JTF.ORG Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: edu on May 22, 2011, 01:02:00 AM

Title: Which Presidential Candidate is Really Against Land for "Peace"?
Post by: edu on May 22, 2011, 01:02:00 AM

A lot of Presidential candidates talk nicely about Israel before they are elected, but when they get elected they more or less do the same thing of pressuring Israel to make concessions on land and security in exchange for worthless promises by Arab terrorists and dictators.
Is there any presidential candidate running who outright rejects the land for "peace" formula.

Title: Re: Which Presidential Candidate is Really Against Land for "Peace"?
Post by: muman613 on May 22, 2011, 01:44:46 AM

Quote from: edu on May 22, 2011, 01:02:00 AM

A lot of Presidential candidates talk nicely about Israel before they are elected, but when they get elected they more or less do the same thing of pressuring Israel to make concessions on land and security in exchange for worthless promises by Arab terrorists and dictators.
Is there any presidential candidate running who outright rejects the land for "peace" formula.

Dream on.... An American politician can be counted on for only one thing.... You can count on them to be unaccountable for what they said before the election. That is virtually the definition of a politician in todays world.

Let us hope that whomever is elected is guided by righteousness and not cowardice.

Title: Re: Which Presidential Candidate is Really Against Land for "Peace"?
Post by: Kahane-Was-Right BT on May 22, 2011, 01:46:06 AM

None that I know of.

Title: Re: Which Presidential Candidate is Really Against Land for "Peace"?
Post by: mord on May 22, 2011, 06:55:32 AM

Huckabee which there was an Article in 'The New York Nazi Qurananimal Times' that said the Obama team really feared Huckabee.Because inside polling showed he could win outside the South.Penn.,N.J. and Fla which is the South