JTF.ORG Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: eb22 on August 07, 2012, 10:05:40 PM

Title: Conservative Majority Fund PAC bringing up Politically Incorrect BHO subjects!
Post by: eb22 on August 07, 2012, 10:05:40 PM

So far in this election cycle,    the Conservative Majority Fund PAC is the most impressive PAC I've seen.     Like JTF,   they aren't politically correct.         They focus on key subjects that the pathetic Romney campaign and establishment Republicans wouldn't touch with a 10 yard pole!      The leftist sites are attacking them,   which is an encouraging sign that CMF's strategy is working:

http://conservativesnow.com/obama-campaign-watch

http://conservativesnow.com/presidential-polls

http://conservativesnow.com/fighting-voter-fraud

http://conservativesnow.com/what-are-we-doing

http://conservativesnow.com/action-center

Title: Re: Conservative Majority Fund PAC bringing up Politically Incorrect BHO subjects!
Post by: Nachus on August 08, 2012, 01:06:54 AM

 :dance:


Exactly. Superb eb22!

Title: Re: Conservative Majority Fund PAC bringing up Politically Incorrect BHO subjects!
Post by: Khan Krum on August 08, 2012, 12:59:58 PM

Political corectness can go screw itself! Now I'm going to go look at the latest Pat Condell video.

Title: Re: Conservative Majority Fund PAC bringing up Politically Incorrect BHO subjects!
Post by: Debbie Shafer on August 08, 2012, 04:44:01 PM

Thanks for the info...glad to see Sheriff Joe's picture up there too.

Title: Re: Conservative Majority Fund PAC bringing up Politically Incorrect BHO subjects!
Post by: eb22 on August 22, 2012, 11:03:03 PM

Quote from: Debbie Shafer on August 08, 2012, 04:44:01 PM

Thanks for the info...glad to see Sheriff Joe's picture up there too.

My pleasure,  Debbie ( and Nachus ).     

Debbie,  like you,   I'm also glad that CMF supports Sheriff Joe.    He's a definition of an American Patriot.

Some good news.    CMF raised $ 1.2 million,   which is the 6th highest on the PAC list that 'overtly advocate for or against candidates'.

http://www.politico.com/politicoinfluence/0812/politicoinfluence328.html