You may or may not agree with me, thats fine, but:
I put this on my blog:
http://themadjewess.com/2013/05/05/barack-israel-has-right-to-defend-itself-thats-because-obama-wants-muslim-brohood-in-syrian-govt/
What? Why was it not the brightest decision to attack Syria during its civil war? Syria is at its weakest while in an ongoing multiyear civil war. That is exactly the time to strike them. There should be many more strikes, not just one wimpy one.
What does bombing SYria have to do with trusting Obama? Do you think he approved of this strike? But even so, why would that matter? The Israelis wanted to bomb this target. Even if they stupidly went to Obama for approval beforehand (I'm not sure they did that), and then he gave it, why is that relevant? They already wanted to bomb it.
What? Why was it not the brightest decision to attack Syria during its civil war? Syria is at its weakest while in an ongoing multiyear civil war. That is exactly the time to strike them. There should be many more strikes, not just one wimpy one.
What does bombing SYria have to do with trusting Obama? Do you think he approved of this strike? But even so, why would that matter? The Israelis wanted to bomb this target. Even if they stupidly went to Obama for approval beforehand (I'm not sure they did that), and then he gave it, why is that relevant? They already wanted to bomb it.
If they did it to keep Assad from transferring chemical weapons I am all for it. If it was done to help the rebels in Syria who will not be better for Israel just as in Egypt, then I am against it.
What? Why was it not the brightest decision to attack Syria during its civil war? Syria is at its weakest while in an ongoing multiyear civil war. That is exactly the time to strike them. There should be many more strikes, not just one wimpy one.
What does bombing SYria have to do with trusting Obama? Do you think he approved of this strike? But even so, why would that matter? The Israelis wanted to bomb this target. Even if they stupidly went to Obama for approval beforehand (I'm not sure they did that), and then he gave it, why is that relevant? They already wanted to bomb it.
If they did it to keep Assad from transferring chemical weapons I am all for it. If it was done to help the rebels in Syria who will not be better for Israel just as in Egypt, then I am against it.
If they did it to keep Assad from transferring chemical weapons I am all for it. If it was done to help the rebels in Syria who will not be better for Israel just as in Egypt, then I am against it.
They said it was a chemical weapons convoy. I think Israel has made it pretty clear up to this point that they hesitate in taking sides because both sides are evil and dangerous.
Is it OK if I have a differing opinion than you? Is that OK? I have my own thoughts.
The "Rebels" are the ones using the chems.
I just asked b/c you always seem mad at me for how I feel and my thoughts.
I listened to your interview with Steve Cooper a few days ago. It was great.
I definitely would like to hear the interview. If anyone can post the link to the interview, it would be much appreciated.
The interview was done a few years ago. Sometime ago I looked for it on Steve Coopers website, but I don't think it is up there anymore.
Last week I found the mp3 on my computer.