH SIDES ARE EVIL
Post by: Khan Krum on July 08, 2012, 04:18:10 AM
Gaddhafi and the rebels are evil!